Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
1066

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -1 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only - Legacy

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ GUINNESS ”
Page 1 | Page 4 ·  Found: 335 user comments posted recently.
News Item6/19/10 2:10 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
63
comments
Jessica Dawson wrote:
Didn't Luther allow the Cross and Crucifixes, for the purpose of being a visual aid to those who were illiterate?
Jessica, but isn't it better to teach people in Ohio to read?

News Item6/19/10 2:05 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
8
comments
meagain wrote:
On the other hand, Cameron is dealing with reality in British society today...
In that respect Westminster and the hoi polloi are being taught heresy by the church - and Cameron, plus the Conservative party, are misled into Liberal theology without them questioning the facts.
Dealing with reality?
So much for leadership!
A good leader engages brain and questions and challenges what his advisors tell him or her.

That's why they get paid the big bucks, not so that they can just sit there completely gormless ... like a big oil (or auto or bank) CEO in front of a senate committee.

I agree with this point:-

Arthur wrote:
No Cameron is not leader material...

There is something about the nation at this time and experience, that seems to preclude the production of real old style authority and leadership everywhere. It appears to be endemic and not just in the field of political endeavour.
If all authority comes from God(Rom 13) then right now the sign of the times is The Lord has "dumped" us.


News Item6/18/10 5:35 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
8
comments
Guinness wrote:
Simple fact is that the Conservatives are also pro-sodomite.
Labour calls for equality for sodomites,
Your Tory party calls for freedom to sodomise.
A sadly expected news story.

What is most insidious is the pretense at religious liberty:-
"Homosexual couples should be able to register civil partnerships in churches which WISH to hold them, according to the Prime Minister."

Those evangelical ministers who have chosen to remain in apostate denominations will be compelled by synod etc that they "WISH" for all their churches and ministers to perform this abomination.
Come out and leave your pensions and manses to fester and rot!

And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's, But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life. But many that are first shall be last; and the last first.


News Item6/18/10 5:14 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
9
comments
Cezar wrote:
It is illegal to lie about not being one in order to be elected President.
I'd call it treason.
In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more serious acts of betrayal of one's sovereign or nation.
It is self-defeating to hold someone at one and the same time to be both foreign and treasonous. You have no case.

News Item6/16/10 10:38 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
4
comments
"Singh also slams the “perplexing media silence” and demands a strong stance from Christians around the world."

Time for prominent parliamentarians and congressmen to stand up and make their voices heard when the governments fail.

So much for the war on terror ....


News Item6/6/10 5:21 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
38
comments
TrainingJim wrote:
Jim ... Your advice does not seem to agree with the verse 17 you quoted.
Yes Jim is very good at refuting his own arguments.

News Item6/6/10 5:17 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
27
comments
Realist wrote:
Socialist!!
What definition of socialism are you using tonight O calm one?

News Item6/6/10 4:30 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
27
comments
FYI1 I am not now nor ever have been "Name Tagger".

FYI2 Your hysterical outbursts and wild accusations show you to be anything other than a realist.

FYI3 You have little teach anyone about politics. Poly-nicks are more your field of expertise.


News Item6/5/10 10:20 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
38
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Infidelity --and I don't have to keep count-- has the largest amount of church discipline actions at IHCC, that reach the attention of the whole congregation.
It looks as though IHCC has overlooked the vast majority of deadly sins committed by its members, at least that's the inference from Jim.

It's a strange and self-refuting notion of a church where only some cases of congregational discipline "reach the attention of the whole congregation".

Jim,
With a track record like that I wouldn't encourage you to make allegations of "anti-church positions" of others.
Just my 50$ and 2c.


News Item6/4/10 8:05 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
35
comments
Neil wrote:
The main area where Obama could be fairly blamed is retroactive - why did BP (according to an AP writer) get to waive the usual paperwork req'd by the Interior Dept? If this had happened under Bush (popularly imagined to be an oil industry stooge), imagine the outcry.
Interesting.

The "categorical exclusion" from NEPA given on 6 April 2009 would presumably be more of a current and future concern.

Wouldn't retroactive concerns impact upon MMS' competency under Bush's administration?

"While the MMS assessed the environmental impact of drilling in the central and western Gulf of Mexico on three occasions in 2007 -- including a specific evaluation of BP's Lease 206 at Deepwater Horizon -- in each case it played down the prospect of a major blowout.

In one assessment, the agency estimated that "a large oil spill" from a platform would not exceed a total of 1,500 barrels and that a "deepwater spill," occurring "offshore of the inner Continental shelf," would not reach the coast."

More unintended consequences sadly.


News Item6/4/10 4:50 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
35
comments
Neil wrote:
Surely BP is grateful for all the unsolicited advice.
Neil,

The advice it seems is not so unsolicited.
http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/doc/2931/546759/

This speaks well of their transparency and openness to suggestions.

It does not speak so well to their own competence nor to their ability to interact directly with the world's established authorities on such things.

As noted before on another thread I'm more concerned with the competence of BP and the entire offshore deepwater drilling industry than I am with Obama's.

Joe - Happy Christmas.


News Item6/4/10 4:04 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
7
comments
Mike wrote:
Since no names were provided and no evidence was given in the
"case" cited,
Mike,

This article was not a piece of formal academic research requiring footnotes, sources and cross-referencing. It would have been quite inappropriate for the director of the Illinois department of insurance to breach confidentiality and provide names without permission. I believe him. You have the freedom to be a cynic.

If you want to question objectivity in the article have you also considered that of all the thousands of people involved in "Faith-Based Insurance" the example they found of a picture-postcard family "just happened" to be the family of a VP of the company? (BTW I suspect this is more a case of lazy journalism than a complete absence of satisfied customers. I may be cynical about journalists).

