Can you confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh? I John 4:2

I will go with in the context of the NT Christian. Ready? (I know your not but here goes!)

1 Thessalonians 2:19 For what is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing? Are not even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming?

2 Timothy 4:8 Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing.

1 Peter 5:4 And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away.

1 John 2:28 And now, little children, abide in him; that, when he shall appear, we may have confidence, and not be ashamed before him at his coming.

etc etc etc .

dealing with you Bible haters can be such a bore!

What church has made you so heretical false-expositor?

Tom: your lack of response to the obvious states a clear notion of defeat. Why not admit your mistake and ignorance?
"Now, get thee behind me. "
Ha, Im no Peter, but you certainly are no Jesus Christ (since Im sure you think he had vile affections as well you sicko)

"I have no more time for you."

Translation: "you nailed my head against the wall and I am stuck with no answer!"

Am I amused. No. Gross heresy isn't amusing its sickening in this case and worthy only of a devil.

BTW: can you confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh? I John 4:2?

Expo: We have been through the Jew debate before, I just want to make sure you still know your a heretic. Your James statements and the nonsense that he was some thug who hired hitmen to rough up Paul is, well, just plain stupid. and as always you never have "substantial" grounds for your Bible rejection, just ridiculous claims. Contending with you Bible rejectors can be such a bore!

Expositor: Can you confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh? I John 4:2.

"Now, get thee behind me. "
Ha, Im no Peter, but you certainly are no Jesus Christ (since Im sure you think he had vile affections as well you sicko)

"I have no more time for you."

Translation: "you nailed my head against the wall and I am stuck with no answer!"

Am I amused. No. Gross heresy isn't amusing its sickening in this case and worthy only of a devil.

for the catholics I would suggest you get saved, read any of the Bible because I know most of you don't read it at all, and lastly but equally as important, come out of that whore of revelation. that mother of harlots, that cult that has spilled the blood of the saints for centuries. amen.

I apologize for not having the needed space to apply to you and then to combat toms gross heresy all at once.

1st: I have never said that the translators were infallible, just that God IS able to preserve His word through a translation if need be, and need was be.

Your quote, "Same word and interesting context because it can in fact describe sexual desire. The desire, interestingly enough that God has for His people."

Then, "If it were just platonic, unconditional love like you said, David would've had no reason to qualify it with the statement about surpassing the love of women, which is most certainly a sexual love."

With that mentality you could also claim that God at some time went through the "same thing" that David and Jonathan went through.

Furthermore, what link or concordance did you pull that 'ahabah from? Don't just repeat the same nonsense you hear and read from a pro-sodomite agenda.

Using 'ahabah: Are we to have sex with mercy (Micah 6:8), or for David to want to have sex with his enemies (Ps. 109:4-5), what about Prov. 10:12 Hatred stirreth up strifes: but love covereth all sins. So sexual attraction covers all sins?

Think! Pray! Read your Bible not some sodomite study Bible!!!!!!!!!!