Former FBI says only way to defeat Islam is to crush it
John Guandolo is a former FBI agent who created and implemented the FBI's first Counterterrorism Training/Education Program. He is co-author of Sharia - The Threat to America. Guandolo says the western world needs to recognize that radical Islam is a threat that is not going away, and no amount of wishing it away or talking to it or negotiating with it is going to stop it.
"What stopped the Nazis was we killed and crushed them on the field of battle,â€ť he says. â€śWhat stopped the Communists is we did the same thing on the fields of battle in places where the Soviet Communists were supporting actual warfare."
And Guandolo says that's what's going to end the war against the jihadists....
If you don't like President Obama's approach to the Middle East, you certainly aren't going to like Rand Paul's [URL=http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/31/us/politics/kochs-network-wrestles-with-expectations-for-presidential-primaries.html?ribbon-ad-idx=8&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article]]]Kochsâ€™ Network Wrestles With Expectations for Presidential Primaries[/URL]
[URL=http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0704/mason_2004_07_07.php3]]]Islam is a religion of WHAT? -- Part 1[/URL] and [URL=http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0804/mason_2004_08_03.php3]]]Islam is a religion of WHAT? II: A response to our critics[/URL]. So, it was written 10 years ago. One can see that nothing has changed to good, short articles.
[URL=http://www.danielpipes.org/2226/identifying-moderate-muslims]]]Identifying Moderate Muslims[/URL] easier said than done.
Lurker wrote: God bless you, brother, for asking. Your kindness over the years has been precious to me not to mention your wit and humor which often gives me a much needed chuckle. God knows better than me what His plans for the balance of my life is so I would only ask that His will be done in my life and He give me the strength to meet each day's challenges.
Will pray that way, Lurker. And thanks also for your kind remarks, even unto a premil such as myself. Much appreciated, though I don't think me particularly humorous.
Why John UK, you might have gotten it, the translators of the KJV used these verses to explain why they put out a new translation,
1 Corinthians 14:9 So also you, unless you utter by the tongue speech that is clear, how will it be known what is spoken? For you will be speaking into the air. 1 Corintians 14:11 If then I do not know the meaning of the language, I shall be to the one who speaks a barbarian, and the one who speaks will be a barbarian to me. ---[URL=http://www.lockman.org/nasb/nasbcmp.php]]]NASB[/URL]
and of course that is why people sensibly knew that the KJV had to be replaced!
Ah, Lurker, I guess we won't go into great discussion of [URL=https://www.raptureready.com/featured/ice/Zechariah-Preterism.html]]]https://www.raptureready.com/featured/ice/Zechariah-Preterism.html(Preterism and Zechariah 12â€”14)[/URL] or for that matter, [URL=http://www.raptureme.com/featured/ice/AmillennialismAndPostmillennialism.html]]]http://www.raptureme.com/featured/ice/AmillennialismAndPostmillennialism.html (The Unscriptural Theologies Of Amillennialism And Postmillennialism)[/URL] either. But, yes, we have drifted from the fact that of the [URL=http://www.answering-islam.org/Books/Barton/11.htm]]]http://www.answering-islam.org/Books/Barton/11.htm (Inadequacy of Islam)[/URL
Unprofitable Servant wrote: I Corinthians 14 14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful. 15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.
Okay, you got me.
In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Thank you very much.
Lurker wrote: Good morning, brother. Yes, I did see your post and I agree.... we need to keep in touch especially in these dark days. So much trouble all over the world. I have a tendency to go quite when my spirit is low and its been that way most of this year. I'll make it a point to update you and please do the same when you're up to it. Blessings to you and yours.
Observer wrote: Hey bro Lurker Hope you saw my last to you. Jim ain't too interested in correct exegesis and hermeneutics. Why waste brain cells when you can have your pastor tell you what to believe? Sometimes I'm left wondering if Gil's middle name ain't Pope!
Good morning, brother.
Yes, I did see your post and I agree.... we need to keep in touch especially in these dark days. So much trouble all over the world. I have a tendency to go quite when my spirit is low and its been that way most of this year. I'll make it a point to update you and please do the same when you're up to it.
Blessings to you and yours.
. . .
I didn't realize that your comment to which I first replied was off topic so no need to reply further. I don't want to be responsible for taking the thread further off topic. Btw, I did read the article you recommended as well as the entire book of Zechariah (again) before I responded below. There is no biblical support for either the preterist POV of Zech 12-14 or the dispensational futurist view with all its huge gaps spread all over the prophets. The HS is an infinitely better Author of the organic whole of the bible than that..... Think.
Jim Lincoln wrote: Try this one, Lurker (look over the entire article please. ) Thomas Ice wrote: A preterist cannot give a textual interpretation of Zechariah 12â€”14 because they believe it is to be equated with God's judgment at the hands of the Romans in A . D . 70 upon Israel...
Preterist? You think preterism is the only alternative to Dispensationalism? Where is the biblical link between the destruction of the temple (Matt 24) and 70 AD? There is none, Jim.
Zechariah was raised up as a prophet at the end of the Babylonian captivity to get the Jews to resume work on the foundation of the temple. Yet you cling to an interpretation which lops off the last three chapters and sets a 2,500 year and counting gap between them and the balance of the prophecy? This is not scholarship, Jim. It's lunacy ranking right up there with the same 2,500 year gap between the 69th and 70th week.
Btw, the BRANCH who built the temple of the Lord (Zech 6:12).... is this the same temple destroyed again in 70AD of which Zerubbabel laid the foundation? Is this the same BRANCH (and the same timeline of fulfillment) as Isaiah 11 to whom the Gentiles would seek (Is 11:10) which Paul cited as fulfilled during the time of his letter to the Romans (Rom 15:12)?
Hmmm. . . wrote: Hmmm . . . To ALL FREE PRESBYTERIANS & OTHER PROTESTANT CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS: HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED WHY ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIESTS, NUNS & ROMAN CATHOLICS IN GENERAL ARE NOT SLAUGHTERED -OR- EVEN TOUCHED BY ***ISIS*** ? ? ?
Hmmm. . . wrote: HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED WHY ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIESTS, NUNS & ROMAN CATHOLICS IN GENERAL ARE NOT SLAUGHTERED -OR- EVEN TOUCHED BY ***ISIS*** ? ? ?
What insane dream world are you living in to insanely believe that Catholic priests, nuns and Catholics in general are not slaughtered or even touched by ISIS? The Koran commands all Muslims to kill the infidels who according to the Koran are all Non Muslims. So since Catholics are Non Muslims then they are among those that ISIS has slautered.
Guy is an idiot, NOTHING will stop the frothing rage of Muslims, they have been frothing with blood lust for over 1000+ years, this guy is so beyond stupid it is unbelievable. You will NEVER win a war against Muslims since they hold to the concepts of suicide and child shields, the ONLY thing you can do to a Muslim is shut out your countries from their immigration, visitation and NEVER buying their oil, since none of these 3 things will EVER happen, absolutely NOTHING will change related to the Muslim threats until Jesus returns, and I believe that they will certainly be the cause of Babylon USA falling, a nuke setoff by muslims in NYC or somewhere on the coast where "her smoke can be seen from afar off".