TS wrote:
Jim;
The original 1611 AV translators, along with GOD Himself, did not use the corrupt Greek Text which modern versions use to support their books today. ....

Are you not supposed to prove this?

interjection wrote:
Ahem
Does that mean when Satan perverts the truth in the mind of a sinner - the sinner may write his own version of the Bible?

Bob wrote:
What versions did satan use during the 20th and 21 century to promote;
The denial of divine inspiration?
Women as pastors?
Homosexual clergy?
The purpouse diven church?
The Emergent movement?
Socialism?
Anti KJV?
Whatever prferences you may have Jim; you are a terrible logician.

Not once do we read in the NT that they had the wrong bible!!

miJ wrote:
So what? He has wasted his life if he keeps on supporting the nasb over the kjv!

Cepacol wrote:
Where do you get that I fit into that catagory? All I said is that I read the King James. You said that all of us that read the King James were warned.

Cepacol wrote:
You are new to thse forums yet you come in acting like you know better than people who have been here for over 10 yrs. You should look at yourself before calling other people judgmental.

Lockerman wrote:
I for one am in agreement with you about this poster. At least when Jim posts he at times posts a comment directed to to news article. This guy, like a few others only refutes what others have said. Many times the people were not even addressing him. Iv'e decided to use Prov. 14:7 KJV for him and a few others. Jim included

Cough It UP Already wrote:
Ahem,
I know you will probably ignore this or make light of it or ridicule it,like you've done to others.However,I will attempt to ascertain from you why you always find it necessary to act so much above everyone else on these threads?
You seem to have a serious problem with getting along well with others.Why do you always take the low road,is it because the higher road is too difficult for you to travel?
You can well blow this off as nothing but some nobody,well beneath you,asking impertinent questions.Perhaps though,it may do you good to consider this seriously.

Just open your eyes and see what people have written to Jim Lincoln. Where were you then? Or were their actions justified because you are in their camp?

Better look at the log in your own eyes first!

knockknock wrote:
1) Already posted below.
2) Yes it does! For the elect.
Are you Roman Catholic, Liberal or just plain old Arminian?

truthbetold wrote:
The KJV was not "invented" in 1611, you are aware of that arn't you?
So that discounts that attack!!
blah blah blah..

Pray tell, when was the King James Version first published?

truthbetold wrote:
No!
The Church started before the foundation of the world.

Fair Ya See wrote:
Wow! you really are becoming a hateful person. Calling everyone who disagrees with you a Pharisee. And then Laughing Out Loud about it.
Guess you must be real proud of yourself. In just a few months you have figured out that the majority of S/A listeners are AV people. Now you and Jim can forget all other christian teaching, and spend all your time straightening us all out.
Maybee after you finish with all of us ignorant Pharisees you can go to AmTrac's web site and preach against trains. After all, if your in the minority, and you oppose everyone, youv'e got to be right.
Well; I got to get back to my Pharisee business of leading people to the Lord, helping the brokenhearted, and the addictided, and comforting the young widow.
But by all means; keep up your name calling. I'm sure Jeuse is pleased.

A Ham wrote:
blah, blah, blah...
On the other hand we know that we are right! And it is FACT that God has built His Church upon the KING JAMES VERSION of His Holy Word.
Therefore it would seem to be logical to stick with the proven Version which God Himself has validated over these centuries.
blah, blah, blah..

But that is the problem with you blind Pharisees - facts are a real hindrance to your case! Lol!

From one who is not new to SA, but who has for some while witnessed the hollow arguments of the KJV/TR only crowd, and their false presumption that there is safety in numbers on this issue.

Gardener wrote:
1) What we condemn is the errors in the Greek texts supporting the modern versions. And there are real errors and omissions.

Gardener wrote:
What we condemn is that the modern versions used heretics such as the Anglican Liberals Westcott and Hort - AND THEIR TEXTUAL CRIICISMS.
What we condemn is that modern versions used the antichrist's organisation's "Vaticanus Text" in their production.

Gardener wrote:
2) The KING JAMES VERSION has been used by GOD for four hundred years successfully to build His Church and teach Truth and Doctrine.
Therefore we are sticking with God.

Cepacol wrote:
Oh No! What terrible thing is going to happen to us if we keep reading the King James Bible?

Where in the Bible do you read that the KJV is the only true Bible?

What's What wrote:
He, that being often reproved hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy.(Pr 29:1)

2Rist wrote:
Oh Look.
An Arminian!!
John 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
Note :: Holy Spirit comes first.
Then "Truth" comes!!
Thus "saved" THEN - "able to receive Truth!!"

Let me give you a clue; it's all to do with the mark at the end of my sentence viz. "?"

Now, do you want to go back and look at what I actually wrote and not what you think I wrote?!

But reading your nonsensical post, presumably as a "good calvinist" you would say we don't need a Bible at all, because the Holy Spirit can do without it!

John UK wrote:
But if thy brother be grieved with thy meat, now walkest thou not charitably. Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died. Let not then your good be evil spoken of: For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God, and approved of men. Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.
Romans 14:15-19 KJV

2Rist wrote:
It is God who saves the Elect only and guides them into all Truth.

John UK wrote:
That's four question marks, which is three too many.
Are you interested in this subject, or just looking for an argument that does no-one any good?

True Sword wrote:
...BTW Jim Do you go to mass?

John UK wrote:
Codex Vaticanus.....vaticanus, vaticanus, vaticanus, mmmmmmmmmm.
Now what does that remind me of?...

Publican wrote:
Forgive us our grave or overbearing exteriors; our greatest desire is to share what we have been given.