This is right in line with what they believe... I use this all the time witnessing to Roman Catholics. I ask them what does paragraph 841 in the Catholic catechism say about Muslims. Check it out for yourself. It says that they are included in the plan of salvation.
Semper Fi, and Praise the Lord, even if this case didn't turn out the way it did we should still Paraise the Lord because he is Mighty and sits upon the throne.
So Mr. Lincoln because this was posted in Charisma Magazine its therefore invalid. Then the acticle was picked up by another Mormon on www.the blaze.com So if someone quoted a post from you in charisma you would no longer be the mouthpiece for Christiandom that you think you are.
Dave Bellwoar wrote: Just a little food for thought: If it's allright for a woman to wear pants - why should a man not wear a skirt? If your answer is that there are pants designed for a woman, would it be O-K to have a skirt designed for a man? If it is O-K for women to attend church without a headcovering because I Cor.11 was a "customary" rule of the times, is it O-K for a man to wear a headcovering in the worship service? My point being: Why are Christians, and non-Christians alike, more able to accept women taking on manly customs of dress, but we get all creepy when men take on womanly customs of dress? Is such "crossdressing" a step up for women but a step down for men? If so, is it because of misogyny?
You seem to have similar views of a good fundamental church in your neighborhood, if you don't have a church family. I would recommend Bible Baptist in West Chester.
Pastor Mike wrote: This is appropriate, because the only people who still believe that old outdated book ARE pinheads!
Can you elaborate on your comment, are you saying that anyone that believes the Old Testament is a pinhead...I take that as a derogatory remark. Or were you trying to be sarcastic?
4/9/16 12:57 PM
