|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ STEAMROLLER ” |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
| · Page 1 · Found: 41 user comments posted recently. |
|  |
|
|
 12/19/10 4:18 PM |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
 A quarter of a century ago, I got sucked into something that was purported to me to be
"the new Christianity". It was called "The New Age Movement." I was sucked in partly because this new Christianity allowed me to indulge my own sin nature and partly because I was too biblically illiterate to know what real Christianity is. Actually reading the Bible cured this. Unfortunately like this article says, fewer and fewer professing Christians want to do this, thus the church is now as post modernly "New Age" as my New age friends were back 25 years ago. They don't read the Bible and when they do they interpret it out of context and read into it what they think so as to be relevant to their precious little world; their reality. Thus as in Philipians2:21, all seeks their own, not the things which are of Christ Jesus (as he reveals Himself in His word, the Bible). |
|
|
 11/7/10 7:58 PM |
|
• Add new comment
|
“ Great Sermon! ”
Is the government's and societies' acceptance of this perversion slowing the frequency of gay suicide or has it not had any effect at all? Surely the fact that those poor sodomites can marry one another has helped in recent years hasn't it? |
|
|
| 8/15/10 3:52 PM |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
The US constitution defends “God given” inalienable rights. The right for homosexuals to raise children is not God given. If it were, artificial means of getting children by homosexuals would not be needed. As it is, only heterosexual couples can conceive children naturally. In fact, the getting of children is a natural bi-product of heterosexual marriage unless artificial means are used to stop it. So if it is natural for a child to have both a mother and a father, how can an unnatural family not cause harm to children? Something doesn't seem right here and it doesn't take a law degree to figure that out. Come on your honour, give your head a shake! |
|
|
| 7/4/10 4:42 PM |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
To Love is to tell the truth such as to bennefit the beloved. The opposite of love is not hate, but apathy. It is the very thing needed by a person who knows the truth in order for them to allow another person to continue down the broad road to destruction. Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth and the life: no man cometh unto the Father but by me." John 14:6 God commendeth His love towards us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Romans 5:8 |
|
|
| 5/30/10 4:40 PM |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
I wish Saddleback Church was spreading the true gospel; that comes from the revelation of God through His Word the Bible. I wish it was not compromising that true gospel and tolerating the error and apostasy of the Muslims etc. but spreading the saving message of the whole gospel of Christ. But I have read the writings of Rick Warren and I seriously doubt this is so. For instance, Warren says music is neutral and has no meaning of it's own but it is only the lyric that gives music meaning. But David played the harp with his hand (no mention of singing) and the evil spirit left Saul (1 Sam16:23), and before Joshua was able to understand the words of the Israelites in Exodus 32:17 , he said their songs were the sound of war. If Rick Warren is right that music is neutral, then Hollywood is wasting it's money employing composers and the program music of Beethoven, Berlioz, Wagner, and Lizst was a joke. By the way Rick, for the benefit of musical illiterates like yourself, program music is "instrumental music that tells a story. (Walt Disney's Fantasia)." So if Warren believes he can convert the depraved and unregenerate to a holy gospel by the soundtrack of sensuality, rebellion, and pride of Rock music, I cannot agree or support him! Nor if He preaches just a half truth never mind |
|
|
| 5/16/10 5:18 PM |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Doesn't freedom of speech cover freedom to tell the truth? There is no question that the Bible condemns the practice of homosexuality and damns those unrepentant practice it.Should a loving person who knows that people who continue on this practice will suffer the torments of a host of diseases in this life and hell fire in the next, not warn them of their folly? Should a loving person not try to turn them from their destruction? Should the watchman NOT WARN HIS CITY OF IMPENDING ATTACK? How guilty is the crowd who encourages a suicidal jumper by crying, "jump, jump, you have the right to do with your own body what you will!?" What a loving thing to tell such a one on the brink of destruction! But such seems the immoral majority these days. |
|
|
|
| Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
