These stories crack me up sometimes. The fact is, it doesnât matter if âChristianâsâ views had changed or not. The Bible still says In Proverbs 20:1 âWine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise.â
I taught Sociology/Criminal Justice at a secular community College for nine years; my last few years I started seeing a multitude of homosexual studentsâand honestly, I could deal with them. But then I was approached by an openly effeminate student name Daniel who informed me that âI am going through âthe change,â and would preferred to be called by my new name Isabellaâand would for for for you to use feminine pronouns when referring to me.â I very graciously thanked it for itâs proposal, and never had another problem in class... Because I never referred to it again. I never called on it, and never spoke to it. So, in shortâŚ I never used a feminine pronoun to describe it, and never worried about my job. Just saying.
I love how the far left continues to demonize someone as guilty that has only been accused... not proven guilty, not even going to trialâ but accused by people that have no credible evidence that the incidents took place. These unjust liberals continue to rail against him as being a horrible person because someone came out of the woodwork and said âlook this happened to me a really long time ago.â I think anyone who is ever suffered a false accusation truly understands the deep hurt that Kavanaugh and his family has went throughâ and those Who automatically believe these accusers that have testimonies that donât always agree might consider a very famous trial that took place with accusers whose testimony did not agreeâŚ And that was Christâs âŚ Ask yourself, who are you more like right now?
Well, are you still work with a woman who told me that, (in a former life) she lived in Egypt they used hover craft to move the large blocks in the place. Since I had A first-hand witness of how this was done, none of these studies have ever interested me. As an aside she also told me what life was like on Atlantis before it sank.... but if I remember right she was a man when she lived in Atlantis.
Jim. Correct me if Iâm wrong, but is there not a stipulation that you must have a certain percentageâŚ I believe itâs somewhere around 12%âŚ or 1/8th of Native American blood in order to actually draw any type of benefit. Now, Iâm not great at mathâŚ But I believe there is a slight difference between the 1/8th and 1/1024th that her test seems to place her in. On top of that, from what I understand she was actually tested against South/Central Americans not actual native North Americans. It seems to me that the liberal media is skirting those issues in their hurry to promote the nazi party âone drop of Jewish bloodâ rule. Just saying
I know a guy who worked for a labor union. Every election cycle he told me he was going to vote RepublicanâŚ But he had his yard full of Democrat candidate signs. Why? Because they would slash his tires and kill his dog if he dared put a republican candidate sign in his yard. The unions are no different then the rest of the democratic partyâŚ They want everyone to be in lockstep, (goosestep?) with the party lineâŚ In this case the party line is the disenfranchised minorities who all support that moron who wanted to kneel on the field during the national anthem. They canât have anybody that might deviate from that narrative. That will lose them votes. Just saying
It wasnât too long back that the headlines read âDivorces are trending down in the US.â What they didnât mention in that particular headline was that the reason behind lower divorce rate was lower marriage rate. Just saying
Lust aside, Jim has a point. The unwashed masses could care less what Scaliaâs DIL thinks, but they follow Swift with that same lustful attention that Jim (likewise) mentioned. Socialization points many to want to emulate her. In looks, dress, and heaven forbid... vote.
Jim... Really? Untruthfulness? Please. And the other one is as ludicrous. Proper judicious behavior? He gave an impassioned answer to a ludicrous charge. Would to God I had that much restraint in the same situation. You should remember Proverbs 17:28 and stop posting.
Back to the issue at handâ and I am not asking this to be offensive to any woman out there. Sexual assault of any kind is completely inexcusableâŚ But, can anyone explain why it seems that a woman's testimony is automatically believed as truth no matter what, and the man was automatically a liar? Look at how many media, politicians, and even actors have come out and said "I believe herâŚ" Good grief why? Just because she said it? Unsubstantiated, no proof whatsoeverâŚ But because it was a Trumatic experience to talk about it is automatically true? Just saying...
Jimâ Confusing on three levels. First the quote that you posted seems to reflect that it is NOT a hate group. Second, that you believe anything posted to Wikipedia at face value. Third, that you trust SPLA as a valid source...