|
Page 1 | Page 6 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
2/2/18 6:00 PM |
Kev | | US | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Dave wrote: I have an old KJV, complete with the apocrypha. So if KJV is infallible, did God get it wrong for a short while? Then realise, Hey there Dave hope all is well mate. I think that the answer might be in the name:a·poc·ry·phal əˈpäkrəfəl/Submit adjective adjective: apocryphal (of a story or statement) of doubtful authenticity, although widely circulated as being true. "an apocryphal story about a former president" synonyms: fictitious, made-up, untrue, fabricated, false, spurious; More unverified, unauthenticated, unsubstantiated; bogus "the possibly apocryphal account of the meeting between Diogenes and Alexander the Great" antonyms: authentic of or belonging to the Apocrypha. adjective: Apocryphal "the Apocryphal Gospel of Thomas" I think the title gives the work it’s proper place. — I would just ignore some but if you want to confront the person just make sure your careful of how you word it so they won’t delete it but you can still get your point across. G’day mate! |
|
|
2/2/18 2:36 PM |
Kev | | US | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Thanks Carol! — Jim by your comment you obviously don’t understand the view I have. Its not that I believe that there are some godly men out to deceive us it’s that I personally don’t trust fully what they are basing their studies on. I believe they may very well be deceived themselves and that what they are studying might not be trust worthy. The sources of some of the MATERIALS they study is of the question not all who are interpreting it! Of course everyone with a little research can see Westcott and Hort aren’t ones I would want to placement my trust in!Maybe you should look at it from another view and watch the documentaries suggested below. Especially: Tares Among the Wheat If one thing has questionable origins why not just go for the one that has trustworthy origins that godly men gave their lives to give to the people and that God has been using to build His Kingdom for hundreds of years? Trust me I use to watch things on why the NASB was “the best” bible so I have looked at it from both sides. |
|
|
2/2/18 1:13 PM |
Kev | | US | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Christopher000 wrote: Hey Kev, thanks for mentioning Amazon Prime...will take a look.How great it must be to have a wife who's a born again Christian, and to be on the same page, and with the same interests and goals. Yes it definitely is Chris! Proverbs 19:14 (KJV) 14 House and riches are the inheritance of fathers: and a prudent wife is from the Lord. God sent her into my life to lead me to Him and sent me into her life so she could actually hear and understand the Gospel(she didn’t get that in her old church setting) and I don’t believe she was born again till recently. She at first was opposed to the Gospel but now she is pretty much just like me in her understanding and has now a close relationship with God. It’s cool how God works these things out. God is teaching you things in your relationship Chris and I’m sorry to hear your wife is not interested in the things of the Lord. My wife traded in her old NLT for the KJV after doing study and looking into these things as well, she is a firm believer in the KJV. Yeah they are very well done documentaries, being on Amazon shows the quality and are things every Christian should research for themselves. Being on Amazon Prime for free makes it easy to watch with a smart tv. |
|
|
2/2/18 11:48 AM |
Kev | | US | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Thanks there Lurker. Like you said these things should be investigated as a Christian. I will be watching those other documentaries you listed. I really enjoyed the first two and so did my wife. Really makes you think once you’ve done a little investigating. I will stick with the KJV that I know I can trust, who people risked their lives to get to the people and which God has been faithfully using for hundreds of years to call out His people and is a lamp to our feet.I should add that: Lamp in the Dark Tares Among the Wheat Are both also found for free on Amazon Prime streaming video for anyone with Amazon Prime membership. |
|
|
1/31/18 2:34 PM |
Kev | | US | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: Kev, I think that was just an error, and I saw it as such. Lurker was actually writing to Connor not you. Mighty big error. I’m not quite sure how it could of been read like that or how it could of arrived at the edited format it got posted. |
|
|
1/30/18 9:23 AM |
Kev | | US | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Connor. You know that everything that White says relies on the assumption that the two most heavily edited, suposidly oldest and from questionable sources are the most accurate. I have a hard time trusting the sources of these manuscripts when like a 100 years earlier the groups conected with them were burning people for giving the Bible to the people.About 2 Peter 1:1(KJV) 1 Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: If you let scripture interpret scripture it is easy to understand who Jesus Christ is. View that verse in light of this verse Isaiah 43:11 (KJV) 11 I, even I, am the Lord; and BESIDE ME THERE IS NO SAVIOR. I think the Isaiah 43:11 rule is much more convincing than a translation rule that was made around 2000 years after the language. I think telling people they have no word of God to turn to in English only translations is a pretty sad position. How is that gonna make people feel? Who do they now have to turn to for answers? God talks to His people through His word. I was a NASB guy and from my own personal studies found the KJV to be much more accurate. I would suggest at least cross referencing W/KJVinstudy |
