Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream

My Favorite Things
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Church Finder
Live Webcasts
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -0 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only

Sermon ROM # 39 O Wretched man that I am, Rom 7: 21-25 | James Guyo
Joseph arthur from Greenville ohio
"Do yourself a favor, and listen to this sermon. Either in 1 2 or 3..."
-20 hrs 
Sermon More Than Enough Hope | Dr. Jim Berg
Destinie Marie
-29 hrs  24 
Sermon "A message made effectual" | Aaron Greenleaf
Anthony from Altamonte Springs FL
-37 hrs 
· Page 1 ·  Found: 170 user comments posted recently.
Sermon2/28/11 1:08 AM
Nathan | Raliegh, NC  Protected NameFind all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
Are You A True Worshipper
Scott Hill
“ Wow! ”
I hope you don't mind, but I'm going borrow this and preach this sermon to my church.

Sermon1/10/11 5:10 PM
Nathan | US  Contact via emailFind all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
The Husband of One Wife
Richard Caldwell Jr.
“ Just What I Needed to Hear ”
I went to a club with a friend of mine the night before and noticed that my thoughts were not pure. While having impure thoughts is never good for one's soul, it feels even worse when your girlfriend is in Chile and you don't know when you'll get to see her again. This sermon really helped me maintain my faithfulness, not physically because that's not a problem, but mentally and spiritually.

News Item5/18/10 2:43 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
1. Who would borrow at 400%, no matter what. We are not told what "christian" actually means here though.
2. This goes to show that christians should not get involved with ursury.
3. This Mustafa is a Islamic Hypocrite. Islam being partly gleaned from Judaism, also does not believe in practicing ursury (though how Islam considers lending to us Dhimmi may allow for such behaviour?) If someone knows please let me know.

What saddens me the most is that he lost a kidney over a miserly $1500.
I could have paid his debt.

It is this last point that makes me take a hard look at myself.

News Item10/18/09 8:24 PM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
Savedbygrace said

"Possibly, Rome has a shrine somewhere with a bottle of Jesus real blood,"

If you watch Mel Gibsons "The Passion" you see Mary wiping up Jesus' blood from the ground after he was whipped.

Of course Rome would think like this, but this is what others have said about John Macarthur's comments, excusing him.

He should have made this point as it would have put it in context but he has avoided it either to not offend Roman Catholics or he truely holds this blasphemous view that he espouses.

Frankly the liquid (aka at the time of it's shedding once and for all) because no other could shed their blood.
Jesus was from the blood line of David, this is significant, the messiah had to have the royal blood of the house of David running through him.
This is actual and this is not mystical.
The blood of Jesus is not mystical, but it is legal.
John Macarthur does not acknowledge this fact, and as educated as he is, it should be clear to state it as such.

News Item10/18/09 7:40 PM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
Dr Macarthur equates the blood as a metaphor for death.
He says this himself.

So then is blood significant or not.

His blood was significant and since John Macarthur is a theologian he should be able to explain this in his statements but has not leaving his statements clear and obviously from another source of revelation other than the Bible.

The blood (the actual liquid) is significant because firstly you cannot shed non actual liquid blood.(This becomes a word game)
Secondly the blood has power because it is authoritative, this is a legal matter and produces a legal result (remission of sins).
If Jesus was a non blooded being and yet was without sin and died for us we would not be saved because "without the shedding of blood there is no remission.."
Why because life is in the blood.

We are baptised into his blood, we are ALSO baptised into his death and will also take part in his ressurrection.
Notice how these are 3 seperate things, blood and death and not synonomous.

News Item10/18/09 6:42 PM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
To have a good comparision of Dr Macarthur with the cults see


What Dr Hymers rings true to me because firstly Eddy(Christian Science), Russell(JW's) and Smith (Mormons) were best friends and were high level Freemasons.

We are told also by Alice Bailey of the Theosophical society that the new World Order would come about through the church. That they would put ther people in our churches and steer us in the way they wanted to go.

And so the church today is already walking in these ways and no one says boo, and no one challenges the leaders (don't touch the Lords annointed). We're all so scared of our "priests" I know were not Protestants any longer.

What has happened in western culture and equally in the church is what is termed an 'unpercieved ideological transshipment'.

This is what the numerous bible translations are all about too.

News Item10/18/09 7:42 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
I am sorry to report that my investigation so far on this matter places my opinion right back where I started from.

I do understand this has gone way off topic. (Maybe not since that church would burn his books too)

I have come across audio of Dr Macarthur defending against the accusations regarding the blood of Christ.

He is merely shadow boxing. He is a politician in my books dancing around the issue.
He then ( and this supposed to be him defending himself) states

"Having said that, you must stop short of saying that we are saved by the blood of Jesus."

[search youtube John MacArthur Defends him self on the blood of Christ]

Cleverly he tries to confuse the issue (just like in his books) as usual talking about its molecules "the liquid" itself.
This is classic double talk and is no retraction or correction.

