|
|
USER COMMENTS BY CURIOUS |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 3 · Found: 161 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
11/5/14 11:59 AM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Michael Hranek wrote: Curious As politely as I may I didn't call you "thick" What? Putting a question mark after the comment gets you off the hook?As for persecution, I was disowned by my family for converting to Christ, was thrown out of the church that I worshipped at because they went over to supine Charismatic theology such as you and JUK advocate here and I couldn't agree with them that that was at all biblical, have had death threats against me... I could go on. I don't need a spineless amature armchair theologian lecturing me about persecution. I am ready to take my stand for the Lord as I have always done, and guess what? I can do it with no voices in my head! Sure, you count me as swine - you're not the first and you certainly won't be the last. I know what spiritual power is, and it's nothing like you guys imagine and romantically conjecture about. It is to be found in obedience and suffering. Philippians 3:10 That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death; When you get there come and talk to me some more. Maybe, just maybe, the Lord in his goodness will humble your arrogant pride to bring you to know some of that power. We can hope.. |
|
|
11/5/14 7:51 AM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Michael Hranek wrote: Curious And why would you want to hear testimony of one growing in the faith once delivered and that things God in His wonderful sovereignty, mercy and grace has allowed me to see and experience? Do you want to become His disciple too? To personally learn from and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to love Him preeminently above all others, to serve Him and follow Him, even if it means dying for Him (and that maybe at the hand of Muslims, or even modern day Laodicean hypocrites) Hmmmmm, seems I recall this filthy, so sick that she looked like she was dying woman, that it hurt you (maybe not you) to look at her who walked into church one Wednesday night because she needed prayer A simple no would have sufficed Michael. So, you're not experiencing any of the things I asked? What walk with the Lord if you're not experiencing any of the NT phenomena? After all Jesus is the same, yeterday, today and forever, isn't he? You said so yourself, that that's what it meant, didn't you? So why is it that you can't do any of those things? Maybe your powerless version Christianity is spurious and not the genuine thing at all, despite all your pious talk? Maybe you are the Laodicean hypocrite? |
|
|
11/5/14 6:55 AM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Michael Hranek wrote: .. Hebrews 13:7,8 Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the word of God: whose faith follow, considering the end of their conversation. Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever. Talk about NOT hearing the voice of God wasn't that something the Pharisees were famous for, that even though they could quote all sorts of Scriptures they hadn't really heard what was written So let me make it clear, try not to miss it and thus follow the Phariseees Quote Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.... With respect, I cannot make sense of your incoherent post.Since when does Jesus Christ the same etc mean that nothing changes, and that we can do exactly what they did in NT times? You raised any dead people lately Michael? Spoken in Tongues? Prophesied? Walked on Water? Picked up any poisonous snakes? Healed any with your handkerchief, or by your shadow passing over any? If not, why not? Has Jesus Christ changed? Come back and tell us all when your walk matches your talk. Until then it's just more grist to the mystical hype mill. JUK Re: Watchman Nee - a mystical, higher life, brethren, dispensationalist should be right up your alley. |
|
|
11/5/14 5:56 AM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Shane wrote: Curious... Job had no bible. How was he able to talk with the Lord? "God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds...How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him; God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will?"In time past...these last days.. at first spoken by the Lord.....confirmed unto us by them that heard him... Do you have ears to hear? Where does it say for us to expect more of the same? Maybe JUK and MH think that they are the 2 witnesses in Revelation?! JUK No one will disagree with your last post, and if you had just kept to that, there would have been no dispute. |
|
|
11/4/14 8:11 PM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Over the next couple of posts I hope to point out the difficulties introduced into the subject by JUK.1. He has re-defined "experiential" to mean certain special experiences known by very few today, almost insisting, with Lloyd-Jones that this is a second blessing baptism of the Spirit. Check out [URL=http://heritagereformed.com/about/about-page-5]]] Experiential [/URL] for what is usually meant by this term. If we accept the usual definition, no true Christian will lack this experiential walk. Creating a 2 tier Christianity is not helpful in the least. 2. TS was absolutely right that there are a number of issues being conflated here to muddy the waters. God does speak, and he speaks clearly and authoritatively in his word. If we understand his word, then we find confirmations of the same in the natural world, even though fallen. But what John does is flit from Word based communication to non-Bible intelligible communication "Turn left... Go to this place" etc which is an altogether different issue, not the same as hearing Christ's voice which every redeemed child hears. 3. If we still have authoritative communications from God, (John is not even sure that the canon of Scripture is closed), then Sola Scriptura is clearly wrong: something John's hinted at! More later |
