|
|
USER COMMENTS BY NARROWAY |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 2 · Found: 140 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
12/13/16 2:47 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
""A priest in Italy has caused uproar after announcing there would be no Christmas nativity scene at the local cemetery this year because it could offend Muslims and atheists.""To replace these and amuse the children we will have classes on how to construct an IED and a Suicide belt to foster more compassion for the terrorists. ====== Political Correctness and Liberalism is creeping into RCC doctrine with the view to illustrate the worldliness of Roman Catholic ideology. The basis of their thinking is, "If you can't beat them - then join them" - Presumably Vatican instructions and convictions. Historically the Roman church has taken pagan and heathen culture and sought to apply what they believe to be Christian. The leopard never did change his spots!! |
|
|
12/13/16 2:37 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Students from Pennsylvania have taken this action to make a modern Liberal statement.Statement:- 1. We are Liberal and therefore do not believe in Moral standards. 2. We support the current (and future) decline of morals and all authorities such as family, marriage and normal human being. 3. This is what the future is going to be like. In fact things are going to get worse and morals and normal human behaviour will become things of the past. 4. The church is defunct and it will play no part in future society if we students - tomorrows adults - have anything to do with it. 5. Anarchy and apathy will be the future political administration of the future we seek to create. |
|
|
12/12/16 3:41 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
"To the Christian Scientist, God (the Father-Mother) is a Principle known as the Divine Mind. It has no personhood and no personality. A catch phrase used in their literature is that God is "All in All." In other words, God is all that exists, and what we perceive as matter is an interpretation of divine mind. Since God is love, it means that sin and sickness are only errors of interpreting the Divine Mind and have no true reality (S&H, 330:25-274; 470:9-14).To the Christian Scientist, Jesus is a Way-shower. He is someone who epitomized the true principle of the Christ Consciousness which indwells us all. Therefore, Jesus did not really die on the cross. He was not God in flesh. He made no atonement in shedding His blood (S&H, 25:6). Christian Science teaches that man does not have a sinful nature and is a reflection of Divine Mind. To achieve "salvation," he needs only to find the true reality of understanding--as revealed in Christian Science teachings. Unfortunately, these teachings are from Mary Baker Eddy, woman who founded the religion in the 1870's and are not from God." https://carm.org/christian-science-religion-christian |
|
|
12/12/16 2:55 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
"A Southern Baptist seminary president said ...... ""Baptists who adopt Calvinistic theology and practice ought to consider joining another denomination. “I know there are a fair number of you who think you are a Calvinist, but understand there is a denomination which represents that view,” ........ “It’s called Presbyterian.”""This is certainly a very perceptive statement by a Baptist "President" Calvinism is a very distinct and unique theological statement in the ecclesiastical community both now and historically. There appears to be some confusion in the community as to both the correct exegetical basis and the correct doctrinal basis of Calvinism. I quoted another Baptist source yesterday the Baptist Pillar(Canadian) which further quotes C.H.Spurgeon saying :- ""“I do not think I differ from any of my Hyper-Calvinistic brethren in what I do believe, but I differ from them in what they do not believe." Considering Spurgeon actually calls the Hyper Calvinist a "brother" is making a very interesting statement about both his theological position and the position of all Baptists. Perhaps Paige Patterson is perceiving a very unique point in the Baptist doctrine and traditions which do not align themselves with true Biblical Calvinism!! |
|
|
12/11/16 2:40 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mike wrote: Do you believe in double predestination? Well God obviously does, Mike. He created heaven 'AND' hell. With His foreknowledge He must be a believer in double. __________ Hey Mike; Charles Spurgeon is a hero for all the Baptists. Now whilst we are discussing the pros and cons of Hyper Calvinism I came across this quote about Spurgeon. Thought you and the folks would like to hear it. "Was Spurgeon Calvinist? Many like to claim Spurgeon as a staunch Calvinist, all the way through, but listen to what he said concerning free-will, and I quote: “I do not think I differ from any of my Hyper-Calvinistic brethren in what I do believe, but I differ from them in what they do not believe. I do not hold any less than they do, but I hold a little more, and I think, a little more of the truth revealed in the Scriptures." http://www.baptistpillar.com/article_166.html So hows about all you Baptists join the Hyper Calvinist club just like your hero? John UK would definitely love that!!! Have fun!! |
|
|
12/11/16 6:17 AM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John for JESUS wrote: He seeks to reconcile Himself to all the world, Jew and Gentile alike John4???? Perception is an enlightening thing. Your perception tells us that you cannot see the truth in Scripture. GOD does NOT reconcile Himself!!! GOD does not need to change!Quote: "We often hear it said that "the death of Christ was necessary in order to reconcile God to man." This is a pious stupidity, arising from inattention to the language of the Holy Spirit, and indeed to the plain meaning of the word "reconcile." God never changed - never stepped out of His normal and true position. He abides faithful. There was, and could be, no derangement, no confusion, no alienation, so far as He was concerned; and hence there could be no need of reconciling Him to us. In fact, it was exactly the contrary. Man had gone astray; he was the enemy, and needed to be reconciled. Wherefore, then, as might be expected, the Scriptures never speak of reconciling God to man. There is no such expression to be found within the covers of the New Testament" https://www.godfire.net/eby/reconciliation.html "And all things are of God, who hath RECONCILED US to himself by Jesus Christ," 2Cor 5:18. |
