Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
1089

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -4 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only - Legacy

 
BIBLE, SOCIETY, TECH, PERSONAL SURVEYS | FAVORITES CREATE NEW

All Categories |  Bible & Theology Issues
478 total votes have been cast on this survey | 110 user comments  ( edit survey )

Do you understand & believe in 'the Doctrine of Original Sin'?
Created: 12/16/2008 | Last Vote: 6 years ago | Comment: 14 years ago
Disclaimer: These surveys are created by PLUS or FULL Members of the site and, unless specified, are not created by the SermonAudio staff nor do they necessarily reflect the site's position on any topic.

 •   Yes, I understand and believe that doctrine to be true.
  90% | 430 votes

 •   No, I understand what that doctrine is, but I do not believe it to be true.
  4% | 20 votes

 •   No, I do not understand that doctrine.
  2% | 8 votes

 •   No, I have never heard of that doctrine.
  1% | 4 votes

 •   No answer. Skip this survey, I do not care to vote on this topic.
  3% | 16 votes

   

Subscribe to these comments


   11 votes  |  Do you homeschool your children? • 14 years ago
   105 votes  |  Is the 4th commandment binding in the New Covenant? • 14 years ago
   91 votes  |  How many hours a week do you spend in your occupation providing... • 14 years ago
   130 votes  |  How would you describe Brit Hume's recommendation of the... • 14 years ago
   169 votes  |  Do You Celebrate The Christmas Holiday? • 14 years ago
BROWSE SURVEY CATEGORIES | MORE..
   2,768 votes  |  Do you believe ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED? • 4 months ago
   698 votes  |  Which issue do you think most confronts the Church of today? • 4 months ago
   517 votes  |  What kind of car do you drive? • 4 years ago
   639 votes  |  Should Christians Observe Halloween • 4 years ago
   385 votes  |  Other than the Bible which other book would you also recommend... • 4 years ago
BROWSE SURVEY CATEGORIES | MORE..
This feature is for PLUS or FULL members only. Please log in first | or learn more about favorites.
   9,506 votes  |  What version of the Bible do you use? • 5590 comments
   6,045 votes  |  What is your view of women pastors? • 873 comments
   5,907 votes  |  Do you think the Pope went to heaven? • 1482 comments
   5,304 votes  |  Are you Presbyterian, Methodist, or Baptist? • 444 comments
   4,558 votes  |  How old are you? To determine the SermonAudio age groups... • 111 comments
BROWSE SURVEY CATEGORIES | MORE..
FORUMS | USER COMMENTS | add new  

    Sorting Order:  

· Page 1 ·  Found: 110 user comment(s)

Survey3/29/10 9:08 PM
Michael Hranek | Endicott, New York  Find all comments by Michael Hranek
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
John UK wrote:
Too true, bro! And ....
John UK
I appreciate your post.

BUT on the other hand

The Bible Facts wrote:
This is ....
Dear
'The Bible Facts' person (so called)
As politely as I might.

I believe you have a serious missunderstanding here. One that has apparently led you to justifying making blatant false accusation.

Reformed/Calvinists do in fact observe through a glass darkly (as all of us do until we might stand in the fulness of the Presence of Christ) important and significant truths in Scripture.

But like the Pharisees before you, "It is your abuse of these truths that I object to". For example the Sabbath was very much in Scripture. Jesus kept the Sabbath but not at all in the way the Pharisees approved of, did He!

And you might remember The Savior had serious conflict with these experts in Religion because when everything was said and done with all their Religious knowledge they really didn't know God, let alone show the Love and Grace of God to others, or let's say...to sinners did they.

And thank you so much for reminding me how much I need to follow Christ and not the prostyles of Calvin.


Survey3/29/10 2:44 PM
The Bible Facts  Find all comments by The Bible Facts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Michael Hranek wrote:
Whereas an imbalance on His Sovereignity (the total inability of man and the irresistable grace of God taken to the extreme) can give a very distorted dishonoring protrayal of God
This is the typical ROMAN CATHOLIC and ARMINIAN salvation by WORKS theory.

Michael denies that the sinner is dead in sin as the Bible teaches.

"And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins" Eph 2:1

"Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved)" Eph 2:5

"And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;" Col 2:13

Michael also denies that God's grace is irresistible.
Yet Jesus Himself declares.

