|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ PENNNNED ” |
|
|
| Page 1 | Page 14 · Found: 489 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 3/3/15 10:09 AM |
| pennnned | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Walter wrote:
They are forcing it on us right now. 81% vote against it and an Alabame heavyweight Head Supreme Court justice Roy Moore fighting will all his might, it is still being forced. Vessels of honor, vessels fitted for destruction. good point. and in the moment of truth, Russell Moore, ethics leader of the SBC says something like Godly men in positions should step down (denying the national, legal and reform heritage of lesser magistrates, basically rewriting the process in which judicial decisions are made).... so instead of supporting those in positions of influence who defend biblical principles, foundations of the nation and who hold the support of the great majority, they like progressives become the stumbling block to righting the wrong. |
|
|
| 3/1/15 3:21 PM |
| pennnned | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
if ever a story illustrates how far the 501c3 corporations posing as churches have fallen is to see the wrath of the system on this man of God, in jail for 10 yrs for withdrawing money out of his bank account and now new trumped up charges. He knew the corruption of the age and was teaching on it. to see he is now in isolation is a sad thing to hear. this man of God who is leading so many to Christ...used as a scapegoat, they are making it clear church.... conform to them and remain silent to their corruption, corporatize your churches and make them the head. http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/should-creation-teacher-spend-the-rest-of-his-life-in-prison/ Title: Should Creation Teacher Spend the Rest of His Life in Prison? - "federal government has spent over a half million dollars of tax money to convict a man in prison for mailing a letter." |
|
|
| 2/28/15 8:47 PM |
| pennnned | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Penny, I will remind you that MacArthur is more often right than wrong. Supporting the government in most cases is the right thing to do. For a more detailed analysis, read the following: [URL=http://www.biblebb.com/files/CAESAR.HTM]]]Rendering To Caesar---A Biblical Perspective On Government[/URL]. Jim, I might suggest its not about weighing out the balances, nor comparing ourselves to all the other decrepit souls out there. There will always be one that's worse than us and another who is better in our own eyes.... the scriptures say that if even one law is broken the whole law is broken. But if one holds himself above his transgressions is he not still holding on to them? It would be best for the witness of Christ that if those who follow Him have wronged others and hurt others by their actions, that they apologize, after all, how much has Christ forgiven those who do not deserve it? of course, when we are talking about whole countries, where millions of Christians and moderates must flee for their lives, what is it to us, if we speak, its only words, right? |
|
|
| 2/28/15 9:41 AM |
| pennnned | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
The last time I heard, John MacArthur was human, and thus can make mistakes. the biblical response for Macarthur regarding speaking for evangelicals on Larry King that they must support the wars and HS (indirectly, by saying "trust" without accountability) would be to apologize. God has given us a process for restitution. |
|
|
| 2/26/15 9:42 AM |
| pennnned | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Frank wrote:
I am arguing against the oath that swears to our heavenly Father to disobey our heavenly Father. thank you for your reply. this is an interesting point, I see you didn't get any other takers on this topic, but it has bothered me that scriptures say not to take oaths but let your yes be yes.... |
|
|
| 2/24/15 2:23 PM |
| pennnned | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Frank wrote:
They are taking an oath to preserve and defend something that supports immoralities; abortion,homosexuals,etc I don't see this...abortion, for instance was an OVERRIDING of the constitution's enumerated powers. if they had respected the const, roe v wade would not exist. the same thing repeated in Alabama. 81% of the public voted against same sex marriage. now the federal courts are trying to create law. this also is not in the const., which is against the balancing of powers of the three branches. recently a prolife bill went through congress and the republicans dropped it like a hot potato. they do not have the WILL to follow the const which requires moral fortitude. $$$$ to the highest bidder is the law of the land. they were elected to follow the const and they outright refuse to do so. this is what makes Russell Moore's comments so troubling. the courts are literally creating law out of thin air, when he supports this, he is supporting an oligarch system in which those instituted into positions can rule however they want. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