If I was a member of Lansberry's little 'circle', yes I too would make sure I sent in my cheque for his family's medical bills on time! I would also help him buy a lawnmower too by the look of things.

If "Faith-Based Insurance" is your thing, go for it. But I wouldn't be rushing to buy it if I were you. Caveat emptor.


News Item6/3/10 9:37 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
7
comments
Mike wrote:
It doesn't seem unseemly that a Christian led healthcare organization for Christian participants might require the members to demonstrate that they are somehow indeed Christian...
Mike,

Not unseemly but, how does church attendance demonstrate someone is a Christian and prevent abuse of the system? That's a very bold working assumption you are making there. Will just any church do? On what basis are they deciding? Is attendance really sufficient, why not a membership test?

No objection against the smoking prohibition.

Re: the serious car accident, the issue would be whether he found a case, not whether he had a vested interest. There needs to be objective accountability not prejudiced dismissal of evidence.

Can you imagine the 'insurers' investigating whether or not an unmarried pregnant woman was raped or not? It would typically take more than 9 months to wait upon the securing of a conviction in a court of law. Rape victims have described being cross-examined as like being raped all over again, but ultimately the 'insurers' need an additional cross-examination to enforce that stipulation.

It doesn't seem unseemly for a Christian to question the wisdom of "trust me I'm a Christian" pseudo-insurance. Caveat emptor.


News Item6/3/10 8:38 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
7
comments
Mike wrote:
People who participate know the rules. Limited enrollment, no coverage for every sniffle. That's why it costs less.
"McRaith cites a case in which a ministry refused to pay after a serious car accident."

Hardly a sniffle.
I trust the scheme members don't share the road with any bad drivers ... ever.

Another observation. A sermonaudio preacher commented recently with regard to pastoral abuses of office:-
"There are plenty of professing Christians out there who can give you their horror stories if you care to look."

What a delightful prospect therefore to have health insurance contingent upon such men:-
"If accepted, members must attend church regularly — and have that attendance verified by a pastor — and abstain from tobacco use in order to maintain their status."


News Item6/3/10 8:17 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
35
comments
Neil wrote:
There's always the [URL=http://article.nationalreview.com/435325/nuke-it/daniel-foster]]]nuclear[/URL] option. But so far only the Soviets have been bold enough (or crazy enough) to try it.
So name your poison: oil or radiation.
It has been suggested to BP as I assume you already have observed, e.g.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/04/business/energy-environment/04iht-rbogoil.html?src=busln

News Item6/3/10 5:46 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
7
comments
"By contrast, health-sharing ministries provide no guarantee that they will cover medical costs and no recourse to members who get stuck with astronomical medical bills."

"Christians" acting as a law to themselves with no accountability either to the law of the land or the Word of God.

Caveat emptor.


News Item6/2/10 1:56 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
11
comments
Mike wrote:
He has to be seen seeking out those that are expert. He has to provide the means/tools for the competent to implement expertise, then get out of the way.
From the news reports I have seen that is exactly what he has done.
(But again, the constitutionality of federal government providing means and tools in this area is far from clear).

It is the technical experts themselves who have so far tried and failed repeatedly to fix the leak so far.

I agree that whinings and threatenings are childish but this seems to be par for the course for what passes for leadership in both private industry and government these days.

A friend was commenting to me just a week ago that he is tired of what seems to be having his job threatened on every conference call he attends. That does not demonstrate leadership, but the childish lack of it.

Certainly this school of leadership is not unique to Obama.


News Item6/2/10 1:26 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
4
comments
Neil wrote:
So what sort of test should a journalist take?
According to their long established public reputation (which this lawmaker seems to want to protect) the test might presumably be a drinking contest?

News Item6/2/10 1:17 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
11
comments
Please help me follow that analogy, in what way is Obama to be regarded as Gindal's boss?

News Item6/2/10 12:26 PM
Guinness  Find all comments by Guinness
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
11
comments
No President of any ilk can be expected to be "competent" and expert to provide technical advice on how to solve this oil leak.

In any event, what happened to all the 'conservatives' being enraged about the delineated powers of the federal government?

I suspect the US Constitution has little in the way of explicit empowerment of the Federal Executive in this area. Could the several constitutional gurus on sermonaudio provide informed comment on this?

Are not the States of Louisiana, Alabama etc under the duty to provide 'all other' protections to their sovereign states?

What happened to 'state's rights' in this civil matter?

Scott - I certainly remember the right-wing bemoaning the media's free pass given to the State during Katrina. Consistency and even-handedness all round would be good.

Jump to Page : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 more



Mike Berzins
Rahab & Elisha's Heroic Deceit

Should Christians Tell Lies?
Sunday Service
Resurrection Baptist Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS


Technology, Not Techniques

Hourly: Darkside of the Internet I
Dr. Rand Hummel
Bob Jones University
Staff Picks..

Sponsor:
John Bunyan Conference

Annual John Bunyon Conf­er­ence disc­uss­ing Progr­ess­ive Cov­ent­al­ism and New Cov­en­ant The
https://ptinct.com/register..

Sponsor:
Start to Finish: Tony Evans Podcast

Feat­ured guests incl­ude Kirk Frankl­in, Tony Dungy, Prisc­illa Shir­er, & more.
https://www.namb.net/podcas..

Sermon: Daniel 7A: Four More Beasts
Dr. Fred DeRuvo

SPONSOR

SPONSOR



SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
TECH TALKS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Stats
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Webcast | Multicast
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Podcasting
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription
Business Cards
QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
API v2.0 New!

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

THE VAULT VLOG
Technology, Not Techniques
Copyright © 2024 SermonAudio.