You call the (A)nglican (V)ersion

"Tommy Rot": Utter foolishness; nonsense,

Hort to Metzger (Critical Text Proponents) agree Orthodox Christianity from the 4th to the 19th cent used the TRADITIONAL texts as the PROMINENT text. (the testimony of modern church history=Waldenses, Albigenses, Reformers etc)

The friend of Popes Tichendorf found the Sinaiticus 1844 and we know by 1881 W&H's own Greek text (inspired by the Vatican(us) library) gave us the English Revised Version. (E)ssentially (R)oman (V)atican.

In light of the comment even by a Modern version onlyist:

'it is obvious that the KJV has been the providentially appointed version of the Bible for most English-speaking people since 1611' (R C Newman)

and Guinness: 'an excellent translation'

Did the 4th to 19th cent Christians have the pure word of God or were they too using "Tommy Rot"