Thank you for your post but please do not use the censored term in your moniker or in the contents of a post. This "crude" term has unfortunately slipped into the Sermon Audio forum and will no longer be accepted by either perpertator or victim.
Razer Ramon wrote: How is it possible for Abigail to make consecutive comments without a whimper from the establishment and without a single removal by one Moderator Alpha who has chastened others for this practice?
Moderator Alpha, what say you?
Forum Policy: "Only one post at a time per thread (allow for alternate users)."
This posting rule has an "undocumented" exception. Consecutive posts will be accepted in the same thread upon the lapse of one hour from the time of a previous post.
There is no time restriction for posting in different threads.
Abigail wrote: Please tell me sir, how long should we wait between posts if no one posts in the meantime? I have not used different monikers to post. If we wait one hour before our next post, our comments are accepted by SA.
I'm embarrased to admit that I was unaware that a one hour wait was sufficient to allow a subsequent post. If this be the case (and I have no reason to believe otherwise) I apologize for the warning and thank you for the information.
Wayne M. wrote: Are the rules changed now so that a consecutive post cannot be made under a different thread?
No. The rule only applies to consecutive posts within the same thread and it now appears that consecutive posts are allowed upon a one hour wait between posts. I will be verifying this with the site owner.
Razer Ramon wrote: How is it possible for Abigail to make consecutive comments without a whimper from the establishment and without a single removal by one Moderator Alpha who has chastened others for this practice? Moderator Alpha, what say you?
You know the rules so I don't expect I'll need to remind you again. I'd recommend you check the "Remember this information for next time..." box and leave it checked.
kenny wrote: It was a lot more fun on here before Alpha the Moderator started removing all of the good posts from the WOMI.
I would not be here if the civility that existed as recently as two years ago prevailed in these threads today. I invite you and anyone else interested in seeing how far these discussions have degraded in the past two years to open any of the following threads sorted by oldest first and compare to now. This should not be so on a Christian discussion forum. Also note that the daily participation has decreased signicantly.
[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/survey_details.asp?voteid=bu112805195657&sortby=oldfirst#comments]]]Which doctrine do you adhere to?[/URL]
[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/survey_details.asp?voteid=pr82905231354&sortby=oldfirst#comments]]]What is the Scriptural mode of baptism?[/URL]
[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/survey_details.asp?voteid=le213051445&sortby=oldfirst#comments]]]How old do you believe the Earth to be?[/URL]
Spiritual wrote: I'm not sure what you are asking of me here.
What I am requiring is that you refrain from insulting a forum user or their spouse. I could not care less that the words you use to pass judgment are found in the bible. Remove the insulting judgmental language and your post will be allowed. If not they will be removed as was your most recent post.
Spiritual wrote: Moderator Alpha, Sir, what in the world compelled you to delete my post to Wayne? He asked a question and I answered, sufficiently and within right reason I think. It is essential that Wayne be allowed to read my response and I need to know exactly what you found offensive so I can repost. Normally, I wouldn't exert the additional effort, but this is vitally important for him. A matter, as Sister Abigail says, of life and death.
You may submit your post again without the personal attack on either the forum user or his spouse.
Your post was not removed because of anything you wrote but because of the quote from Spiritual's post.
You are a slow learner indeed. You are entitled to your beliefs of the spiritual state of others but you are not entitled to express those beliefs on this forum with trashy gutter talk. May I remind you of Saint Jude's words:
Jude 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
Weapon of Mass Instruction wrote: Let me guess, there is a new definition out for crude language in the F_anciful L_and of the Calvinist.
Forum policies are not up for debate nor are they subject to your interpretation. They appear in red letters in the "Add or Reply to comment" window. Furthermore, by submitting your comment you agree to the policies as stated immediately above the "Submit Comment" button:
"By submitting your comment for review you agree to the forum policies."
Continued disregard for the policies will result in additional measures taken. This should not be that difficult for a Christian to comprehend and appreciate. It's up to you.
KK wrote: The Dems are ******** nuts -- NO MORAL CODE !!!
Your post was removed because of the censored word in this comment. I know this is not typical of your posts but please be careful when using slang in your posts because most slang words are replacements for something you would never say.
Spiritual wrote: when you demand I clean up my comments, this can mean nothing more than that I present I desensitized, downgraded, sanitized gospel more palatable to sinners, heretics, and heathens.
It means what it means; abide by the forum policies which you agree to when you submit a comment for review or your comment will be removed. The rules are not up for debate or subject to your interpretation. If that is insufficient to restore civility to the thread additional measures may be taken. That is what it means.
It has become blatantly obvious that you are once again posting with two different aliases in complete disregard of the forum policy. Please make an immediate end of your muli-part post and refrain from this practice in the future to avoid a thread closure.