N.Y Times feb 17th 2009
"What a new Internet might look like is still widely debated, but one alternative would, in effect, create a “gated community” where users would give up their anonymity and certain freedoms in return for safety. Today that is already the case for many corporate and government Internet users. As a new and more secure network becomes widely adopted, the current Internet might end up as the bad neighborhood of cyberspace. You would enter at your own risk and keep an eye over your shoulder while you were there.

prince charles wrote:
thats a joke wake up, crackling is the fried pig fat bits swine flu - crackling see ? they sell it over here in small bags - rubbish joke i know but it made me laugh for hours and hours, i laughed myself to sleep and when i woke up this morning i was still laughing !

I am glad you liked it.

I tried to make it a bit criptic , but the second part not sure if its a joke or as some people on other forum have claimed the bit about a polly who has shares in a vacine company?? It wouldn,t suprise me coming from america? well or this world of coruption..

Over here A caller I heard on the radio said they tried to ring the swine flue hotline and all they got was crackling..not good.. also heard a politictian over there has shares in vaccination company, probably not true either..

I used MLJ (his stuff is copy write but woth buying )for a while what a refeshing blessing to hear a man of God that actually feared God and wasn,t afraid to speak the truth in the Spirit!Id highly recomend Getting his revival series on gen 26: 18 dead orthadoxy , defective orthadoxy..... are rippers!

Neil wrote:
Q: A: Some are, some aren't.
Question for you: how do you tell the difference? By empirical research (like Eve & social scientists), applying Biblical reasoning, or what?
"You say they are gods"
..........

Sorry for the delayed responce Neil, I dont start and finish my day blogging.But I do want to better understand why you said what u said! Bonfire vanities to those who see that there is correlation between anything in this case music and lyrics. there is nothing neutral,

If as you say some M & L are imoral then you would agree as kenny pointed out you dont need science to say what they said above, but since they have said what they have said (coralation) faith not sight tells me this fact.Every thing we do or say effect everyone that is why God said of sin -woe to THAT man by whom they come.
Mt 12:36 every idle word that men shall speak (even music songs), they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
Neil to help better understand u I dont need a dictionary just explanations would help than generalizing every one around here!
I am more confused when I 1st started lol so you would agree with what the scientist found but how they came to their conclution your not come in Neil over..I would agree over.

Neil wrote:
That is so much incoherent ranting over so little said, it's more amusing than frustrating.

So why dont you actually say "something" that you mean. And prove your point if you can.
What do you know in relation to the above report. Do you believe lyrics and music Is a-moral , can you answer that scientific question for everone?
You say they are gods where did they say this can you point out where they said this, the question is put as simply as posible.

? + Words = .........

Talk about bonfire of the vanities around here!

Its amusing you only want to say somthing without saying anything you mean!

The Bible is not FULL of Big words.
Neil you said I am angry where is my anger as you said,or are you again higher than other posters as you seem to change the suject when some one trys to find your real point.Or is it again, you have already judged that you know more because you use bigger words. Your science is flawed in this case. Again you said the scientist are saying they are god where is it said? It seems you like to judge without reason. I have set forth my point yet you like If I am wrong help me neil dont condem

Or is it that they want to appear to belong to a chistian church!

Calvinist Understanding wrote:
have to assume that he knew all about Christ.
As to why Peter was sent for- only to confirm to Peter that the gentiles were to be part of Christ's kingdom.
So what about Acts 11.14? Cornelius was already an OT believer. This passage was only to initiate him and his family into the blessings of Pentecost.

Interesting debate all- Id add to the above quote and to the debate by saying my own convictions would be cornelius knew the Lord personally.
All Jews needed "the perfect transition" to take place where all true jews who were looking for, and all they who now have HIM were togeather. Without any still belonging to the old system, that is why J.T.B who was 2 bring this old system to the new.
John T. B. was pointing all the true jews to the new testement Christian name and covernant , thus ALL those who has only johns baptism needed the Christian holy spirit Baptism because then you will have the problem of like today where modern christians saying the jews are save in the old system of a looking for the messiah if Ive made sense in this short message.For me cornellius needed peter Gods Message to bring him to the new covernat which is the same which he already had but now full!!The Risen Christ! Hope this help.