What about the names of the father and the mother on a birth certificate? Is that good?
Is the birth certificate an evil document?
If the state is antichrist, or as Albert Jay Nock would say, antisocial, then why should we believe that such a document (no matter what the document actually says at this point) is something honest and good?
The Lord saith, through Paul: But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach; that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
Thank you for your words. But, what of your works?
The Lord saith: Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
And why, Lyn, do you fervently defend an antichristian system and make fun of other professing Christians and their beliefs that are contrary to what you are trained to believe?
Oh Lyn, Lyn, Lyn - why do you continue to harass me with your childish behavior? You started in on me first by defending your theory as if it is truth, only because that theory comes from an antichristian system of global power, a system that oppresses, exploits, and terrorizes mankind - a system that sets itself up as God demanding homage and allegiance to it.
You then actually "condemned" me first: "AAC and Banned~ do you know how to separate the truth from lies? It's quite simple, study what the Muslims really believe, and compare that to the Holy Bible, authored by the One True God, the Ancient of Days, the Great I Am, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. That should settle this matter. NO ONE can defend the Muslim faith, even just a little, and be a 'born from above' believer in Christ,..."
And I said: "Lyn, it's actually more simple than that! The Muslims reject Jesus Christ so I know what they believe, and I sure ain't defending their antichristian sect."
You then asked 2 posts later: "If you claim to be a Christian, can you defend the Muslim faith?"
And I responded once again: "I already said I do not defend the Muslim antichristian sect,..."
But anyway, are you telling me my "accusation" statement is false?
John UK wrote: "But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table." Matthew 15:24-27. So Children = J--s? Dogs = G------s?
Ok, me again: That's my understanding, children being the Jews, dogs being the Gentiles.
John UK wrote: "And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom;" Luke 16:22. Does this mean that when we believers die, we will be carried by angels into the bosom of the Jew Abraham?
Irritated: John Weaver said in his sermon I posted that Jesus wasn't Jewish.
"I have been to Israel and I have seen first-hand how the press distorts the news regarding Israel."
This is very interesting with all discussion regarding prophecy and its interpretation. How do we know what's really going on over there? Do we interpret prophecy according to what [URL=http://www.thenation.com/special/bigten.html]]]Media[/URL] says?
Lyn, I've read more of your past posts, briefly, and they do seem to generally have the pro-state/anti-conspiracy mentality.
I am rather boggled with your insistence on me extracting scripture to prove that your faith in antichrist (since you haven't said my statement is false) is wrong. I think if there's any extracting and "proof texting" going on it should be you defending king Caesar, no? Did not the Jews reject King Jesus?
And I'm not a disciple of Texe Marrs.
Lyn writes: "As for the U.S. military/christian faith thing, I have no clue what the world you are talking about."
I figured that. Try reading the Propaganda quotes I posted.
"Your views are essentially grounded upon the state and his controlled media mouthpiece - your position is a position of faith and trust, and that, my dear fellow human being, will guarantee your eternal torment for denying the Lord Jesus Christ according to your works. If you, like so many others, already have faith and trust in a SYSTEM of antichrist and vehemently defend it, why would you not have faith and trust in a future man called Antichrist?"
After all your rants against "conspiracy theories", are you telling me this above statement is false?
Lyn, if there's only one way to eternal life, that being Jesus Christ, which is clear in the holy scriptures, then what is the obvious consequence for all those broad road folks that deny him? Isn't this a simple truth? Can I speak simple truth? I can tell people they're saved, but I can't say they're not saved?
Is the U.S. Military faith the Christian faith?
"Don": Why do you insist I have a problem? What is this problem you allege? Define "normal people."
[URL=http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/shaffer8.html]]]Will the Real Paranoids Please Raise Their Hands?[/URL]
"When one dares to dig beneath the surface of governmental programs to reveal undisclosed purposes, he or she is usually met with charges of being a "paranoid" defender of "conspiracy theories." More often than not, such an accusation silences the questioner, as it is designed to do. I long ago came to the conclusion that those who chastise others for spouting "conspiracy theories" tend to do so because they donâ€™t want the implications of their own schemes revealed to the public. "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!," intoned the Wizard of Oz, an admonition designed to intimidate the inquisitive into silence."
"For those who are paying attention, the incongruity of the critics of conspiracy theories should be apparent. "We are busy conducting wars against sinister foreign conspiracies,"they might argue, "and anyone who suggests that we might be engaged in conspiracies of our own, are â€˜paranoids.â€™" "They" conspire, in other words, but "we" do not. A childishly simple explanation for consumption by childishly simple minds."
Uh, ok Lyn...I think you're spinning me around here, and I really don't think you can handle nor do you want to handle the simple things I'm saying. But let me address your words briefly again: You ask why I'm worried? What am I supposedly worried about? Did I say I was worried? Who are the ones worried and paranoid about the Muslims?
Your views are essentially grounded upon the state and his controlled media mouthpiece - your position is a position of faith and trust, and that, my dear fellow human being, will guarantee your eternal torment for denying the Lord Jesus Christ according to your works. If you, like so many others, already have faith and trust in a SYSTEM of antichrist and vehemently defend it, why would you not have faith and trust in a future man called Antichrist?
PS: I already said I do not defend the Muslim antichristian sect, and I think my added post should answer your recent questions.
Also, if you claim to be a Christian, can you defend the U.S. Military faith?
DJC49 wrote: Since Sept. 11, 2001, Islamic terrorists have carried out more than 12,476 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS worldwide. And that's ONLY the number of ATTACKS! and NOT the total number of KILLED and INJURED!
And what about the U.S. Military religious organization? How many terror attacks has it conducted worldwide and how many deaths and injuries is it responsible for?
Without dissecting the stories to see how true they really are or how much truth is actually contained in them, let us first determine where stories like this come from. What is the ultimate source? Is the source biased? Why do you believe it? If another source says something different, why would you laugh and not believe it? Besides, do you really think it's that difficult for Muslims to succeed in carrying out some attack since they hate America so much? Such sophistication on 9/11, supposedly, but now "Al-Qaida" is just too stupid?
DCJ49 writes: Have you been doing drugs with *Banned*? This sounds like an insult, but what do you mean by drugs?