Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
( praying now )

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -0 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only - Legacy

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ ICON O'CLAST ”
Page 1 | Page 7 ·  Found: 202 user comments posted recently.
Survey4/3/08 9:08 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
1457
comments
The Sovereign God has a purpose for His Word when He sends it out through the agency of man's preaching and evangelism. He not only knows His purpose, He has determined this purpose. This purpose is the reason why the word is sent out. So if through your evangelising you gain 3000 converts (Peter) then God's purpose which He purposed from all eternity is fulfilled. But if through your evangelising you gain 3000 stones (Stephen) God's purpose is likewise fulfilled. My point is that God's Word has an eternal purpose and this purpose will always be fulfilled - either in conversion through faith and repentance (Peter) or in condemnation through wilfull rejection of God and His Christ (Stephen). JD and others would have God's word only being sent out to save, so there is a large percent of failure. But God says His word never fails, it always accomplishes His purpose. Our task is not to discern the purpose, but to preach indiscriminately and leave the fulfilling of the purpose to Almighty God. We Plant, we water but the increase is of God. We preach, we exhort, we command to repent but it is God who prepares the heart. Man cannot prepare his own heart. So the sower sows but the soil's condition is from God and of God to whom be all glory and praise for ever and ever amen.

Survey4/3/08 7:29 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
1457
comments
JD et al; If you are correct and Jesus came to save every man without distinction then He failed miserably. If He paid the penalty for every man then He only received a small portion of what He paid for and was seriously shortchanged. Then God was lying when He said that His word would not return to Him void but would fulfill the purpose for which He sent it - for in your way of thinking the purpose is only to save and that purpose is not always fulfilled. I say again, you err because you do not understand the seriousness, effect and extent of sin, you do not understand the Soveriegnty of Almighty God who does as He pleases in all things. You choose a handfull of texts which talk about Christ saving the world or all men, which can only mean all without distinction, ie, from out of the whole world. Yet you ignore the many texts which are specific and speak of Christ coming to save HIS people, HIS sheep etc. God, who decrees all that comes to pass, has also decreed that Christ would save a distinct body of people. We know that God works all things for good for those who love Him precisely for this reason - and the text goes on to answer that. The Arminian gospel with its easy-believism based on human decision has done much harm to the true gospel of Christ.

Survey3/31/08 3:43 AM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
1457
comments
JD wrote:
We must witness if we want to see those He died for become His sheep.
______
So goats become sheep, then if they lose their salvation they become goats again? Tares become wheat, darkness turns itself into light and the dead in sin rise from the dead by making a decision. Where have I heard all this bullsquash before? That's right - same place same people.

News Item3/17/08 11:39 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
29
comments
And yet there are so many who cannot see that the Papacy is the Antichrist and the Pope is that man of sin. Did not the Spirit expressly say that in the latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons (Mariolatry, prayer to saints, purgatory etc), speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their conscience seared with a hot iron, forbidding to marry (celibacy) and commanding to abstain from foods (Lent etc). How people can read their Bibles with their eyes so closed to the truth is amazing. The man of sin, who exalts himself above all that is called God (holy father/great highpriest/vicar of Christ), or that is worshipped (Catholics worship the Pope)sits as God in the temple of God (in the church). He is the very opposite of Christ, a veritable anti Christ, yet even evangelicals like that apostate Billy Graham have bowed the knee to him and kissed his hand. When will we wake up?!?

Survey3/17/08 7:25 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
5819
comments
Oh, I see - so I can be misrepresented and have my words twisted, but if I show my displeasure my post is removed. Well, I will try again.
Mike and DB - I do not appreciate being deliberately misrepresented (hope that wasn't too strongly phrased). If you are a 4 point Arminian, then you are an Arminian. If you do not like the terminology, terribly sorry. Hope I did not offend you.