"All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out." John 6:37
AND
"And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day." John 6:39
AND
"No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day." John 6:44 and 65.

Total Depravity and Irresistible Grace are Bible Facts.


Survey3/29/10 6:25 AM
John UK | Wales  Contact via emailFind all comments by John UK
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Michael Hranek wrote:
And IMHO why would we ever expect sinners to have genuine sorrow and repentance and real God given faith to come to Christ to be saved...if they are presented with a warped portrayal of God?
Too true, bro! And it is also worth bearing in mind that our witness for Christ is, in part, our portayal of God by the way we speak to sinners, the manner in which we address them. We can certainly be full of humility, unpatronising, preaching as dying men to dying men, speech full of grace and salt, seeking to persuade men that there is in the atonement of the cross a full pardon for sin, if they will only (also) confess themselves sinners and cry out to God to be merciful to them through the propitiation of blood.

For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
Romans 10:13-14 KJV

There is still a harvest, and still there are sheaves to be brought in.


Survey3/29/10 6:04 AM
Michael Hranek | Endicott, New York  Find all comments by Michael Hranek
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Wayne M. wrote:
Michael,
The answer to this question as to why men are seemly free to choose and yet God has predetermined events beforehand is another of the mysteries it appears is not given to us to fully understand.
Wayne M
I appreciate this post.

Perhaps you might see openly admitting we do not have God all figured out allows us to preach the Truth of God such as:
"He is good and ready to forgive and abounds in mercy to all who call upon Him" (IMHO this honors His character)

Whereas an imbalance on His Sovereignity (the total inability of man and the irresistable grace of God taken to the extreme) can give a very distorted dishonoring protrayal of God than how He truly and wonderfully is.

And IMHO why would we ever expect sinners to have genuine sorrow and repentance and real God given faith to come to Christ to be saved...if they are presented with a warped portrayal of God?

I know now that as a Catholic boy I was presented a very distorted twisted even blasphemous image of God and of Christ (along with the wicked idol of the RCC Virgin) Certainly not the Truth that leads men to salvation, that leads men to love the Savior.


Survey3/28/10 9:36 PM
Wayne M. | northwest British Columbia  Find all comments by Wayne M.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Michael Hranek wrote:
Wayne M
Wow! How far do you want to go with this? Would you deride sinners as being fully responsible and accountable for all their sins when you seem to be implying God is so directly in control of everything,
Michael,
The answer to this question as to why men are seemly free to choose and yet God has predetermined events beforehand is another of the mysteries it appears is not given to us to fully understand.

Would you concede that there is much teaching in Scripture that shows God is sovereign in the affairs of men and predetermines what comes to pass?

"For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done." Acts 4:27,28

Would you agree that people choose to do evil while at the same time God has predetermined what will come to pass? Obviously this is something we cannot comprehend. We accept other doctrines which we cannot fully understand; why not this one?


Survey3/28/10 9:00 AM
John UK | Wales  Contact via emailFind all comments by John UK
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Michael Hranek wrote:
John UK
I put it with a different emphasis...
The only hope for sinners is The Cross, in Jesus Christ who died for us there!
And Oh! How The Cross speaks of the charater and nature of God...completely and absolutely Holy and purest Love and Truth itself.
Ah yes, I won't disagree with you there bro. But you won't find a baby who can understand that. And then you've got to look at the reason why Jesus came and died for sinners. Did he come to make salvation possible for all? Or did he come to secure the salvation of all? Or did he come to secure the salvation of some?

The answer you give to this question will determine much.


Survey3/28/10 8:19 AM
Michael Hranek | Endicott, New York  Find all comments by Michael Hranek
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
John UK wrote:
And so the only hope for such is that God has chosen them unto salvation, and thus brings them to new birth simply from his good purpose, independent of an infant's understanding.
John UK
I put it with a different emphasis...

The only hope for sinners is The Cross, in Jesus Christ who died for us there!

And Oh! How The Cross speaks of the charater and nature of God...completely and absolutely Holy and purest Love and Truth itself.


