|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ CBCPREACHER ” |
|
|
| Page 1 | Page 8 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 9/4/07 4:41 PM |
| Cbcpreacher | | NY | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Oblivious to Truth, first, must I tell you again, I pastor a small church, and I am a bi-vocational pastor. I don't get paid a salary from the church large enough to support me, and even if it was, I work for the Great Shepherd, not the people in this church.
Second, part of the reason this church is small is because I preach the truth, and people have left. Many people don't like to hear the truth that eternal security doesn't mean "easy believism" (which I preach against with a passion). They don't want to hear that Jesus is looking for disciples, not converts, which is what I preached on Sunday. That don't like to hear that we are to put God's kingdom before anything else (Matt. 6:33) which is my text for this Sunday. So before you get all huffy and self righteous, I preach the truth, and yes, I do cram it down their throats because most of them won't take their medicine like they should!!! |
|
|
| 9/3/07 11:18 AM |
| Cbcpreacher | | NY | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
JD. "The denomination "pastors" is devilish and satanic and should be avoided." I won't ask you if you belong to a denomination, because I know you will say no. I will ask, do you go to a church where the pastor teaches dispensationalism? If so, why? Did he, and you, come to this complete understanding of it on your own? If he does teach it from the pulpit, why? Shouldn't every person in that congregation come to an understanding of it on their own? In fact, if what you say about pastors is true, we should have NO teaching in the church. The Spirit should teach every christian at home. What ignorance you spew!
"he has planned on many faithful pastors and many local churches." This sentence, in the same post, showws how you contradict yourself.
First quote-no pastor (unless from your slant, I guess)
Second quote-yes pastor
 |
|
|
 9/2/07 9:02 PM |
| Cbcpreacher | | NY | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Judith G. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,ha!!!
Thank you for the great post! It's a joke, right? You are kidding? I do have to say, though, your comparison of Hinn to "Hugh Heffner, Donald Trump, Snoop Dog, Hollywood actors, California Governors, Pro Atheletes, etc." is more appropriate than you will ever know. Try this post with the pastors in 3rd world countries who can't even afford a Bible, much less a Rolex! READ YOUR BIBLE! |
|
|
| 9/1/07 10:08 PM |
| Cbcpreacher | | NY | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
JD, I wrote, "BTW, I won't follow your link. I know what the Bible says just as well as you think you do. I'll leave it at that." I wrote that because I have heard plenty of what you have to say. I was not saying I am not willing to learn. I am saying that as I have debated with you, I have seen more than enough from scripture to know that you are far out there. I don't need any links to help me further on your points because they are not biblical.
I know and understand the different disoensations throughout scripture, God's conditions (or tests) and man's faliure in each one. I understand and adhere to the dispensational eschatology that refers to the pre-trib rapture, 7 year tribulation, the battle of Armeggedon,the 2nd coming of Christ to set up His Millenial kingdom, the loosing of Satan for a short season, the defeat of Satan and the restoration of all things. I know that God will fulfill His promises to national Israel and that Israel and the church are not the same. I just don't go to the extremes that you do in the understanding of some of these points. Does that answer your question?
Also, JD, I think you and HeHe are one and the same, Yes? |
|
|
| 9/1/07 9:58 PM |
| Cbcpreacher | | NY | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
HeHe, I know that you are someone who has posted in this discussion and won't own up to it. That's ok. "He talks a lot of smack until he gets smacked and then he talks a lot about love, insinuating that JD is filled with hate for speaking as he himself has spoken in the past." There's a difference between "getting smacked" and realizing a lost cause. Jesus said that in the last days people would believe lies. JD, and you, whoever you are, seem to fall into that category. That doesn't make me happy, but I, and others, have tried to help you see. You, and JD, refuse to listen. So be it. "CBC portrays for us the liberal mind at work in the self-professed conservative Christian". What part of me has been liberal? Standing for the truth? Speaking plainly? Not drinking the red koolaid of JD's hermeneutical suicide? A liberal is someone who always has something to hide, kind of like coming on as HeHe, as opposed to who you really are. Whoever you are, enjoy yourself, because I won't be responding to HeHe again. |
|
|
| 9/1/07 9:37 PM |
| Cbcpreacher | | NY | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
JD, I agree with MurrayA, this is a waste of time. Take it as a victory, if you will. I just finished meeting with my men's Bible study group. These men, unlike you, are ready and willing to learn, as well as to challenge me. We don't all leave on the same page, but we do all leave loving one another. We use our Bibles and we study the scriptures. A lot of talk tonight about the end times; the rapture, the trib, the Millenium, but we all agreed that we don't expect God to let us off the hook. We are prepared, and continue preparing, to go through whatever God may have in store for us. BTW, I won't follow your link. I know what the Bible says just as well as you think you do. I'll leave it at that.
One more thing, I have realized I don't need to win this argument. I choose to live by the words, "Hope for the best, prepare for the worse. We could both be wrong on our eschatology and on our theology. However, I'm thankful that it is the blood of Christ that saves me and not having all of my doctrinal ducks in a row. Good night! |
|
|
| 9/1/07 12:35 PM |
| Cbcpreacher | | NY | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
JD, which is worse, to use a quote to help explain a person's understanding or to twist and mangle the Bible to make it fit our interpretation? You give explanations of scripture from men from recent years who advocate your stand (very few men) while others give you what they have learned from the study of MANY individuals over MANY years from MANY different denominational backgrounds about the understood truth of scripture. Yes, there may be minor variations, but the general thought is consistent. For someone to get YOUR understanding of theology (and again, I consider myself dispensational, but not to your degree), the must buy a Scofield or Darby Bible and do the scriptural jumping through hoops. To quote you, "You may swallow that but I think I will pass on it." And again, to quote you, "I am not happy about that, I am sad for you." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