Survey3/17/08 6:25 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
5819
comments
[Removed by Moderator Alpha]

Survey3/17/08 6:20 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
2798
comments
KK - you never responded to my post, but now say that Esau made a choice and his eternal destiny was sealed when he sold his birthright?
So when God said, "The elder shall serve the younger" He was acting out of foreseeing what Esau would do? Or did Esau do what was in his sinful nature anyway. Both Malachi and Romans clearly explain that this was God's choice and God's prerogative - not Esau's. He had as much say in things as Pharaoh did. Both these God left in their own evil stew. But why did God hate Esau? Because God hates sin - absolutely hates, loathes and despises it. Did God see something different in Jacob then, a possibility, a foreknowledge of some good? Absolutely not. God knew that He would have to choose someone to take out of the evil stew - and for reasons we will never fathom, He chose Jacob. If it had been me doing the chosing I would have picked Esau. Jacob was a mongrel in my book. But God is not like us - and He does not choose the way we would or for the reasons we would. But HE does the choosing - make no mistake about that. It is His choice to set His love on someone and then redeem them from out of the evil stew of lost humanity. That is grace, amazing grace. Nothing else!

Survey3/16/08 11:17 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
5819
comments
Discerning Believer wrote:
Icon O Clast,
On the same token, does one who believes only 3 or 4 points of Calvinism still a Calvinist?
Or does he have to hold all 5 points to be a Calvinist.
I have never known anyone who called him/herself a Calvinist who only believed 3 or 4 of the points. To understand this one must know how the points support each other. Total Depravity means all our faculties are bent only towards evil. If this is true then none left in this state would be saved. So God needs to choose whom He wants to save. On what basis does He choose? They are all gone astray and all hate God and none seek good. So there is no other condition than the pleasure of His will. Did Christ then die for them only or also for those God did not choose? That would mean He paid for something He did not get. But those whom God chose, can they resist the regenerating power of His Holy Spirit? No more than Lazarus could resist the command of Christ to rise and come out of the grave. Once God has regenerated those whom He unconditionally elected will they once again die spiritually and thus be lost? God forbid, those whom He elects will be glorified. Do you see how you either take all 5 points or reject all 5? To hold to OSAS is nonsensical in the extreme

Survey3/16/08 10:26 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
5819
comments
I assume OSAS means Once Saved Always Saved. So if you believe this - and the wording is totally unScriptural - you are not an Arminian? There were 5 points in the Arminian Remonstrance, but you think if you believe in the first 4 but not the last 5 then you are not an Arminian? Can you not see that each point is built upon the other - that if one stands then they all stand and if one fails then they all fail? It starts - as has been laboriously pointed out before - with the concept of sin. An Arminian thinks man is still able to choose good after the fall. The Calvinist says that man is dead in sin because of the fall and is only able to choose degrees of evil - but never good. The whole concept of being free to choose Christ or not, but then once your choice is made that freedom is gone is so fundamentally flawed. But then, so is the whole concept of Arminianism, because it begins with an unbiblical foundation of sin and its effects on mankind. Nevertheless, to say that anyone who believes OSAS is not an Arminian despite adhering to the other 4 points, is to say that someone who holds to all the tenents of Catholocism yet denies the existence of Purgatory, or Mariolatry, or the infallibility of the Pope ceases to be a Catholic. I think I have proved my point.

Survey3/16/08 8:11 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
5819
comments
I find it passing strange that 39% on this question identified themselves as Fundamentalist (whatever that may be) and only 3% identified themselves as Arminian. That either shows a lot of ignorance or a lot of dishonesty as most who call themselves Fundamentalists (whatever that may be) are patently and unashamedly Arminian in their soteriology. I tend to think (and hope) that it is ignorance rather than dishonesty. I have come to the sad conclusion that there is a vast majority who call themselves Biblical Fundamentalists who haven't a clue what Christianity is or what the Bible really teaches. In this day and age, with the wealth of information that is available to us, the freedom we have to attend Bible Studies and lectures etc, I find that inexcusable. As Christians we ought to - all of us - hang our heads in shame. We are so caught up in petty arguments. We spend so much time in useless pursuits. Yet we no longer build up the Body of Christ and most do not even catechise their children anymore. Everyone blathers on about outreach, evangelism and revival - most of which is lost in the morass of the apostate church growth movement. Methinks we are due for another Reformation.

Survey3/15/08 8:21 AM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
1235
comments
My Scottish friends would have a different view on all this, as the men wear all the skirts. I know of at least one woman in my home who wears the pants and I have to tell her every day that I love her.

