|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ AHEM ” |
|
|
| Page 1 | Page 3 · Found: 123 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 12/7/14 7:21 AM |
| Ahem | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
Ahem, what you are doing is building a strawman argument against me, and I'm not buying it. If you also refuse to answer my question, then why should I even bother to answer yours.
Let's start again. Since Christ's sinlessness is essential to the work he accomplished, and also the virgin birth is an essential proof of his divinity, if you think you have a gospel without his virgin birth then you've got a gospel which is another gospel and not the one that's presented to us in the bible. |
|
|
| 12/7/14 6:33 AM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
Also, in the quote, BG obviously believed in that doctrine, and also quite rightly could not think of anywhere in the NT where belief in that doctrine was deemed necessary for salvation. If you could provide the text, I would like to see it. Thank you. If the Virgin birth is not an essential doctrine, then perhaps neither is the resurrection or even penal substitution, or even the deity of Christ. Can you give us chapter and verse for which doctrines are essential for salvation and which are not? Thank you. |
|
|
| 11/27/14 8:36 AM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
Tell you what Ahem, what would you respond if I said to you:
"I don't need you or anyone else telling me what I need to do. I have His Holy Spirit to guide me in all truths, to be my helper, teacher, paralegal is what He called along beside me to help me not be led astray. I don't really need your advice it maybe wrong after all."
Eh?  You're probably right that you don't need me.   |
|
|
| 11/27/14 8:08 AM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
But tell me Ahem, if you can interpret her posts, what does this mean: "Well, penned, I have learned my lesson well .. keep my feet in the boat when feeding the sharks."
Are you a shark, Ahem?  Or are you a "dead horse" who does not respond to her infallible points and comments? I was not party to that conversation so would not include myself in the category of sharks. As for dead horse, as I said in my last, the reference was not to any person, it was to the subject matter. And you're doing it again, antagonizing the poor woman by referring to her posts as "infallible points and comments", which she did not say. Bearing false witness is a sin. |
|
|
| 11/27/14 7:00 AM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
Brother, I hear what you are saying, and I for one would love it if Dolores was here for fellowship and civil discourse, and not go off in a huff making false statements of "being under attack" every time someone disagrees with her.
Now she says that she has decided merely to post up her Holy Spirit inspired points and not respond to any comments because in her words that would be "flogging a dead horse". Now bro, I am called plenty of things while out witnessing and take it on the chin as par for the course, but if a fellow Christian is going to call me or another brother or sister a "dead horse", then that to me is not really fellowship. Nor is it very nice. I am a member of the Royal Family, NOT a "dead horse" who doesn't respond to "flogging". Dolores WILL repent. Watch this space. I agree Dolores does feel under attack every time someone disagrees with her. But, that does not give you the right to read into her posts whatever you wish. The flogging a dead horse was a reference to the "subject" she referred to, not to any of the saints on here. Reread her comment. Similarly, she does not talk about her Holy Spirit inspired points. That is you putting words in her mouth. Try and be fair at least. |
|
|
| 11/22/14 3:45 PM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
SteveR wrote:
So only Protestant conversions by those that despise Catholics are authentic?
You are right on one point, there is a BIG difference, despising Protestants wasnt part of Khurshid Jillas conversion Deep deep darkness and hatred. What a guy! Can you see despising Catholics as part of the any of the other conversions narrated? |
|
|
| 11/22/14 10:33 AM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
SteveR wrote:
Lincoln is more likely to support Obama, Pelosi or Reid quoting Scripture than Graham. Look at the bright side, Jim hasnt accused Billy of being the antichrist yet Like you Graham is in league with the Anti-Christ. Birds of a feather.  |
|
|
| 11/20/14 3:49 PM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
SteveR wrote:
What an excellent example Warren sets for his peers. Pastors today way too often take the easy way out and just want full church. Even so called conservative pastors do their best to avoid truths that might impact their bottom line.
Warren preaches in the middle of Sodom, his church is full of those engaging in the sin of sodom and despite their sin, these people listen to Warren. The very fact that he gets an audience at the Vatican to strengthen the RCC in their time of temptation is no act of mere mortals What are you doing on a Christian forum Ahab? Should you not spend your time with Jezebel and the prophets of Baal, your kindred spirits? |
|
|
| 11/19/14 6:00 PM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
SteveR wrote:
Newsflash for ya John UK
Christians are the persecuted, not the persecutors. If you want to return evil for evil, there are plenty of other religions out there you can choose from.
So please dont use the Church as a cloak for that wickedness What are you doing here persecuting Christians? Imitating your mother church? |
|
|
| 11/19/14 4:00 PM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
John UK wrote:
Not backtracking on Romans 13 are you Steve? Or have you reinvented it, so that you can disobey the guv while acknowledging its divine authority. Wow, makes my head spin. He doesn't know whether he is coming or going. I know what my vote would be. |
|
|
| 11/19/14 3:55 PM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Dopey wrote:
"verse launching"? it is called presenting the Word of God Ahem; you might try dignifying God's word but that seems to be a real problem for you and many at SermonAudio who ought to know better.
It is actually the Word of God that you and some others at SermonAudio can't stand and it not hard to spot who those people are for they give themselves away by their comments. Verse launching, or clothing your own evil accusations with the words of God and trying to make out that it is God making the accusation is contemptible. You prove yourself to be the despicable troll that you are by trampling the word of God and using it in such a pedestrian way. Hope you find some fellow trolls o/w you're going to be one lonely loon. |
|
|
| 11/19/14 2:01 PM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Dopey wrote:
So typical of you Ahem. To you Isaiah 28:16 is only the word of god; it is nothing to be concerned about or pay attention to; it is only "yeah, whatever." You are not God and your verse launching will bring judgement on you for dealing so lightly with His precious word. Get it now you divisive little troll? |
|
|
| 11/19/14 1:42 PM |
| Ahem | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Dopey wrote:
You are one of the most ungodly persons I have ever had the misfortune to come across and I pity the people that follow and believe you for you actually know so little:
Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.--Isaiah 28:16 Yeah, whatever.  |
|
|
|
| Jump to Page : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