It goes to show, any "christian" who looks to any man is a fool.
Look to Christ for all men are liars.
Especially those in position of power.

News Item10/18/09 3:43 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
hidemi williges:
If he has retracted it that would be a great thing.

What I am referring to is that he said in his book Grace to You pg 10

"It was His death that was efficacious not His blood"

What is interesting about this is this is almost the same as a quote by Mary Baker Eddy of Christian Science (which it is not) saying

"The material blood of Jesus was no more efficacious to cleanse from sin when it was shed upon 'the accursed tree' than when it was flowing in his veins"

This is a terrible statement and I wonder who Dr Macarthur has been gleening his theology from?
At least in the past.
Like I said I wish to checkout his retraction to see exactly what it entails.
Sometimes retractions are merely damage control and spin doctoring.

Scripture says the life is in the blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins.

News Item10/17/09 6:05 PM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
Hi Michael

What you say is true. Just because somebody does something or says something does not make it true.

What it does do though is that is adds impetus to the weight of the arguement considering this man was involved in the translation.

It is funny that people ask for proof about something (like Jim) and yet it will probably taken out of contention as useful information from what you have said.

It becomes a circumlocatious arguement to say we are to judge everything by scripture and yet not know what scripture is!

Outside evidence and information then becomes required which makes Dr Logsdon's testimony important.

BTW you do know John MacArthur denies that the blood of Jesus saves.

Survey10/17/09 5:43 PM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
It is good to see such a huge response in the negative here.

We have had our flu season here in Australia and I was watching US news hour yesterday.
I was first struck dumb by how many NWO sponsors PBS has and noticed that most of those who they interview are also in the same category.

Then a news item which had me most amused was on H1N1, and how "more children have died from H1N1 already this season than from the normal flu the whole of last season"

Well they have learnt from our arguements from our season, that was exactly the problem with causing a panic here.
There just wasn't enough deaths.

It would be good with someone with access to check the stats.
It is not difficult to reclassify other types of death and attribute it with H1N1, cause once it is in the media as fact even with an investigation, it will be almost impossible to get "the facts" out of peoples minds.

This reclassification occurs all the time with death from vaccination, and it is posible these deaths may have been from the H1N1 vaccination.

News Item10/17/09 5:28 PM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Thread closed
• Report abuse

I can refer you to actual audio of Dr Frank Logsdon in a message by Dr Frank Logsdon on this site by the way.

I'm not sure you can do better than get it from the horses mouth.
Unless you wish to start saying you need to perform voice recognition on the audio, etc etc.

News Item10/14/09 2:24 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
Willa wrote:
About 90% of 3146 scientists surveyed believe in global warming, and 82% of these 3146 believe it's man made.
Among climatologists, this percentage is 97.
These statistics are misleading.
I believe it is man made aka not by me using a washing machine or others driving a car.
It is literally man made.
It is the desire of the world leaders to have another panic button on their dash board of population control techniques, like terrorism ( as this one seems a little thin unlike the iron curtain which achieved it's aims).
Socialist politics is green.
I am all for being responsible but this is all leading to Thomas Aquinas' ide of rights, responsibilities, needs and the like.
This of course will then create by default Roman Catholic Theology on law and order, punishment and persecution but through a cicil authority without having to make it clear that it is in the name of God.

News Item9/27/09 7:12 PM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
Mike wrote:
"One song that the children were taught quotes directly from the spiritual "Jesus Loves the Little Children," though Jesus' name is replaced with Obama's: "He said red, yellow, black or white/All are equal in his sight. Barack Hussein Obama."
Excellent observation, I noticed that. It adds to his messiah complex.

Tony cool it with the term "fool" since scripture says to call no man fool.
These guys aren't disagreeing with you on doctrine, but on an ENIGMA, the falsely named Obama.
Disagreeing with an opinion is one thing, slurs are quite another.

I would like to see some evidence rather than just flat out opinions.
Obama is still in the land of theory. The whole story is not at hand yet.

Obama is not the Anti Christ.
He is artificially being made to fulfill some aspects but not all.
He has to come from among us "the church" (like the pope, Obama may be seen as doing that) up root 3 horns (the Pope did) have names of blasphemy (like the Pope does) Obama only assume a blaphemous musings, not titles.
comes in a name that is not his own (the pope does that, and it appears so does Obama) but he is not antichrist, the Pope is. Lacking one aspect of antichrist then he is not antichrist.

News Item9/25/09 10:29 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
This thing is bigger than being muslim or not christian.
Your not asking the right questions.

Obama's ex pastor for the UCC gave Larry Farrakan an award (you know of nation of islam).

Obama's wife has connections with Farrakan's wife.

Farrakan, Schuller and Billy Graham all attended the same masonic lodge.

All have had sanction by the Pope.

Schuller trained Rick Warren who had Obama at his church.

This is just in your neck of the woods, it's going on everywhere

Labels and titles are illusions. We are talking about the erection of the final peices of mystery of iniquity that has been working through the Roman Catholic Church for 1500 years and everything it touches.

