Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
1066

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -3 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only - Legacy

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ PREACHERJOND ”
Page 1 | Page 3 ·  Found: 294 user comments posted recently.
News Item9/4/08 1:39 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
DJC49 wrote:
Thank you for your (cough) heartfelt prayers, preacherman.
As I said...

And you just keep giving more and more evidence.


News Item9/3/08 10:13 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
DJC49 wrote:
Millennial Madness
As I said I'm done with the ignorance. You know not the Scripture, nor do you want to know it, only to hold to your religion which is void of the Spirit.

No more comments I'm done here.

I pray that God will open your blind eyes and ears, and show you the truth of His Word, and the falsehood of the dotrines of men your caught up in. In Jesus, name Amen.


News Item9/3/08 8:06 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
DJC49 wrote:
Ah! The Millennium!According to preacherjond, we have the reinstallation of the Jewish sacrificial system! Burnt offerings, sin offerings -- the whole nine yards -- to make reconciliation for the house of Israel! So ... for the sake of your clinging to the mistranslation of Easter in Acts 12:4 of the KJV, you have a Millennial theology in a total muddle. Christ Who was the FULFILLMENT of ALL the sacrifices supposedly ruling and reigning right then & there presiding over ancient sacrifices which NOW made atonement for their sins.
Once again you failed to read. You are really void of spiritual understanding. You have not a clue as to what the Bible teaches. Neither does Jim Lincoln. You both are products of a man's theology and false gospel that's leading millions to hell.
-These sacrifices are a memorial and a reminder to ISRAEL, in the same way that the Lord's supper is a memorial and a reminder to the Christian church WHICH IS NOT ISRAEL. Scripture is very ClEAR.

Boy you Calvinists amaze me toting your "intellect" and your "knowledge" you know all the right articles, but haven't a clue what Bible says, and your posts show your SPIRITUALLY BLIND you are, and have not the HOLY SPIRIT. (1 Corinthians 2:11-15)I'm done with the ignoranc


News Item9/2/08 9:02 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
DJC49 wrote:
Then read Ezekiel 45:21!!! It reads:
"In the first [month], in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the PASSOVER, A FEAST OF SEVEN DAYS; unleavened bread shall be eaten."
This passage in Ezekiel takes place in the millenial reign of Christ and is a memorial to the feast in Exodus of which you did not read or you would know that the Passover happened in one night.

How many nights did the Lord PASS OVER the Israelites? And then there were seven days of unleavened bread-- just like it says in Acts. "then were the days of unleavened bread"

You can jump thru all the hoops you want to throw out the true Word of God and keep your false Bibles-- but you'll be sorry you did.

"To the law and to the testimony, if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them"

[URL=http://www.wayoflife.org/articles/doctrine.htm]]]Doctrines affected by Bible versions[/URL]


News Item9/2/08 1:08 PM
preacherjond  Find all comments by preacherjond
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
DJC49 wrote:
Try this link for your further enlightenment: And now read and try understanding this:

And I find it extremely interesting that an Edomite king [NOT a Roman magistrate] Herod Agrippa I, who was tickled pink to please the Jews by killing James the brother of John, would turn around and hold off doing anything until AFTER some supposed pagan Roman holiday (Easter?).
It seems quite contradictory to me that on the one hand, Herod was so willing to please the Jews, then, on the other hand paid homage to a pagan Roman festival IN JERUSALEM AND JUDEA of all places!!! THAT must have gone over like a lead balloon with the Jews!
Are we to suppose that Herod was a devote pagan who kept some specious Roman holiday? There's NO evidence of such in Scripture. Are we to suppose that there were MANY in Jerusalem and Judea who celebrated and observed such a Roman pagan "Easter"? The whole notion of such stretches credulity.
You need to go back and read the book of Exodus instead of an article written by unbelieving Jews.

Are you really this ignorant of the Scripture? Its either that, or you are spiritually bankrupt. I hope its just the first and not the second.

Good bye and good day.


News Item9/1/08 3:25 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
Robert wrote:
Mr Ford are you trying to tell me that the above translation is infallible ? I think it is a given that the Above Jesus should have been translated Joshua.
"And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people." (Acts 1:4 kjv)
Are you telling me the above easter is a infallible translation of what in the original is clearly passover.
YES!!!!! EASTER IS A PAGAN ROMAN HOLIDAY THAT WAS CLEBRATED BY ROMAN HEATHEN. THIS TRANSLATION IS CORRECT!! THE CONTEXT OF THE PASSAGE CLEARLY SHOWS THAT PASSOVER HAS COME AND GONE, AND "THOSE WERE THE DAYS OF UNLEAVENED BREAD". THE KJV IS THE ONLY BIBLE WHICH gives THIS VERSE CORRECTLY, THE CONTEXT OF THE PASSAGE MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO BE PASSOVER!!!!!

