Jim You should have read the previous post on this thread it is especially for you. Quote; "We keep advising you to get some honest and intelligent theologians for you edification. "Daniel B. Wallace has written an essay he titled "Why I Do Not Think the King James Bible Is the Best Translation Available Today." Dr. Wallace is the senior editor of the NET Bible, an also-ran modern English Bible version, so it's interesting to see how he defines his dismissal of the KJV. Interesting, because his essay brings forth quite a few false charges against the underlying text of the King James Bible, the Textus Receptus. The same old allegations are trotted out as if they haven't already been answered before. "Why you shouldn't care what Daniel Wallace thinks about the King James Bible" http://av1611.com/kjbp/articles/staggs-wallace.html
"Wallace pulls out the old "six verses in Revelation" standby: "In the last six verses of Revelation, Erasmus had no Greek manuscript." Wallace is lying anyway. The text and variants in question are not only found in various Greek manuscripts today, they were available in Erasmus' time. It is Wallace's assumption that Erasmus did not have access to these texts."