|
| Page 1 | Page 5 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 8/5/13 10:19 PM |
| jpw | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
human beings deserve human rights because they are not God (although created in His image) and have no right to destroy others by the breaking of God's 10 Commandments.they must not need and do not need a collective power to give them value... this is the transition of our society. communitarianism, corporate gov conglomeration. I'm glad they will not be forced to pay a few things, but what of the manager or owner of a store that is not Hobby Lobby? what of the man's right to not have to pay for his own eugenics? it seems that man progresses from one form of insanity to the next, and freely gives away his heritage. corporations having rights? then how does a man stand a chance when that corporation abuses him? what of personal responsibility of one man to another man, regardless of the collective power behind him. end of equal protection under the law. and freedom of association. |
|
|
| 8/4/13 9:18 AM |
| jpw | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
there's always the other alternative. give them gm products.after three generations one pig farmer says the pigs no longer reproduce. kids feed it to their chickens who subsequently grow to three times their size, can't walk right and do not have the affections of their chicks, that you might see otherwise. we may not even need abortions in the future, we are doing such a great job of things. funny when eugenicists who promote and run abortion programs proceed to bring gm grains to regions of the world, that we see one as bad and the other as philanthropic. infertility is on the rise, among those who have taken on our lifestyles. |
|
|
| 8/2/13 10:04 AM |
| jpw | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jesus "you will be known by the love of the brethren"fail! Jim, something I see: the assumption that the information was correct because B was an honorable man, which he wasn't.... (from your comment) and both you and I know the information was not correct. in the least, JM and BJ and others were fooled. yet, lets look at the title of your link. "the true Christian Position on War" -- apparently I am supposed to take his word for it, even though his basis is misinformation. yet he is saying that he is speaking for God and this must happen. what? red flag! the callers and those interviewed from Iraq are warning that this will lead to the mass death of innocents. so is this "God's Position" on Iraq? I've been surrounded by dispensationalists and this is the secret for many... they think this was for Israel and so they don't love the brethren of Iraq. that's what it comes down to for many.... evangelicals have their pope and rabbit's foot, or mary rosary. if I "fill in the blank" I'm right with God. (now that I've been "so good", wait for rapture). setting ourselves in direct conflict with Christ's teachings. John Mac is not my pope. Read Revelations - God's with those beheaded for Christ. His show should be called "grace to who?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
