Jim I agree with the other comments Why post on sermon audio if you don’t trust their sources? I would suggest sermon audio are trustworthy in the sources they use and I believe they serve and glorify God in the accounts they obtain.To denounce WND is to denounce sermon audio in this case and implies SA are unreliable and therefore why do you post on it? You contradict yourself!
Jude 18,19 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts. 19 These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit.
That is what the bible clearly says We either accept it or reject it. If we reject it we do so at our peril. If we reject one part of the bible we reject all of it If we are honest with ourselves
The rainbow after the flood not only symbolised Gods promise to men but also that wickedness will be utterly punished and destroyed.by using this they condemn themselves
Lead us not into temptation implies simply this ;-that God would keep us from falling into sin as we are unable to uphold ourselves without his grace working in us by The Holy Spirit It is being expressed negatively and it is really saying lead us away from temptation by your Holy Spirit and don’t leave us to ourselves
In terms of thoughts on the remnant yes this is the biblical emphasis but there will still be a great multitude which no man can number around the throne.they may be few in our age or Noahs age but many in others.Praise him for those he plucked as brands from the burning!
Well said ladybug Read statement number A saved person CANNOT have same sex attractions or be a sodomite essentially. Not according to Romans 1 v 26 to 28 AV! Im behind what you say
This is evil.Article 8 states that a saved person can experience attraction for the same sex.Not according to Romans 1 they cannot. The Authorized version states that they are given over to a reprobate mind.It is a progression in sin and God has rejected them ie they are reprobate. Thats what reprobate means-forsaken by God.
I am sorry that there seems to misunderstanding in this debate. I myself am a medical doctor. I am an emergency room physician. in medical practice the mothers life is not devalued.It is standard practice and and a well recognised maxim of obstetric practice that the greater efforts made to keep a mother alive and treat her illness is usually the best way to benefit the health of the baby as its the mothers body thats maintaining the babys life and wellbeing physiologically and medically.It is therefore absurd to suggest the mother wellbeing is neglected as this would result in a worse outcome for baby in medical practice.If a mother was neglected in the way suggested mothers and fathers would soon start suing healthcare practitioners because of the adverse outcomes for the mother AND baby that would result
I appreciate the comments re the authenticity of a profession of faith. There are many bible verses warning of it eg Matthew 7 v 22.However there is persecution in these lands so it seems a bit unlikely that false converts would side with Christ and suffer?
John Y Hello I have never met you and do not know you. I follow the online debate with interest.Respectfully can i ask you a question. What do you regard as the reason the Protestant church left the Catholic Church ie what were they actually protesting about and in what way do you think they are different in our modern age?
Is this article designed to divorce the minds of the saved from what can be a good exercise in principle and God may bless it.Is it subtly written as an attack to undermine this godly service to the nation's children in the minds of those who love the Lord and his cause.It may be precisely because they are an effective weapon against Satan's kingdom that they are being rubbished
Am ignorant on this subject but why doesn't the conservative USA break away from the liberal parts into 2 separate countries and preserve Godliness that way?