Rodney K. wrote:
Hear all ye who doth post on the SA forum, even ye which do post by computer, yea even ye which do post by tablet or by phone. Behold how that Jim doth not understand that which hath been written in old English. Yea, even that English which doth use words as "thee," "thou," "thy," and "thine." Therefore, if thou shouldst desire to write that which may not be understood by him, do so as I have done unto thee: even write thou in old English. For it shalt be that when thou shouldst do so; lo, he shalt be confounded. Yea he shalt be confounded from rising of the sun until the going down of the same, so that it wilt not be knownst to him what thou shalt write, neither shalt he know the meaning thereof. And lo, if thou shalt hear my words which I write this day, and if thou, even thine own self, shalt write in the manner thereof, he wilt be as one who graspeth at the wind; even as one who voteth for liberal politicians. And he shalt post links. Yea and his links shalt be many and they shalt be repetitive. And ye shalt know in that day, even that selfsame day, that a great confusion has been wrought amoungst thine boards; when thy words which thou shalt write do cause him to be confounded.

B. McCausland wrote:
Please, may we know the source?

Dave wrote:
There is no scripture ..changing the Sabbath, from the 7th to 1st day.
So I would be grateful if you could show me otherwise

B. McCausland wrote:
Sorry, friend, you are in a different track of thought all together.
Though what you state is true, this is not what it was being conveyed, discussed or talked about, neither was the heart of the matter in question. Sorry to say you are in a different trail of thought.
Please, you are welcome to explain the connection you make with the topic discussed.
No intent to offend, just being honest in case you have misread the thread's direction.
Take care

B. McCausland wrote:
Please, it will be good to read valid church history.
There was a measure of political factor, but the Reformation thrived on the wings of a biblical belief system. ...

The reformers, like the Romanism from which they emerged, viewed the church and state as one, and that is why every individual born was baptized into the church and seen as part of it.

Mike wrote:
Didn't work very well, looks like.

Sabbath wrote:
Because God had chosen to 'rest' after six days of creation - HE then *blessed* and *sanctified* A DAY - BECAUSE He had rested from creating. The day commemorates GOD's rest.

Mike wrote:
The Puritan Separatists came out of the C of E for a reason. And they brought the Geneva with them to our shores. But I haven't been able to find info that Reynolds came out. Perhaps he was a PINO?

Brit wrote:
Slightly off topic;
When you use the term "Feds" as in this article, do you mean government officials?
I thought it had meant FBI?

1517 wrote:
-- selective interpretation which is contemporary and doesn't reflect proper Church teaching.---

clarification wrote:
Lev 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Whereas Normal people...
Matt 19:8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery

John for Jesus wrote:
Whenever someone gets divorced and then marries someone else, they have commited adultery.

Homosexuality is entirely different than adultery. You just repent of adultery, but stay married to your 2nd, 3rd, 4th, or 5th wife and you'll get to heaven.

But if you're married to your first same-sex spouse, you can't repent of homosexuality, stay married and still get to heaven. You have to break up even if you love the Lord, are 100% pro-life and have four or five children with your gay spouse.