[URL=http://www.av1611.org/kjv/easter.html]]]Easter is the correct translation[/URL]

WELL LETS SEE. Isaiah changes to Esais in the NT. Hosea chnages to Osee, Jeremiah changes to Jeremy, I see no problem with the hebrew Joshua changing to the greek rendering Jesus. There is more than one person named Jesus in the Scripture. You have no leg to stand on here.


News Item8/31/08 2:41 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
DJC49 wrote:
ALL MODERN ENGLISH VERSIONS ... COUNTERFEITS
ERROR ... ERROR-FILLED ... BLASPHEMOUS ... devil injecting POISON.
Okay, you've stated your case quite clearly -- you've made your charges. Now ... so I can get on with burning ALL my other versions of the Bible except the KJV, please give me the doctrinal ERROR(s) which so fill them. Show the outright BLASPHEMY contained therein. I don't want innuendo, specious inference, or merely variances in translation. I WANT MEAT! I want a verse (or passage) out of one of the modern translations [not a paraphrase] that is so obviously and so seriously WRONG concerning an essential, fundamental Christian doctrine that, if believed, would lead me to damnation.
Provide me some proof other than your typical KJVO bombast, and I, too, will become a KJV-Onlyite!
It would be better for you to study it for yourself and ask God to show you... that is if you really want the truth.

News Item8/30/08 10:58 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
DJC49 wrote:
"one of HIS false bibles" (?)
Are you asserting that anything other than the KJV is a "false bible" belonging to Satan?
You better be absolutely 100% certain that the NKJV or the NASB I hold in my hand is a "false bible," because if it's not, then you are ascribing the work of the Holy Spirit to the devil ... and that's the unpardonable sin, preacher!
Let me preach it loud and clear, ALL MODERN ENGLISH VERSIONS(THAT BEING ALL THAT CAME AFTER THE KJV)ARE NOT THE INFALLIBLE, INERRANT, DIVINELY PRESERVED WORD OF GOD. They are counterfeits that claim to be. Each one contains truth, but each one also is mingled with error, and they are becoming more and more error filled and you have outright blasphemous books like "THE MESSAGE". Each of these versions claims to be the infallible Word of God but is far from it.

The devil is up to his same old tricks that he used to deceive Adam and Eve in the garden--he is mixing lies and falsehood in with the truth. He started ever so subtily getting people away from the true Word of God, and as time goes on he keeps injecting more and more poison, and the professing church gets closer and closer to being fully innoculated. And he's sure doing a very good job of it.


News Item8/29/08 10:18 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
rogerant, and MurrayA, DC49, nobody said anything about baptism being a requirement for salvation. I was referring to the fact that one must be a true born again believer as a requirement before they are baptised, the same as they are to be a true born again believer to receive the Lord's supper. If this verse is left out, you have an open door for all sorts of unbiblical baptism doctrines such as baptismal regeneration, the baptizing of infants, and such.

And the passage in Isaiah shifts its subject and begins to speak about the power behind the seat of the king of Babylon. The descriptions that are given and the language used makes it impossible to fit the king of Babylon. Without this passage and the one in Ezekiel 28 you have no background information about our adversary who was an angel of God and now wants to decieve us- and is doing a very good job on you.

You think the devil would want everyone to know this passage is about him? Looks like he has fooled you into thinking that its not with one of his false bibles

And the "Johaninne comma"... thats a real scholarly name huh? The fact is that there IS manuscript evidence for the verse, so it does belong in the Word of God, and it only proves all the more that the line of divine preservation is distinct.

Good day.


News Item8/28/08 7:05 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
[QUOTE]And what I meant when I posted:
"because I read several Bible versions, none of this 'stuff' tends to bother me all that much"
is that by comparing and contrasting several different translations, it is often easier to get a good grasp on what the verse is saying than by only using one translation. Our loyalty should not be to any one English translation, but to the inspired, inerrant Word of God that is communicated BY THE HOLY SPIRIT through the translations.[/QUOTE]Do you think the Holy Spirit would call the devil the morning star, a title of Christ? Do you think he would leave out the only verse in Scripture that specifically names the trinity? Do you think He would leave out a verse that specifically gives a requirement for biblical baptism? Do you think He would change words in thousands of verses to give them different meanings? I don't think so.

And about your last post... KJVOers do not idolize a translation. They take a stand for the Word of God against books that are not the Word of God, but claim to be the Word of God.

Good day. (dusting my feet off)


News Item8/28/08 1:34 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
DJC49 wrote:
but I pay attention to citations. Additionally, because I read several Bible versions, none of this "stuff" tends to bother me all that much.
And this line of thought is exactly why the professing church is in the mess that it's in. They have no final authority, they have not a solid foundation,so you have ignorance of Bible doctrine and apostacy. So which one of your versions are the Word of God? None of them say the same thing and disagree with each other in thousands of places.