Survey3/15/08 8:17 AM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
427
comments
The Church is of Israel wrote:
Recall that (1) the Old Covenant was a covenant of marriage, (2) Israel was divided in twain, and (3) the Northern Kingdom was divorced; this is the origin of the "nations" or "gentiles" (from the Latin GENTILIS, which is the exact equivalent of the Greek ETHNOS). The Southern Kingdom remained in the marriage relationship; these are the "Jews".
The prophets foretold the reunion of the SK and the NK, with both being brought into the marriage relationship of the New Covenant. The restoration of Israel is fulfilled in the Church, which is composed exclusively of the literal, physical descendants of Israel.
But in the eyes of God, not all Israelites of the flesh are part of Israel; unbelievers are excluded. Accordingly, the Church is termed the "Israel of God".
Not a lot of that makes sense mate, and some of it sounds a bit curly. The church is made up exclusively of lieteral, physical descendants of Israel? In the eyes of God the only true Israel has only ever been those who were in Christ, the remnant of election in the OT and the Church in the NT. They form one body, which is the true Israel. ALL who are of faith, both OT and NT saints, are true descendants of Abraham and heirs according to the promise.

Survey3/14/08 8:44 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
94
comments
Most of those who call themselves Jews these days are heretics and atheists. Those Jews who are Christians may be found worshipping together with Christian Arabs and Palestinians. If you can prove your Jewish descent you will be allowed into modern day Israel as a citizen. But if they know you are a Christian Jew you will be excluded. Modern day Israel has no connection whatsoever to OT Israel - they are no longer the covenant people of God because that covenant is no longer in operation. Their only hope is in the Christ of the New Covenant. Christians are the only true covenant people of God, the only true Israel, the only true Jews. You are either in Christ or you are condemned for eternity, you are either a member of the New Covenant or you are outside of the grace of God. There is no middle ground, there are no other people of God than those who are in Christ.

Survey3/14/08 5:36 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
2798
comments
Again it comes down to this idea of "choosing" and again the issue is confused. KK says "So many love darkness rather than light." It is in that statement that you find the basis for the choice. Men choose that which they love, that which appeals to them, that which they are attracted to, that which they understand and can relate to. In all of the above, God does not feature. By nature we do not love God, He does not appeal to us, we are not attracted to Him, we do not understand Him and we cannot relate to Him. The John 3 text which everyone quotes to demonstrates a love of God which is almost universal, also contains truths which many conveniently forget. Those that do not believe are condemned already! This means that ALL of mankind is condemnded for by nature no one believes. The elect are redeemed from out of a condemned race and the others are left in their state of condemnation to bear God's wrath, hatred and vengeange which they deserve. The elect are saved, not because they deserve it, but because of God's love and mercy. This is grace and if you do not understand that you have not yet begun to understand grace. If you are saved because you chose to, then grace has ceased to exist because somewhere you deserved it.

Survey3/13/08 5:52 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
92
comments
I get the distinct impression Bernard, Mr. j and Jago that the others care not a whit about worship. They like to beat themselves into a frenzy about how OT saints were saved or whether baptism is dipping or dripping, but when it comes to the worship of God they seem a bit indifferent. I suppose that pretty much sums up the attitude of the church in general.

Survey3/13/08 4:41 AM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
427
comments
Observation Post wrote:
"How Were Old Testament Saints Saved?"
Luk 10:25-28 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.
And he, not knowing that the law was not there to show how we can save ourselves, but to show how we are not able to please God said, "All these I have kept from my youth!" Then Jeuss, knowing full well that he had done no such thing but was lost in sin and misery said, "You still lack one thing" - that is, the one thing every human being lacks; a Saviour! So get rid of that which prevents you from coming to me, your position and your possessions and then follow that Saviour.
By the deeds of the law shall NO FLESH be justified.
There one God and One Mediator between God and man.
Here endeth the lesson.

Survey3/12/08 8:13 PM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
92
comments
Mr. J wrote:
If you do a proper exegesis of the two parallel texts which speak on Psalms, Hymns and Spiritual songs you come to the conclusion that they speak of Psalms, Psalms and Psalms. OT Psalms was the only hymnbook the OT church knew and one of the saddest days in the history of the Protestant church waw when the Psalms were thrown out with the bathwater.
How do you get Psalms, Psalms and Psalms from "Psalms, hymns and spiritual songs?" That doesn't make sense to me.After the Passover feast it says they sang a hymn. Also the apostles in prison were singing praise unto God. Revelations, among other places, talks about a new song. So are you saying these all mean Psalms? I don't think so mate!

