|
|
USER COMMENTS BY HICHRIS |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 23 user comments posted recently. |
| |
|
|
3/21/11 2:41 PM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Rufus - Yahweh is the transliterated spelling of the Hebrew Proper name that God told to Abraham (YHWH). This name was incorrectly transliterated to Jehovah centuries ago; so Jehovah is Yahweh.That said Baal and Asherah were the male and female false deities of the Canaanites. As it is clear in the old testament many Israelites were led astray and worshiped them. And we know as well that idols were put in God's holy temple - that doesn't make any of them his wife. We know that only the Church is the Bride of Christ. |
|
|
8/2/10 9:41 AM |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
In most cases that I have seen, a 'mixed' religion marriage means that one or often both of the people aren't really religious. I would imagine that's the case here. |
|
|
3/17/09 10:34 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
I find a certain appeal to the articles suggestion - but this sort of thing is exactly what many who promote the homosexual agenda really want - the destruction of marriage and the family. Why do non-religious societies promote marriage anyway (many people are sadly opting not to these days!)? Marriage promotes the existence of families - a more stable life, and best situation to raise children. That's the rational for keeping marriage in a secular society and the reasons why there are legal advantages with taxes and inheritance. While the above reasons are true - the foundation of Marriage is in God. It was his will that man and woman be united as one - much like the picture of Christ uniting with his bride the Church. This illustration is vulgar to the anti-religious pro-homosexual groups. |
|
|
3/16/09 4:04 PM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
The article is brief and broad in describing Calvinism - too bad they lump everyone together (including the Mars Hill lot).From the article: "Skirmishes among the Southern Baptists (who have a competing non-Calvinist camp) and online "flame wars" bode badly." So as Robert suggested, let's keep THIS discussion free of those "flames". |
|
|
11/17/08 7:42 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John,I hope I'm not opening a can of worms. Why? Because the doctrines of those 'denominations' go against the Bible. Christians are charged to repent and put sin behind them - so continuing to go to a church that's main focus is not to preach Christ, leaves one open to false doctrine and means that one cannot truly share in the communion of the saints. Now if you were to ask, are there Christians in those churches, yes there are. And some are working to reform those churches, but too many sit silently - and appear to approve the false beliefs. |
|
|
9/26/08 11:12 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
EngineerI'm no fan of tatoos but if your going to use Leviticus 19 - do so in Context. Levticus 19:26-27 You shall not eat any flesh with the blood in it. You shall not interpret omens or tell fortunes. You shall not round off the hair on your temples or mar the edges of your beard Isn't blood and flesh part of a Kosher diet - do Christians have to eat Kosher? Are we also to avoid cutting our hair or beards? I do believe the OT is relevant and that all of the Bible shows the gospel. |
|
|
3/6/08 12:55 PM |
HiChris | | MI | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Ah yes the patron saint of Lutherans :-)Will this trend continue... St. Calvin , St. Arminius, St. Wesley, but let's not stop there. The Roman church is a big tent - they'll take 'em all. St. Joseph Smith, St. Rutherford, St. L. Ron Hubbard. |
|
|
|
Jump to Page : [1] 2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|