Survey3/28/10 7:14 AM
Michael Hranek | Endicott, New York  Find all comments by Michael Hranek
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Grouptwo wrote:
Michael Hranek

How come you disagree with Bible men Spurgeon and Paul Washer

Grouptwo (I sure hope you are )

What makes you think you agree with Spurgeon or Washer....but even more importantly with what God Himself says to us about Himself and what He requires of us in the Bible?

From what I gather Spurgeon who called himself a Calvinist didn't get along greatly with THE Calvinists of his day (and many calling themselves Calvinists today are quite a bit different than him as well)...

...and Washer in my words testifies of being blessed by Leonard Ravenhill more than a bunch of dead (cold) Calvinists, oops and Washer also speaks well of and how essential(rather than maligns) the ministry of the Holy Spirit in the lives of individual believers.

I have observed this before that some seem far more interested that people be conformed to Calvinism (or Reformed Theology) than they are of people coming to know Christ in Salvation in the New Birth...and I might add in being conformed to the image of the Son of God, of loving Him and following Him and serving Him and proclaiming Him that others might believe in Him.

And isn't this along the lines of what you posted to me? It sure seems to be.


Survey3/28/10 6:53 AM
John UK | Wales  Contact via emailFind all comments by John UK
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Michael Hranek wrote:
The other group faithfully presented God according to who (how) God truly is and made disciples...
Ah yes I see where you are going now, Michael.

If you heard Spurgeon or the contemporary, Peter Masters, I don't think you'd have a problem with the way they present the Lord.

I have found these texts informative:

Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men....
2 Corinthians 5:11a KJV

For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead: And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again.
2 Corinthians 5:14-15 KJV

Of course, if Christ died for all, then obviously all were 'dead in trespasses and sins', weren't they? This must include infants, or you have to say that Christ did not die for all. And if an infant is 'dead in sins' then they must be born again, to be able to go to heaven.

And so the only hope for such is that God has chosen them unto salvation, and thus brings them to new birth simply from his good purpose, independent of an infant's understanding.


Survey3/28/10 6:45 AM
Grouptwo  Find all comments by Grouptwo
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Michael Hranek
"preprogrammed or controlled biological spiritual machine"

Michael

You seem to have an aversion to reading anything Reformed and eschew commentaries, yet what is any man on sermon audio posting 'comments'- his own interpreter? Opps, silly me! Michael relies on the Spirit of Truth to guide him in all things, so the Reformed faith is heresy and belongs to your first group? Or you have not understood the Doctrines of Grace by the conviction of the HS? How come you disagree with Bible men Spurgeon and Paul Washer, or are you 'more spiritual'?

"Calvinism robs the individual of responsibility for his/her own conduct, making a person into a puppet on a string or a robot programmed from birth to death with no will of his/her own."

Here, sadly, we encounter blatant misrepresentation of the Calvinistic position. And it is this very shallow, very inaccurate representation of the Reformed doctrines of grace that call forth this response. Nothing is accomplished when one misrepresents the opposition. "Straw man" argumentation only confuses, it does not help.

[URL=http://vintage.aomin.org/DoctrinesLead.html]]]Heard it all before[/URL]

Michael why not examine the above article link...your 'spiritual machine' is gross misrepresentaion


Survey3/28/10 5:47 AM
Michael Hranek | Endicott, New York  Find all comments by Michael Hranek
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
John UK wrote:
Good morning Brother Michael
I see you are embarking on an exciting journey in your spiritual life; the understanding and reconciling of seeming paradoxes in God's word.

The third is your current one, the doctrine of mans' complete responsibility for his own actions while also holding God's complete sovereignty. I wish you well as you grapple with this.

John UK
Good Morning!

Actually I am not grappling so much with election, predestination and the responsibility of man but more along the lines of the true character and nature of God

There were two groups of people who both had the Scriptures, the 39 Books of the Old Testament.

One group greatly missrepresented God and His commandments, covenant, promises according to the commandments and traditions of men (we might say according to human scholarship) and made proselytes. BTW they could still identify the place of Messiah's birth.

The other group faithfully presented God according to who (how) God truly is and made disciples...brought people to know of and to trust in God as He really is, to repent of their sin, to learn of and from Him personally love Him, follow Him and serve Him.

The first group didn't really know God and hated the second who did.