|
|
1/29/18 9:51 PM |
Kev | | US | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
1 Peter 1 King James Version (KJV)1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, 1 Peter 1 New American Standard Bible (NASB) 1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who reside as aliens, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, who are chosen http://www.textusreceptusbibles.com/Interlinear/60001001 Check my link of what the manuscripts have. More agree with the KJV then the NASB. I don’t think that was a good example at all Connor. Doesn’t that say something for the accuracy of the KJV, that’s the best “mistake” you can point out? I will check into the next verse you listed tomorrow. |
|
|
1/29/18 1:49 PM |
Kev | | US | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Connor7 wrote: 1.Hebrews 12:14 you could misinterpret that verse to teach works salvation, 2.the KJV is simply that, a translation. Sixth, I gotta go. 1. I view that holiness without which no man will see the Lord is that holiness that is by the imputed righteousness of Christ as all we have by the law is filthy rags. I know how some interpret that verse but view it in light of this verse:Matthew 6:33 33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and HIS RIGTHEOUSNESS; and all these things shall be added unto you. We are to seek after HIS RIGTHEOUSNESS which is by faith which is the holiness without which no man will see the Lord. 2. When you call any version just a translation then it sure at least sounds like you are putting down the word of God Connor. I hope you can see that. Maybe this is why some are upset because they feel there is no word of God for anyone in the English language. Your examples of how we can get false doctrine from the KJ Bible was not valid and I’m sure that is one of the best examples you can give. Do you have an english version you can turn to as absolutely authoritative for you? I didn’t say you affirm those trans. You have a good day Connor. — Come on Tim play nice with your southern brothers. |
|
|
1/29/18 12:20 PM |
Kev | | US | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
What is the word of God according to the Bible:1 Peter 1:23 23 BEING BORN AGAIN, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the WORD OF GOD, which liveth and abideth for ever. The word of God is the incorruptible seed which someone is born again by. I think it would be silly to say some are not born again through new translation reading and preaching so by definition there is the word of God in them. To say they are sewage is not right. To say some VERSES that have false doctrine in them are sewage is fair to say. The word of God is also said to be a light to our feet. If you don’t think there is any light from other versions is not right. I am a KJV only user as I believe that the KJV is my final authority because there is no part in it which I believe I can get false doctrine from, can I say that about other newer versions? No. But I believe that the word of God is the power of God unto salvation and any version that God uses to call out His people by definition is the word of God. — Connor do you believe the newer versions to be a final authority or can you get false doctrine from reading them? Can you show where you can get false doctrine from the KJV? — Tim Frank is definitely a Bible believing Christian. Your making us who only use the KJV look bad |
|
|
1/17/18 7:04 PM |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Dr. Tim wrote: Ladybug, the things I said to you were vicious and cruel, and I sincerely apologize for them. The reason I never answer your questions about doctrine is because we have doctrinal differences that will not be resolved until we are both in heaven and the Lord teaches both of us perfect knowledge. You won't convince me and I won't convince you to change beliefs, so it's pointless to argue with each other. very cool Dr. Tim that shows a lot of strength! You are setting an excellent example! |
|
|
1/17/18 6:32 PM |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: Kev, that is actually a lie. It comes by way of an exaggeration, designed to make me out to be always calling people devils. So it is effectively yet another misrepresentation. I don’t see how you can get from my response that I lied? I see you think you are innocent in all this by lack of wanting to claim any part in all this. I see you have a problem in recognizing YOUR own part and not wanting to admit when you are wrong (not only in this situation). That is not a good thing. Hopefully you do a little soul searching as your comment was to point the finger somewhere else and not take any consideration of what I said. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|