|
|
11/4/14 6:54 PM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
10/31/14 1.40 PM as a further example of what JUK meant about God speaking he points us to Paul Basset who heard the words “turn left, turn left”10/31/14 3.04PM JUK writing to Dorcas writes, "I bring these things up, because I thought I had normal Christianity when I was converted; but when I started attending a (1689 baptist) church, a lot of hassle ensued. And yet I found all of what I was experiencing was actually firmly biblical. It's the old cessationist thing again, I'm afraid. Some hold to it, some don't. Difficult subject.” 11/1/14 5.52pm writing to MH JUK writes, "The problem is, that anytime anyone talks about experiential Christianity, they get roped in with charismaticism, mysticism, and a whole lot of other isms.” 11/1/14 9.57 AM JUK writes to Helps, "As for revival being the norm or not. If a flower is wilting in a vase, it probably needs watering. Then it revives. Now if a believer is wilting, they need (as Lloyd-Jones said), a fresh baptism of the Spirit and of fire. And he continued to say that if a large group of believers were baptised with the Spirit all together, that was a revival - big time” 11/1/14 JUK claims "direct communication", unsought and unwanted. What could this mean if not communication not mediated via for instance God’s word? |
|
|
11/4/14 5:26 PM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
TS asked John UK (JUK) what the union that Watson described had to do with God speaking. JUK replied 10/30/14 5.31PM by pointing to the revival in Lewis and the 2 ladies who were allegedly waiting for Duncan Campbell by name. He asks TS, how could they have known this name by Sola Scriptura, intimating that SS is insufficient for communication from God.10/31/14 8.26 AM JUK speaking of revival, according to him "a restoration of normal Christianity”, refers TS to sermons by Duncan Campbell. He says, "I do have a contention, namely, that the Christianity we have come to know in our churches, is not really getting to the heart of the matter. For an instance, I would not be here today, if the blessed Lord Jesus had not spoken a few words in my ear which saved my life. Those words were "Go to Stockton House.”….I think we need to get back to normal Christianity, which you find in the NT” 10/31/14 9.54 AM Arguing against TS post that God today speaks primarily through his Word, JUK posts up the instance of Philip. 10/31/14 11.02AM JUK’s line of reasoning was at Pentecost the Spirit’s involvement was not restricted to apostles etc. 10/30/14 12.53 PM JUK says that because God has written “God has set in the church, apostles, prophets..." it must be true today. |
|
|
11/3/14 5:45 PM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: No Curious, I did not insist that people do not have genuine Christianity. So yes, I have to correct you on that weird assumption. .... Looks like you need a reminder of what you wrote. When I have time I shall post up what you've previously written on the issue which caused the dispute in the first place. |
|
|
11/2/14 5:08 PM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mike wrote: It is the way it has been used by the prevailing winds throughout history to get rid of the threat of competition. Such as in Acts, when Paul was accused of it: Acts 24:12-14..... But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:" Thank you. I had always thought that it had applied to deviations from orthodoxy, rather than resisting the prevailing winds. But, applying your definition, the following verses now make complete sense. How silly of me, not to realize that Christianity had become a prevailing wind!1 Corinthians 11:19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you. Galatians 5:19,20 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, HERESIES, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. |
|
|
10/30/14 1:28 PM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mike wrote: It would be interesting to know the process of how it is there is a leaving of our sins before being born again, for the united with Christ are the born again. Having difficulty following your point. Can you elaborate please? |
|
|
10/27/14 10:19 AM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Elmer K. Yoder wrote: Follower of the true Christ - yes. According to how Christian is defined - antichristian, yes. Why do you ask? Define your Christianity and how it differs from anyone else's please. |
|
|
6/15/13 4:04 PM |
Curious | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Michael Hranek wrote: Check it out. Spurgeon was not in favor of using musical instruments in church which as a personal preference I can respect (it doesn't affect being saved one way or another, maybe aggrevating to some, certainly not a heresy I am being battered into accepting either), especially with his spot on preaching and teaching in so many areas If we go overboard on the "Regulatory Principle" as some would push it onto us regarding musical instruments we might just have to do away with other things not directly mentioned in Scirpture for our churches like: electronic microphones, projection screens, central heat and air and even indoor plumbing. Courtesy a Q&A with Dr. Rober Morey author of Islamic Invasion. I believe I read somewhere that he did have an organ in church. I may be mistaken. I will see if I can track down the source. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|