News Item8/26/08 7:01 PM
preacherjond  Find all comments by preacherjond
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
DCJ49,

1 Timothy 3:16 KJV "And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: GOD was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory." NASB "And by common confession great is the mystery of godliness: He who(who is the "he" here) was revealed in the flesh, Was vindicated in the Spirit, Beheld by angels, Proclaimed among the nations, Believed on in the world, Taken up in glory." NASB changes 'God was manifest in the flesh' to 'He who was revealed in the flesh.' Also the added 'who' changes the sentence structure and meaning. Jesus came in the flesh and was God manifest in the flesh. This is lost in the NASB and I don't want a Bible that gets it wrong on a very important verse on the deity of Christ.

Revelation 1:11 KJV "Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and What thou seest, write in a book and send it to the seven churches which are in Asia ..."

NASB "saying, "Write in a book what you see, and send it to the seven churches: . . ."" NASB leaves out "I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last." This is a reference to Christ, and who He is, as the eternal God, the only begotten of the Father, and the firstborn from the dead. Again it"s wrong.


News Item8/26/08 1:37 PM
preacherjond  Find all comments by preacherjond
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
152
comments
[QUOTE]But I will say this much now: Psalm 12:7 does NOT refer to the preservation of the SPECIFIC "words" of God. That's the verse KJVO-ers love to camp out on. The word "them" in verse 7 does NOT refer to the individual words of the Bible![/QUOTE]How about: "EVERY WORD of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him."

You cannot deny the plain teaching of divine preservation in the Scripture in the verses of Psalm 12:6-7. They are as plain as it can get.


News Item8/20/08 10:11 PM
preacherjond  Find all comments by preacherjond
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
500
comments
hidemi williges wrote:
Preacherjond,
Sadly, when darkness prevails it extinguishes any light that there might be.
True, but the Word of God shall stand forever. They'll never get rid of our beloved old King James Bible. Amen!!

News Item8/20/08 6:04 PM
preacherjond  Find all comments by preacherjond
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
500
comments
hidemi williges wrote:
There is a very big Catholic bookstore not far from where I live. Browsing the store, they have the books you listed plus; The Good News, NASB and the NIV.
I don't know what the requirements are for Catholics. I can only state what I see displayed. For the record, I am not confusung the NAB and the NASB. They have both.
Interesting thing though, is the NAB site proclaims almost exactly the same thing as modern versions state as to their purpose and development.
WWW.usccb.org/nab/bible/prefaceold.htm
And I would make a guess that there was not a KJV Bible anywhere in the place. The RCC hates the KJV Bible, and has tried many times to destroy it. The best they've ever done is get its name changed from the Authorized Bible, to its now present name King James which "coincidentally" happened around the same time that the "New" "Revised" "Standard" "Version" was published. Woulda been kinda hard to go up against something that was Authorized, don't you think? Hmmm, I just wonder if modern version promoters and the RCC are of the same spirit?

News Item8/18/08 8:35 PM
preacherjond  Find all comments by preacherjond
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
180
comments
preacherjond. wrote:
This business of "inviting Christ into ones heart" or "making a decision for Christ" or "repeating a prayer to be saved" are false doctrines that are duping many, many people and leading many, many souls into hell.
God convicts, God calls, and the sinner believes on Jesus Christ, he does not "invite Him into his heart".
God presents the gospel to the lost man and shows him his sin. The lost man repents turning from his sin and places his complete trust upon the Saviour, he does not "make a decision for Him". He places his trust solely upon Jesus Christ, not "receives Him into his heart". Jesus does indeed indwell the man at the instant he is born again, but it is because he believed on Him, not because he received Him.
"As many as received Him"... They trusted in Him, believed on Him, and He indwelled them at that very moment, this was not an action on the believers part. They received because they believed, He was given to them.

News Item8/18/08 8:05 PM
preacherjond.  Find all comments by preacherjond.
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
180
comments
Wayne wrote:
If you are really saved, then you invited Christ into your life, which constitutes a prayer. "To many as received Him, to them He gave the right/authority to become the children of God." Thus you had to pray/invite Christ into your life as He would not just have "Saved" you without your permission.
This business of "inviting Christ into ones heart" or "making a decision for Christ" or "repeating a prayer to be saved" are false doctrines that are duping many, many people and leading many, many souls into hell.

God convicts, God calls, and the sinner believes on Jesus Christ, he does not "invite Him into his heart".

God presents the gospel to the lost man and shows him his sin. The lost man repents turning from his sin and places his complete trust upon the Saviour, he does not "make a decision for Him". He places his trust solely upon Jesus Christ, not "receives Him into his heart". Jesus does indeed indwell the man at the instant he is born again, but it is because he believed on Him, not because he received Him.

