the population already turned on its own. there's millions who were not born and those millions did not have millions and large percentage autistic or autoimmune low functioning because of aborted fetal cell industries that are well celebrated even still.... we talk of a CW as if it hasn't already happened.
walk the streets of the neighborhoods that were once filled with two parent families, the neighborhoods built in the late 50s, where the moms stayed home and the baby boomer children played in the forest and neighborhoods until towards dark.... and today you will find..... working class families with few to no kids, and those on gov assistance having them with broken up families..... streets empty and those same baby boomers living alone with manicured lawns.... seen a lot of it.
there's a song, where have all the cowboys gone?
should be, where have all the children gone?
number one name for children in london is muhammed.
its medicine, right? gotta be good. for an entire generation, evangelicals have been told of these things.... they just said it was "conspiracy theories".... and here it is out in the open, just as it was said.
where's the repentance?
Title: Vaccine Industry Drives Trade in Aborted Baby Parts
"The cell lines she is referring to ‚ÄĒ MRC-5 and WI-38 ‚ÄĒ propagated from lung tissue of mature aborted fetuses, are used in the current manufacture of a number of routine vaccines, including those for measles, mumps and rubella (MMRV), diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio, (DTaP-IPV), Hepatitis A and chickenpox."
Unprofitable Servant wrote: In penned‚Äôs theology it is the fault of Christian conspiracies, carnality in the church,, and misguided eschatological teaching.
Scriptures tell us to avoid men who come to us with their endless geneologies....."But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain." Titus 3:9
dipsensationalism is based on this foundation.
do you not know when you take on people groups into your religious fold that are not CHristians you take on their religions?
is this not Solomon did? did not the hebrews of old get told by God not to bring in foreign gods into their religion?
these perverted generations were told for decades that the shots had fetal cell lines in them and that it was these that had the most autoimmune reactions (autism) in children. now we see as a norm children with neurological disorders, brain disorders, etc.
and now that it is in vogue to criticize PP as being on the "left" we find stories like how researchers take aborted fetal organs and blend them with rats making chimeras for scientific experimentation.
then we wonder their obsession with taking a baby even after birth, and many surmise it would be to keep the organs alive, that this would be good money.
and after these horrors, do we see evangelicals repenting and re analyzing their endorsements?
or just blaming the democrats?
now that statistically there's at least an autistic kid for every classroom....
... who is going to take care of them?
are evangelicals really feeling what is on the land or the recent upsurge in the stock market giving them confidence?
if there was judgment on the land, would they even recognize it?
does God shield some from the effects of sin as a form of judgment?
do we not see in the old testament so many examples, when they had fallen to sin, the effects were on the young and innocent (ie those who could not speak for
Unprofitable Servant wrote: Sure, for instance because you have the presupposition that the church replaced Israel,
I'm starting to find humor in the whole "replacement" thing. I mean, I"ve read the bible all the way through and the historical accounts show a time of judges with more years of rebellion than anything else, they begged for a king and got Saul, later Solomon with hundreds of concubines and then there was the Moloch worship, child sacrifice, and the major minor prophets foreshadowing the taking away of both the northern and southern kingdom and then years of zealot wars that got them nowhere and then Christ coming to a temple with utter corruption and debauchery within. essenes made accounts if Christ's words and experiences not enough.
He declares Himself the temple, the curtain torn in two, Paul brings back gentiles.
is that not enough to paint a picture of a remnant? the samaritan women was told those would worship in spirit and truth.... descendent of the israelis (northern kingdom) who had no temple.
Jerus is called "The place where all the prophets were martyred" in revelations
Christians are to be truthtellers.
let's not replace biblical teaching with pop theology.
John UK wrote: Not only were the Jews a picture, but the city of God also, Zion, Jerusalem. Zion always has been and always will be the epicentre of God's people. Physical in the OT and spiritual in the NT. John 4:20-21 KJV (20) Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.
yes, dear brother, what a glorious gospel.
"In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13
Wilson wrote: This makes me sick, I thought the left wanted separation of church and state?Im seeing a double standard here
a free church is made up of individuals who have constitutional rights.
a corporation does not have constitutional rights but is subservient to non discriminatory code and restricted to the public good under the headship of the state that incorporates it.
a church that signs itself up as a non profit must abide as such to keep their non tax status.
if they choose to leave their agreement, in order to dissolve they might need to pay back taxes as did bob jones university.
the glaring hypocrisy is modern evangelicalism that gladly converted their free churches to corporations of the state and remained "politically neutral" (ie quiet about moral issues) in order to keep it and now the chickens are coming home to roost
Dr. Tim wrote: Yes, penned, you have made your point about Jerusalem‚ÄĒover and over again. May I remind you that God was willing to spare Sodom if certain conditions were met (Genesis 18:23-32). Don‚Äôt you is even more willing to spare the very apple of His eyesuppose He
I think you just called spiritual Sodom the apple of God's eye.
there's nowhere for you to go with this.
the foundations of JMacs religion on display here.
by breaking up God's people into two groups, with two covenants, and that being the hermeneutic for reading the text.
you are left calling Sodom God's greatest pleasure and joy.
yet the text isn't saying that, is it?
and yet, that defies the whole message of the gospel, doesn't it?