Lust aside, Jim has a point. The unwashed masses could care less what Scalia’s DIL thinks, but they follow Swift with that same lustful attention that Jim (likewise) mentioned. Socialization points many to want to emulate her. In looks, dress, and heaven forbid... vote.
Jim... Really? Untruthfulness? Please. And the other one is as ludicrous. Proper judicious behavior? He gave an impassioned answer to a ludicrous charge. Would to God I had that much restraint in the same situation. You should remember Proverbs 17:28 and stop posting.
Back to the issue at hand— and I am not asking this to be offensive to any woman out there. Sexual assault of any kind is completely inexcusable… But, can anyone explain why it seems that a woman's testimony is automatically believed as truth no matter what, and the man was automatically a liar? Look at how many media, politicians, and even actors have come out and said "I believe her…" Good grief why? Just because she said it? Unsubstantiated, no proof whatsoever… But because it was a Trumatic experience to talk about it is automatically true? Just saying...
Jim— Confusing on three levels. First the quote that you posted seems to reflect that it is NOT a hate group. Second, that you believe anything posted to Wikipedia at face value. Third, that you trust SPLA as a valid source...
The problem stems from the intentional utilization of terminology that is confusing. In their push to get evolution accepted universally, they have used the term "microevolution" as synonymous with "natural selection." Natural selection refers to changes in allele frequency— variations that happen within the organisms DNA. (Color variation, beak size… nose size for us humans.) The thing to remember is that in natural selection, a cat is always a cat… A dog is always a dog... nothing becomes a different kind, it just looks a tad different.
Well gentlemen, I will say this: looking at the "plumbing" would not necessarily be an effective method. Plumbing can be changed. How ever, looking at the chromosomes is absolutely full proof. XX chromosome if it is a female, XY chromosome if it is male. Neither surgery nor drugs can change your DNA. Plus it will save ink… Two letters for either versus three (boy) or four. (Girl)
About OEC— (devils advocate) Have you ever considered who was holding the stopwatch on creation before Adam? Relativity teaches time moves slower under stronger gravity, and Heaven would literally sit on top of the entire universe, bearing that gravitational force. Hence, a day with the Lord would be a 1000 years… Or even longer… Just a thought
I spent quite a few years working with teen boys, (felons in a secure facility) Several of them were actually excited when this trend started here in the US…. They wanted to be moved to a female facility, so they claimed they "identified" as young ladies. Many of them were sex offenders, so you can probably guess what their interest was. Fortunately, at that time, the answer was NO. The question is, to these unthinking morons… Do you really think it's only going to be the confused children who are "identifying" as females to use these showers, and have access to young ladies?
Connor7— Stevenr realizes that many rich and famous people talk about themselves in the third person, so Stevenr hopes that if he talks about himself in the third person, someone will write him a big check.
Like many of you, I agree with this person's overall idea… They started as pagan, let them go back to be classified only as pagan. But for his argument why, I rechecked. That is just like saying that because the world uses Jesus's name as a cuss word, we should stop using the name Jesus. Because the world uses the cross as a decoration, we should give up the cross. Just saying.
10/11/18 7:32 PM