"As many as received Him"... They trusted in Him, believed on Him, and He indwelled them at that very moment, this was not an action on the believers part. They received because they believed, He was given to them.


News Item8/17/08 7:48 PM
preacherjond  Find all comments by preacherjond
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
500
comments
Alan H wrote:
\"[John] Owen argued that if the infallible Word is not preserved wholly and intact, then the Book is useless and our faith has no sure foundation. He raised this concern: “It will assuredly be granted that the persuasion of the coming forth of the word immediately from God, in the way pleaded for, is the foundation of all faith, hope, and obedience. But what, I pray, will it advantage us that God did so once deliver his word, if we are not assured also that that word so delivered hath been, by his special care and providence, preserved entire and uncorrupt unto us, or that it doth not evidence and manifest itself to be his word, being so preserved? (Isa 59:21, Matt 5:18, 1 Pet 1:25, 1 Cor 11:23, Matt 28:20)” (450).
In other words, if God’s Word is not perfect today, fully preserved, how then can we appeal to it as our sure and steadfast, final and supreme rule of faith and practice? We simply cannot! If the Scriptures be not perfect, Christians are a most miserable[QUOTE]Amen and Amen. For all the KJV defenders: Stand strong brothers and sisters, bind the whole armor to yourselves, and do all to stand! For we wrestle not against flesh and blood. AMEN!

News Item8/16/08 10:38 AM
preacherjond  Find all comments by preacherjond
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
500
comments
Jesus did not quote the Septuagint for the following reasons: Jesus spoke of the jots and tittles of the Old Testament (Mat. 5:18), and this refers specifically and solely to the Hebrew language. Jesus referred to the Old Testament by its Hebrew division rather than by its Greek division: In Luke 24:44 He referred to the things “which were written in THE LAW of Moses, and in THE PROPHETS, and in THE PSALMS, concerning me.” This is precisely the order of the Old Testament in Hebrew, but in the Greek Old Testament the order is the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets, as in the English Bible. When Jesus referred to the first and last prophets that were martyred in the Old Testament, He referred to them by the order of the Hebrew Text rather than by the order of the Greek Septuagint. “That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar” (Mat. 23:35). By this statement, the Lord Jesus charged the Jewish leaders with the deaths of the prophets throughout throughout the Old Testament age, and He used the Hebrew canon. Abel was killed in Genesis (chapter 4) and Zacharias in 2 Chronicles (24:20-22).

Find out how much evidence there is for a LXX


News Item8/14/08 7:57 PM
preacherjond  Find all comments by preacherjond
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
500
comments
DJC49 wrote:
IF you had ONLY the KJV to go by, no commentaries to reference, no one to give you explanation, would you know what 2Cor 8:1 meant?
"Moreover, brethren, WE DO YOU TO WIT of the grace of God bestowed on the churches of Macedonia;"
And how about 1Thess 4:15?
"For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive [and] remain unto the coming of the Lord SHALL NOT PREVENT THEM which are asleep."
Try this one:
"For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now LETTETH [WILL LET], until he be taken out of the way." [2Thess 2:7]
If you would read the whole Bible you will find that these words are used in many other places and by looking at the context in each instance you can use these other verses to determine the meaning of these passages. God didn't give His Word and then leave us not being able to understand it.

The reason why people can't understand the KJV, but they can modern versions, is because they have not the Spirit. The Word of God is a spiritual book, it takes a Spiritual man to understand it. Modern versions are not the Word of God, so it doesn't take a Spiritual man to understand them, so thus it is with most professing Christians today, which is why they like the new versions.

Jump to Page : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 more



Mike Berzins
Rahab & Elisha's Heroic Deceit

Should Christians Tell Lies?
Sunday Service
Resurrection Baptist Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS


Technology, Not Techniques

Hourly: Sweet Fellowship in Dark Days
Rev Maurice Roberts
Greenville Presbyterian...
Staff Picks..

Sponsor:
John Bunyan Conference

Annual John Bunyon Conf­er­ence disc­uss­ing Progr­ess­ive Cov­ent­al­ism and New Cov­en­ant The
https://ptinct.com/register..

Sponsor:
Start to Finish: Tony Evans Podcast

Feat­ured guests incl­ude Kirk Frankl­in, Tony Dungy, Prisc­illa Shir­er, & more.
https://www.namb.net/podcas..

Sponsor: Free Ministry Toolkit for Pastors
https://www.namb.net/pastor..

SPONSOR

SPONSOR



SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
TECH TALKS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Stats
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Webcast | Multicast
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Podcasting
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription
Business Cards
QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
API v2.0 New!

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

THE VAULT VLOG
Technology, Not Techniques
Copyright © 2024 SermonAudio.