Survey3/12/08 1:57 AM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
135
comments
The Lord's Church is that body of believers, elect from all eternity, bought and paid for by the work of the Lamb of God, out of every nation, tribe and tongue and out of the whole dimension of time - including all OT as well as NT saints, including all redeemed Jews as well as redeemed non-Jews, including all who died in infancy but were in the covenant of grace, and all who remained in "infancy" throughout their life because of biological or accidental damage to their intellectual faculties.

Survey3/12/08 1:49 AM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
427
comments
JD wrote:
The westminsters and the divines and many of the reform writers are your enemies and you are duped into thinking they are your friends and you are trying to cover for centuries of perverted doctrines and you have not had to deal with someone like me that requires you to prove your errors while giving you the truth at the same time.
JD, I get the same garbology from the JW's and other extra-Biblical apostasy peddlers who also think, just like you, that ALL before them were corrupt heretics. Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, Knox, Hodge, Murray, Berkhof, Hendriksen, Owen, Lee, Krabbendam - they are all idiots or deliberate Bible corrupters. Darby, now HE was a saint, and Scofield, He saved the church from the perversions of the Reformers. Sorry JD, but there hasn't been a Dispensational theologian of note since Walvoord gave up trying, and Gentry and Chilton have nailed your coffin shut. So stop making out you are some sort of orthodox hero trying to save us from the perversions of the Reformers and Puritans - because you, mate, are the one following the fruitcakes from the Scofield camp. You guys have butchered the Bible long enough and it is high time you stopped this double-visioned nonsense. It is a blight on all Christ died for.

Survey3/11/08 2:58 AM
Icon O'Clast | Oz  Find all comments by Icon O'Clast
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
427
comments
Jesus said, "Abraham saw MY day." Job could confess, "I know that MY redeemer lives and that He shall stand at last on the earth." Joshua was one in whom was the Spirit of God BEFORE he took on the office vacated by Moses. The OT is full of accounts where men had close and intimate interaction with God. Yet you would have us believe that these men were unregenerate, dead in sin, did not by nature want to know God and were not able to discern spiritual things. They were all blind, deaf and dumb, could not even see the kingdom of God but they had union and communion with a Holy God anyway. How can we be blest with believing Abraham if he was little more than an unregenerate unbeliever? Try to see the Scriptures as one covenantal book rather than a series of failed attempts by God (a la Scofield the heretic) and you might be shocked and amazed. The NT is different because it now went beyond the boundaries of national Israel - that was the mystery that was later revealed. In that sense it was a New Covenant. But the same blessings first given to Abraham applies even now to believers and their seed. To them God still says, I will be your God and you shall be my people, and I will dwell with you. Miss the significance of that and you will stay lost in your whirlpool of confusion.
Jump to Page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 more



Jeffery Hamilton
The Fiery Serpent

Numbers 21:4-9
Bible Study
The Word.
Play! | MP3 | RSS


The Day the Sun Stood Still

Mark S. Wisniewski
Medicina Fuerte Y Buena

Hebreos 2024 - Spanish
Iglesia Nueva Obra en...
Play! | MP3

Sponsor:
New Book from John MacArthur

"The War on Childr­en: Prov­id­ing Refuge for Your Children in a Host­ile World"
https://www.amazon.com/war-..

Sponsor:
MacArthur Old Testament Commentaries

New series from John Mac­Arth­ur. Jon­ah/N­ahum & Zech­ar­iah now avail­able.
https://www.amazon.com/jona..

Sponsor:
New Podcast for Pastors from NAMB

Join podc­ast host, Ken Whitten & guests Tony Dungy, H.B. Charlr­es, Jr. & more.
https://www.namb.net/podcas..

Sermon: Nail Scarred Ark Of Safety
E. A. Johnston

SPONSOR

SPONSOR



SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
TECH TALKS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Stats
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Webcast | Multicast
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Podcasting
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription
Business Cards
QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
API v2.0 New!

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

THE VAULT VLOG
The Day the Sun Stood Still
Copyright © 2024 SermonAudio.