These guys don't think in terms like we do. These guys are occultists (more than just the hidden defnition).

These are the ones spoken of by Alice Bailey, Blavatsky, and numerous warnings through the ages by godly men and women.

These men have gazed into the void of the darkness (those who understand know what I speak of) and it has driven them mad.

News Item9/25/09 4:36 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse

(Firstly I like you name. Spot on, no disagreement there)

Bouffard, I have video of him speaking with Nury Rivera. He also had the gold pen on him.
He shows the ring of a Bishop which was broken.

He also has other evidence he says but he has this in hiding.

This is for good reason I believe, because once all the info is available it will be destroyed along with Bouffard.
Equally, it might just be the one thing he has over them that keep him alive.

No Protestant Reformed RC believe's Rivera's credible and that is their perogative. Even Richard Bennett. Rivera's an extreme case and they may be finding it more conducive for evangelism to reach Catholics in a less confronting manner.
That is the way they minister.

As for him seeing priests levitating, it would not surprise me. I have seen some pretty demonic things myself, as have other people with me, all dealt with in the name of Jesus.

I have numerous examples I could give.

His story is to me, not far fetched.

What's wrong with Seasame St and the Muppets, don't dis my childhood up bringing. lol

News Item9/25/09 4:20 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
I see it more like

"Hey Mr President go to church" and get the christians argueing amongst themselves whether you are genuine or not.
Like Emperor Constantine.

News Item9/25/09 4:15 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
Can I please ad on the mention of Muammar Gadhafi.
It came out in the Lockerby Bombing case when the two Lybian agents were extradited to Scotland for the trial that one of the on the stand admitted that Muammar Gadhafi was a Muslim Mason.

The leaders of the world play the part they are required to play and say the things they have to say.

Just thought that might add more light on the discussion.

News Item9/24/09 8:24 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
Thanks for you comments Tony.
Yes, I believe by what Dr Rivera said that he could have only been exactly what he claimed, regardless of certain "inconsistencies".
If you asked me to give my testimony I would assure you it would not be exactly the same every time. Especially when quoting dates from times in your life you'd rather forget, in many ways have forgotten through past stress, the memory blacks some things out.

He either is the most incredible researcher or he was a Jesuit. I believe he was the latter.

Malchi Martin has validated what he has spoken about, new inforation has been forth coming since his death and keep prooving he was the genuine article.

Survey9/24/09 8:10 AM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse

I am wondering if you are reconsidering your position regarding the chair of St Peter being ONLY the office of Pope.

Clearly there are literal "chairs" as I have shown, but you have ignored my submission.
What are your thoughts on this matter?

Survey9/23/09 5:05 PM
Nathan | Australia  Find all comments by Nathan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse

The chair is literal as well as metaphorical.

Hac cathedra, Petrus qua sederat ipse, locatum Maxima Roma Linum primum considere iussit.
- "Adversus Marcionem" (Patrologia Latina II, 1099)

The Latin translates:

"On this chair whereupon Peter himself sat The great Rome placed Linus and commanded him to sit."

Tertullian and others say that a true chair exsisted.
(On Baptism, 4). "... various churches in which the actual chairs of the Apostles are still standing in their places, in which their own authentic letters are read..." (Prescriptions Against Heretics, 32, 36, by Tertullian).

Early Roman martyrologies record January 18: "The chair of St. Peter on which he first sat at Rome."

St Peter's chair's establishment celebrated on February 22.
The second "Chair of Peter" was encased in bronze by Bernini.

There have also been other chairs.
See the Catholic Encyclopedia 03551e.htm

One was marble, one was wood which was a movable cathedra.
Pope Gregory the Great had another one commissioned etc etc.

History attests to the fact that it is a well known problem there are a number of historical chairs upon which it is said to be the said "seat of St Peter".

Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Ken Wimer
The Gospel of Free Salvation

Fellowship in Christ
Shreveport Grace Church
Play! | MP4 | RSS

The Law
Sean E. Harris

First Love

E. A. Johnston
Sam Jones: A New Biography

Revival Institutes
Evangelism Awakening
Video!Play! | MP4

Mark S. Wisniewski
Dichosos Los Ojos

Lucas - Spanish 2023
Iglesia Nueva Obra en...
Play! | MP3

Free Preaching Course: 60 Videos

New from New Church­es. Less­ons taught by John Piper, Bryan Chap­ell, & more.

The Life & Ministry of Dr. Tony Evans

New podc­ast with feat­ured guests Kirk Frankl­in, Tony Dungy, Prisc­illa Shir­er, & more.

Sermon: Looking to Jehovah for Help
Rev. Nate Decker

SPONSOR | 3,600+


SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up

Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader

Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos

Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Stats
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Webcast | Multicast
Solo Sites
Listen Line
Events | Notices
QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
Embed Codes
Logos | e-Sword | BLB

Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Privacy Policy

First Love
Copyright © 2023 SermonAudio.