|
|
USER COMMENTS BY THUMBSUP |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 14 user comments posted recently. |
|
|
8/25/09 10:05 AM |
Thumbs up | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
KJVer wrote: The issue here is not just the translation. If it were merely to update archaic English, then the matter can be resolved very easily. The issue against the "multi-versionists only" is the underlying texts. They will go to any lengths to discredit the Byzantine text family of which the TR is part. So what it boils down to is whether you believe that God has preserved the original text in the "Ecclesiastical Text" which formed the basis of the KJV and all previous translations, or whether you believe the current notion of preservation viz. that this is in the total number of manuscripts available and that the exact text preserved can only be deciphered by the "scholars"! Michael H - you should remember that both Codex Vaticanus and Sinaiticus were in the hands of the RCC!! These are the 2 most problematic texts because they differ so widely from the rest, and yet these are the codices upon which the majority of modern versions are based!! Well reasoned and thoughtfully delineated post. |
|
|
3/31/09 11:07 AM |
Thumbsup | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Arah'How is a person expected to know whether a Christian is "True" or "False" if they all spout the same hatred and intolerance?' This sounds like a typical response from a homosexual when challenged with scripture BECAUSE the Bible exposes his sin as an abomination. Now interestingly I know several former homosexuals and a lesbian who had that exact opinion-chrstians are intolerant hypocrites filled with hatred-yet it was the very same christians who loved them enough to witness the gospel. Now that they no longer practise their chosen abomination they are the ones who the pink community can no longer tolerate and hate with venom! They have simply become enemies because they tell the truth and yes they evidence changed lives, but not perfection. Read I John 1: 5-10. Those born again (John 3) still sin, but notice they belong to the red community-the BLOOD OF JESUS CHRIST 'cleanseth' present tense. Without God's Spirit you can not see spiritual truth-hence to you Jesus is not God the Son. Without Christ's blood you are a lost soul sunk in sin. You are correct read Matthew 7: 16-22 and 23: 13-33 and Matth 7: 1-6 I guess you did the good person test [URL=http://www.livingwaters.com/good/]]]Arah the only one to pass![/URL] |
|
|
3/29/09 5:45 PM |
Thumbsup | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Arah Here is a most important question: What think you of Christ? It pointless you giving examples of folk who we do not know and who cannot defend themselves. All who are TRUE Christians do know the the Lord Jesus Christ and most are readily set for the defence of the gospel, yet I don't believe you really need our input. The problem is that most athiests claim to have a knowledge of the bible but few have studied the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ-many just simply google the well worn and refuted athiest arguments-yet the answers to any honest questions are readily available Can I kindly suggest you go and intently study first the person and work of Christ in the gospels with the aim of honestly answering the question: 'What think you of Christ?' Then I am sure you will have some very profound and interesting personal observations in reaching an honest conclusion, God be pleased to bless such an honest study Who is the Lord Jesus Christ? see [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=32909145424]]]answer[/URL] |
|
|
3/29/09 4:07 PM |
Thumbsup | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
JohnukI agree with your 'Ring a bell?' comments, sad as it is Two churches in Swansea area with the same minister-might be of interest if you ever drive that way................ Minister in charge: Rev Dynes Uprichard Pisgah FPC (Loughor, Swansea) Free Presbyterian Church Extension Telephone 01792 229399 Email: [email protected] Minister in charge: Rev Dynes Uprichard Emmanual Free Presbyterian Church Emmanuel, Bryn Rhos, Bryn, Llanelli, S.Wales Telephone 01792 229399. Email: [email protected] Great sermon you mentioned-God bless your witness and ever guide you continually. 1 Peter 4:14 If ye be reproached for the name of Christ, happy are ye; for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you: on their part he is evil spoken of, but on your part he is glorified. [URL=http://rlv.zcache.com/thumbs_up_smiley_face_button-p145429383060491158t5sj_400.jpg]]]smile[/URL] |
|
|
3/22/09 7:21 AM |
Thumbsup | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
'J Gresham Machen, when asked why he did not call himself a fundamentalist, though he was a hero to many fundamentalists, responded to the effect that fundamentalism was too small a ledge to stand upon as the waves of modernity swept over the shores of America. He stood for full-blooded, confessional Protestantism of the Westminster type'To quote above John's GOOD READ. Looking at the Pastors/Ministers on the TBS Commitee you'll find those Westminister types above and also Reformed Baptists. These Reformed Baptists are also full blooded PROTESTANTS. Interestingly in the UK these are the ministries God uses/is using Maybe there is something to note here? The throwing off of PROTESTANT distinctives? The last uk revival would be Ian Paisley and the FPC of Ulster...interestingly returning to PROTESTANT DISTINTIVES including 'evangelising the lost' and God blessed such Any thoughts? |
|
|
1/22/09 8:01 AM |
Thumbs Up | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
pew view wrote: .....This whole discussion commenced with John delivering the heresy that Justification needs to be supported by human works.......PV Can you point me to where John UK said that "justification needs to supported by human works.." and if he did say that (something that seems vague to me) what do you understand by it? Incidentally would you care to argue with James when he wrote: "Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?" Jas 2.21 "Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only." Jas 2.24 "Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way" Jas 2.25 Or do you suppose that he was also talking (even though he was under inspiration of the Holy Spirit) a load of codswallop! said SC PV AS far as I read John UK his understanding of doctrine seems to be similar to Spurgeon-this I noticed after his posts some weeks ago. Maybe if you reread all his posts and those of SC you might see what others seem to see |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|