Jim Lincoln wrote:
unicorn

"Psalm 92:10 in the Latin text:

“Et exaltabitur sicut unicornis cornu meum,

et senectus mea in misericordia uberi.”

“Unicornis” is the same Latin word that is being used in the scientific name of the Asian One-Horned Rhinoceros.

If you look up Job 39:9 in the Latin Bible, the word that is being used here is the word “rinoceros”:

Job 39:9 in the Latin text:

numquid volet rinoceros servire tibi,

aut morabitur ad praesepe tuum

So, one verse says “rinoceros” and the other says “unicornis.”"

"As a matter of fact, out of the 9 scripture verses that mention unicorns, there are 5 different Latin words that are being used:

Rinoceros

Rinocerotis

Rinocerota

Unicornium

Unicornis

These five Latin words are used when the Old King James version of the Bible mentions unicorns."

Jim Lincoln wrote:
people have noticed the defects in the AV for centuries, as another of your favorites pointed out, Dr. Wallace

"Daniel B. Wallace has written an essay he titled "Why I Do Not Think the King James Bible Is the Best Translation Available Today." Dr. Wallace is the senior editor of the NET Bible, an also-ran modern English Bible version, so it's interesting to see how he defines his dismissal of the KJV. Interesting, because his essay brings forth quite a few false charges against the underlying text of the King James Bible, the Textus Receptus. The same old allegations are trotted out as if they haven't already been answered before."[URL=http://av1611.com/kjbp/articles/staggs-wallace.html]]]Why you shouldn't care what Wallace thinks about KJV[/URL]