Survey3/28/10 4:32 AM
John UK | Wales  Contact via emailFind all comments by John UK
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Good morning Brother Michael

I see you are embarking on an exciting journey in your spiritual life; the understanding and reconciling of seeming paradoxes in God's word.

The first one you have already got so far, and found you could go no further, namely, the doctrine of the Trinity, where three Persons are one God.

The second is the doctrine of the Person of Christ, who is both fully God and fully Man at one and the same time. Again, you can only go so far, and say that you believe it, even though not fully understanding.

The third is your current one, the doctrine of mans' complete responsibility for his own actions while also holding God's complete sovereignty. I wish you well as you grapple with this.

I personally believe all the above doctrines, without being able to articulate them or fully understand them. The third I barely understand at all, yet believe it with all my heart.

If it were not so, my salvation would depend on "my performance in relation to God's redeeming actions" and I would have no peace 24/7. I think you will find this is more akin to Catholicism (with its seven sacraments), than Reformed Christianity, which biblically believes that God has Done It All!

p.s. This includes Baptist 1689 confessional believers.


Survey3/27/10 11:44 PM
Michael Hranek | Endicott, New York  Find all comments by Michael Hranek
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Wayne M. wrote:
Does God permit the universe to run itself as if it is an out of control aircraft or is God in control with an eternal purpose?
Wayne M
Wow! How far do you want to go with this? Would you deride sinners as being fully responsible and accountable for all their sins when you seem to be implying God is so directly in control of everything, everybody including their thoughts, motives and actions even making men totally unable to choose anything different that what God directly wills them to choose (oops that would make them nothing more than a preprogrammed or controlled biological spiritual machine)....which would make God's character to be what?

Wayne, you seem to be dodging just how we should present the character of God. When Jehovah hid Moses in the cleft of the rock and passed by him what did He say when He proclaimed His Name (or if you are willing His nature, His being) to Him?

Does not Jehovah begin with...
Compassionate? Merciful kjv

IMHO Jesus expresses the character of God quite differently from how the religious traditions of men present the character of God, and I believe it is far safer to listen to what Jesus says than the opinions of men. How about you?


Survey3/27/10 10:35 PM
Wayne M. | northwest British Columbia  Find all comments by Wayne M.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Michael Hranek wrote:
Or just a "robotic" elect?
Is the term "robotic" elect an insult to God who "who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will"? Eph. 1:11

Does God permit the universe to run itself as if it is an out of control aircraft or is God in control with an eternal purpose?

"According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord." Eph. 3:11

"Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and one of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father. But the very hairs of your head are numbered." Matt.10:29,30

Are the free acts of men both free and predestined? "Woe unto the world because offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!" Matt.18:7

Are the evil (and good) actions of men predetermined and at the same time freely performed?

Do christians repent, believe, and seek to do God's will because they want to? Is this because God works in them by the Holy Spirit.

"For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure." Phil. 2:13


Survey3/27/10 7:46 PM
Michael Hranek | Endicott, New York  Find all comments by Michael Hranek
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Wayne M. wrote:
One Reformed writer says Scripture tells us divine election is not conditioned upon something in the creature, but rather upon something in God. It is the good pleasure, the delight of God, which is the basis of election. Beyond that, who are we to question what or why God does certain things?
The fact is all are fallen and deserving of the wrath of God. The fact He saves even some is due to the mercy and gracious character of God.
"Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth." Romans 9:18
Another Reformed writer says "He will display the perfection of his holiness by wrath against sin in the destruction of the wicked, and he will display the perfection of his mercy and love in saving the elect." Is there anyone who would question the wisdom of God in doing this?
Wayne M
So what do you think?
When Jesus Christ Himself says:

"For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life."

Did Jesus know what He was talking about? Did He really mean the whole world? In what He says is there really a Promise that sinners can believe, and call upon His Name to be saved? Or just a "robotic" elect?


Survey3/27/10 7:24 PM
John UK | Wales  Contact via emailFind all comments by John UK
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Mike wrote:
Pardon the interruption, John. But why then do we decry abortion at all? God was going to destroy most of them anyway. Isn't destruction their lot? As for the aborted elect, it must be, according to some, they were predestined to this fate. How do they live with such an imagined God?
Mike, those that live with such an imagined God are surely most miserable, and miss out on many of the blessings God designs for his people. Take good doctrine to an extreme and it becomes more severe error than bad doctrine.

