At one time George Barna and his ilk told us that the wave of the future was that all churches would have to become "seeker sensitive" and culturally relevant in order to survive in the next millennium. Via books like Barna’s User Friendly Churches (1991) they helped drive a revolution that has virtually wiped out the traditional church model in evangelicalism. Now that the mega-church seeker-sensitive model they once supported so vociferously is proving to be a failure, increasingly rejected by the very culture it strove so hard to please, they are producing books like Barna's latest entitled Revolution which pushes "house churches" or simply being “spiritual” at home and work as the next wave of the future, a movement which if it succeeds will help to destroy many of America's struggling fellowships to replace them with a rudderless, leaderless, "do whatever seems good in your own eyes" conglomeration of extended bible studies.

Why is that?

Barna lives straddling two worlds. He is a modern American evangelical and a pollster and his ecclesiology is driven by these two facets of his life. Many Reformed believers assume that the theology of modern American evangelicals has been primarily influenced by the long term effects of revivalism in the 19th century, but what they fail to take into consideration was that the theology of 19th century revivalists like Charles Finney was actually molded in the crucible of American culture with all of its assumptions. For instance, if we want to know what shaped Finney's assumptions regarding salvation all we have to look to is the psyche of the American society of the time; it's not surprising therefore to hear him speak of saving souls in the same way that the average American would speak of how one should farm or successfully run a business: "the connection between the right use of means for a revival, and a revival, is as philosophically sure as between the right use of means to raise grain, and a crop of wheat." We tend to think of the "corporate" or "consumer" model of the church as a 20th century invention, but it really is a creation of the 19th. What the church came to value in the 19th century were the same things the culture valued - success - and a success that could be categorized and most importantly quantified. If we have an increase in the number of consumers of our product, we are doing well, if not then we are failing and either our marketing or perhaps even the product itself need to change in order to make them more appealing.

As a Pollster, Barna is even more sensitive than the average evangelical to the importance of popularity. In large measure, modern American evangelicalism has been shaped by men like Barna, with an eye to being as popular and appealing as possible. However, the church that they have created is failing on several fronts. Ironically, the very drive to make the church as popular as possible has also made it as shallow, transient, and as disposable as any modern American plastic consumer product. The fact that 88%* of the youth raised in these churches will abandon the faith by their first year of college, is a reflection that the product itself has little impact or value. It has also made for churches that are, in large measure, indistinguishable from the pop culture they are trying to mimic. Not surprisingly the abomination of the worldly yesterday’s-pop-culture church that Barna and his co-laborers helped to birth now repulses them and they are increasingly rejecting it. A lot of "emergents" also fall into this category. Above all, they are beginning to recognize that the seeker church has become an obsolete product now only frequented, by and large, by the people who grew up using it and are consequently "brand loyal" (newsflash - the only people who really demand "seeker sensitive" worship aren't seekers, they are the Christian boomers and gen-Xers who have frequented these churches for years - this is their "traditional comfort zone").

So, what do you do now that the "seeker" model churches are failing to do what they were created to do, attract new consumers, or even to keep the children of the old consumers? Well if quantifiable success continues to be our aim, we don't have much other choice but to change the product. The "house church model" is simply an appeal to what they think consumers in this generation want.

The sad thing is that the biblical model for a church will never be an option for them. They simply don't feel it will "succeed" according to the polls, and with the Finney's of the 19th century all they really trust are human means and methods. If you can't plot it on a poll, it doesn't exist. The idea that God might actually bless a simple, apostolic, model for his church, and bring people to faith through it, and cause it to thrive - even under persecution - doesn't even register with them. And because such a church model doesn't support growth beyond say the 200 member mark, it doesn't fit the modern consumer criterion for success. They are all about reaching everyone in the culture and as a result they are always failing.

Were they to realize that the work of the church involves the ingathering and building up of the elect, that the church in every age is made up of a faithful remnant, that the church is supposed to be as profoundly different from the culture as light is to darkness, and that the direction of scripture alone really is sufficient for the task of building the church, things might change profoundly. As it is, men like Barna are setting themselves up for a continuous cycle of failure that will only do greater and greater harm to the body of Christ, especially as their methods become more and more desperate and unscriptural.

If anyone were to ask me what the church needs most about now is not Barna's newest "revolution" its a REFORMATION that returns us to the simple, biblical, church of the Scripture, regardless of what the culture thinks of those churches.

But hey that's just the way the totally uncool and unhip Pastor of a "can't possibly work" church sees it.

* A recent SBC poll indicated that 88% of the youth raised in evangelical churches stop attending church by the first year of college.