Trump Tells '60 Minutes': 'I'm Pro-Life. The Judges Will Be Pro-Life'
In an interview Sunday with CBSâ€™s â€ś60 Minutes,â€ť President-elect Donald Trump said he is pro-life and would appoint pro-life judges, adding that if Roe v. Wade is overturned, â€śit would go back to the states.
â€śTheyâ€™ll be pro-life,â€ť Trump said about the judges he would appoint. â€śTheyâ€™ll be in terms of the whole gun situation, we know the 2nd Amendment and everybodyâ€™s talking about the 2nd Amendment, and theyâ€™re trying to dice it up and change it. Theyâ€™re going to be very pro-2nd Amendment, but having to do with abortion, what it-- if it ever were overturned, it would go back to the states, so it would go back to the states,â€ť Trump said....
Frank wrote: examples of how societal pressures and mores have led to the dilution of Christâ€™s church ...illogical unscientific concept of evolution is largely accepted with the bar being lowered to theistic evolution; In this manner absolute truth doesnâ€™t exist since the bar is continually being lowered.
Great list- playing off Evilution lie, as analogy to the church [URL=http://creation.com/gu-sanford2]]]Dr John Sanford on 100 mutations per generation [/URL]
Real Science now knows EACH human generation degrades by 100 deleterious mutation at least - an alarming depressing rate of collapse of mental and physical collapse. "Why Are We Not Dead 1000 Times Over?" Titled pages by PhD experts in genetics face the terror of doom on human race [Dr Sanford, a Christian , is certain Christ will return soon to preclude extinction]. Evilutionism's lie of millions of years is stymied by facts of exponentially multiplied disease. But the Church itself degrades with "mutations" you list dragging the apostates into collapse- "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;" Titus 3:5 That is Balm of Gilead to "salve" us.
Here are some good examples of how societal pressures and mores have led to the dilution of Christâ€™s church resulting in compromising even the basic principles of biblical morality. Feminism is no longer even argued, but the argument is now with radical feminism; homosexuality is no longer argued, but the bar has been lowered to "gay" marriage; abortion as de facto murder is seldom noted, but now the bar has been lowered to debating reasons for abortions or for partial birth abortions; the illogical unscientific concept of evolution is largely accepted with the bar being lowered to theistic evolution; divorce is tolerated to the point where there are no consequences either in our pulpits or in our congregations; saving sex for marriage is ridiculed and the bar has been lowered to a level that I canâ€™t even define and the list could go on and on and on and on ad infinitum. The common thread that runs through this short list of compromises is that when something becomes legal and/or intellectually or morally acceptable to the â€śworldâ€ť, then the church abandons the strict narrow positions of scripture and simply lowers the bar or eliminates the bar altogether.
In this manner absolute truth doesnâ€™t exist since the bar is continually being lowered.
NRTL Is Offered $10,000 to Name One Pro-Life Justice: See this offer also at Yahoo News, Denver Post, Covenant News, Houston Chronicle, CNBC, etc. To demonstrate the failure of National RTL's legal strategy, American RTL is offering them $10,000 if their president Wanda Franz can name a single Justice sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court who has ever acknowledged, even in a dissenting opinion, that the unborn child has a right to life." But wasn't Antonin Scalia pro-life? Regarding a law that would recognize the baby's God-given right to life, Scalia, the Justice most often claimed as pro-life, has said, "I will... strike down a law that is the opposite of Roe v. Wade... One wants no state to be able to prohibit abortion and the other one wants every state to have to prohibit abortion, and they're both wrong..." In 2004 Scalia claimed, "Take the abortion issue... there's something to be said for both sides." And on April 9, 2008 Scalia said, "You want the right to abortion? Create it the way most rights are created in a democracy. Persuade your fellow citizens it's a good idea - and pass a law." [URL=http://prolifeprofiles.com/national-right-to-life]]]Re-Think[/URL] RePENT is reThink - abolishionists cynical of SAMEold failed stregegy- focus on the strategy!!
Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed, for in the image of God made he man. (Genesis 9:6) AV. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whore mongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters. and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, which is the second death. (Revelation 21:8) AV.
Donald Trump says he will appoint Constitutional Supreme Court Justices who stand for life of the unborn and he has stated that he will stand for the life of the unbornâ€¦
WE SHALL SEE
We all know Hillary Clinton's position â€“â€“â€“ she doesn't care if they're in the last trimester â€“â€“ she's for aborting them â€“â€“ or I should say murdering them utilizing the partial birth abortion method
Even with all the fraud committed by the Clintons/Democratic machine Trump still defeated her because people with backbone showed up at the polls â€“â€“ unlike many indecisive ill-informed cowards throughout this country who lack the intellect and depth of character to stand up and be counted â€“â€“â€“ non-participants in the American process have no room to talk...
Thank God Donald Trump was elected â€“â€“â€“ now we just need to get to the bottom of all the fraud that was committed â€“â€“â€“ MILLIONS of illegal aliens voted and that's just the tip of the iceberg
On the one hand, Trump told Leslie Stahl during an interview aired Sunday on "60 Minutes," the issue of marriage equality, "was already settled." "You have these cases that have already gone to the Supreme Court. They've been settled, and I'm fine with that," Trump said.
He contradicts himself! The supreme court also is responsible for abortion becoming legal, so if he thinks one isn't 'changeable', how is the other changeable? He talks out of both sides of his mouth.
As a Christian, I'm against abortion under all circumstances.
What's the big deal here? What does "the Judges will be pro-life" mean? They truly won't be, because being pro-life means seeing (reverently) it (sanctity of all the unborn) as God sees it, without exception (case of rape or incest) or qualification. It wasn't overturned when the church of Rome's representative, Scalia, was on the court. What has changed? At the end of the day, it will go back to the states, where most of the states will enact laws to "ban" abortion, but makes exceptions as they did previously for rape or incest. Man I'd hate to be the fetus that was aborted simply by reason of circumstance or sin not my own.
Yes , Mike that is what he said on 60 minutes. Probably because he's big on gay rights and just came around on abortion. But then Leslie Stall had him repudiate crime in the name of Trump. Seriously, why do you think in Lubbock Texas , I could count on my hand trump bumper stickers or yard signs. It wasn't because we didn't vote for him it's because a few of us like our teeth in our mouths and our children not beaten at school.
Wayfarer Pilgrim wrote: I'm still confused as how sodomite faux marriage is " settled law", and " roe v Wade" is not. Anyhow, strict constitutional interpretation of the law would be refreshing but not necessarily going to change the Roberts court.
There is no settled law. If that is what Trump said, he's wrong on it. If SC proclamations were settled law, black people would still be considered 3/5 of a human. The supreme Ct sometimes make bad decisions, and their rulings have been overturned.
I'm still confused as how sodomite faux marriage is " settled law", and " roe v Wade" is not. Anyhow, strict constitutional interpretation of the law would be refreshing but not necessarily going to change the Roberts court.
Trump's pick could be much more than "pro-life" [URL=http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/donald-trump-wins-supreme-court-214449]]]http://tinyurl.com/jqajtos (How President Trump Could Reshape the Supreme Courtâ€”and the Country)[/URL]- "The most lasting legacy of the Trump presidency could be the judges he appoints to the highest court. Hereâ€™s what that could look like...."