But as for destruction being "their lot", as if "they" are somehow separated from the rest of the world and are predestinated unto destruction, as if God takes delight in showing men his greater power over them and destroys them to prove that, no, I don't believe that is the way of it. I personally see all men as guilty and therefore destined for destruction which is our just desert. God could justly leave it there and destroy all men, and there would be no argument.

It is only because God has chosen to be merciful to some, for reasons unknown to me, that there is any debate at all. It happened at the flood, when God showed Noah and his family grace and destroyed the rest of the world.


Survey3/27/10 7:23 PM
Wayne M. | northwest British Columbia  Find all comments by Wayne M.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Michael Hranek wrote:
Wayne M
Are you sure about this?
Am I misstaken or are you "Reformed"?
And do not the "Reformed" essentially teach that God is completely and absolutely sovereign in and over all things arbitarily predestines and elects certain ones to salvation because all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all the rest He would essentially arbitarily predestinate to the eternal hell.
One Reformed writer says Scripture tells us divine election is not conditioned upon something in the creature, but rather upon something in God. It is the good pleasure, the delight of God, which is the basis of election. Beyond that, who are we to question what or why God does certain things?

The fact is all are fallen and deserving of the wrath of God. The fact He saves even some is due to the mercy and gracious character of God.

"Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth." Romans 9:18

Another Reformed writer says "He will display the perfection of his holiness by wrath against sin in the destruction of the wicked, and he will display the perfection of his mercy and love in saving the elect." Is there anyone who would question the wisdom of God in doing this?


Survey3/27/10 7:16 PM
Michael Hranek | Endicott, New York  Find all comments by Michael Hranek
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
formikal wrote:
You are still entrenched in the Roman Catholic teaching of your youth Michael. You appear to consider that God cannot save you without your help.
formikal
Ah just who would be entrenched in a Roman Catholic (Augustinian) Worldview one of the devote Reformed or a Baptist type believer.

Ah you do know the Reformed put great weight upon the teachings of Augustine the same Augustine the RCC claims as ...a doctor of their false religion if I am remembering correctly. While basically us simple mined Baptist type believers look to the Bible.

I sure hope you aren't accusing the RCC of holding to Biblical Truth are you.


Survey3/27/10 6:46 PM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
John UK wrote:
---
Possible, but so unlikely.
But if true, it makes abortionists the direct cause of salvation for many babes.
Pardon the interruption, John. But why then do we decry abortion at all? God was going to destroy most of them anyway. Isn't destruction their lot? As for the aborted elect, it must be, according to some, they were predestined to this fate. How do they live with such an imagined God?

Survey3/27/10 6:18 PM
formikal  Find all comments by formikal
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Michael Hranek wrote:
do not the "Reformed" essentially teach that God is completely and absolutely sovereign in and over all things arbitarily predestines and elects certain ones to salvation because all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all the rest He would essentially arbitarily predestinate to the eternal hell
You are still entrenched in the Roman Catholic teaching of your youth Michael. You appear to consider that God cannot save you without your help.

There are a total of 110 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments

Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 | last




Ken Wimer
Transforming Grace

Epistle to the Romans
Sunday Service
Shreveport Grace Church
Play! | MP4 | RSS


The Day the Sun Stood Still

Mark S. Wisniewski
Medicina Fuerte Y Buena

Hebreos 2024 - Spanish
Iglesia Nueva Obra en...
Play! | MP3

Dr. Fred DeRuvo
Warning Signs

End Times/Last Days
Study-Grow-Know Ministries
Video!Play! | MP4

Bob Vincent
How to Win the War on Terror

The Middle East
Sermons by Bob and Others
Play! | MP3

Sponsor:
New Podcast for Pastors from NAMB

Join podc­ast host, Ken Whitten & guests Tony Dungy, H.B. Charlr­es, Jr. & more.
https://www.namb.net/podcas..

Sermon: CH#139 The Deity of Christ
Dr. James M. Phillips

SPONSOR

SPONSOR



SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
TECH TALKS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Stats
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Webcast | Multicast
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Podcasting
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription
Business Cards
QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
API v2.0 New!

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

THE VAULT VLOG
The Day the Sun Stood Still
Copyright © 2024 SermonAudio.