|
|
12/10/16 3:24 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mike wrote: Perhaps clarification of terms is in order. What would you say a hyper-Calvinist believes that a 5-pointer doesn't? As per usual Mike the devil is in the detail.Hyper-Calvinist shuts the door on the election of God by God alone. The term hyper Calvinist is oxymoron and usually is applied by non Calvinists and Arminians who cannot perceive the Biblical doctrines of grace. Biblical Calvinist (TULIP) knows that God is completely Sovereign from beginning to end of creation. God 'alone' draws the sinner to Christ and saves His elect alone. Thus the Five Pointer does not believe nor accept that man can in any way interfere with the process of salvation. This of course is the Biblical doctrine. Arminian believes God needs all the help He can get from sinners. Thus their image of God shows God's sovereignty to be weakened and dependant upon the sinners decision??? Four Pointers (Jim Lincoln's club) tries to open the door wider than God has opened it, thus introduces the Arminian concept of universalism to Atonement. |
|
|
12/10/16 11:07 AM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
The poor old media just doesn't understand religion - what a shame!!One of the contributors said the people no longer trust the media. Their are many 'religious' people who don't understand true religion; the Pope for example and the Archbishop of Canterbury for another. So a bunch of atheist and secular, humanist media reporters have little chance of perception on that front. Eph 4:17 ".... as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind, 18 Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:" Vanity, ignorant, blind and alienated .... from any possibility of truth!! Yes that sounds about right. Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools," This is the experience we observe today in western society. |
|
|
12/9/16 5:16 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
SteveR wrote: {ahem} Covenant theology is mans attempt to explain the Scriptures. It might be the best explanation available, but I wouldn't be so naïve as to swallow it as your Pope No worries Steve. You just stick to your defence and support of the papal antichrist. WCF 25/6. There is no other Head of the Church but the Lord Jesus Christ:a nor can the Pope of Rome, in any sense be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin and son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the Church against Christ, and all that is called God.b a. Eph 1:22; Col 1:18. • b. Mat 23:8-10; 2 Thes 2:3-4, 8-9; Rev 13:6. "2Thes 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God." |
|
|
12/9/16 3:26 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
"Covenant theology is the Bible’s way of explaining and deepening our understanding of: (1) the atonement [the meaning of the death of Christ]; (2) assurance [the basis of our confidence of communion with God and enjoyment of his promises]; (3) the sacraments [signs and seals of God’s covenant promises — what they are and how they work]; and (4) the continuity of redemptive history [the unified plan of God’s salvation]. Covenant theology is also an hermeneutic, an approach to understanding the Scripture — an approach that attempts to biblically explain the unity of biblical revelation" (L.Duncan)Sermon : On Covenant Theology. (Ligon Duncan) http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=82307941575 "When Jesus wanted to explain the significance of His death to His disciples, He went to the doctrine of the covenants (see Matthew 26, Mark 14, Luke 22, 1 Corinthians 11). When God wanted to assure Abraham of the certainty of His word of promise, He went to the covenant (Genesis 12, 15, and 17). When God wanted to set apart His people, ingrain His work in their minds, tangibly reveal Himself in love and mercy, and confirm their future inheritance, He gave the covenant signs (Genesis 17, Exodus 12, 17, and 31, Matthew 28, Acts 2, Luke 22)....." (Duncan) |
|
|
12/9/16 2:40 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
"And that led to a drop in overall life expectancy for the first time since 1993, particularly among people younger than 65."Now that is interesting! "Younger than 65." This is the generation which increased and legalised homosexual practices and abortion. They also display less interest in church and morals. James 4:13 Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain: 14 Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away. 15 For that ye ought to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that. 16 But now ye rejoice in your boastings: all such rejoicing is evil." |
|
|
12/8/16 2:37 PM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
"The UMC, which has been criticized for perceived liberal drift in its theology"Ah the "Liberal drift" More like a shipwreck of faith. Liberalism is the worldly religion of nominal christians (small c). These are church goers who have not received the gift of faith from God. Their god is made in their image and is politically correct thus they believe that muslims are saved. However if God did ordain the Islamic faith as a means of salvation - Then why would HE crucify His own Son?? The Methodists in this case are simply religious reprobates like their friends the muslims. Their is only one name under heaven .... |
|
|
12/8/16 11:44 AM |
narroway | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: By the way, public-opinion-on-abortion FYI Jim; Christians are not concerned about the public opinion of sinners in a "fallen" world. Conception the beginning of life is the gift of God. To stop a life you must murder that life. Abortion is state run serial killing. BTW Jim; On the term "fallen" - "The word fallen is used in the Bible to describe someone or something spiritually and morally degraded. Israel is described as “fallen” (Amos 5:2), as are angels (Isaiah 14:12; Revelation 12:4) and the glory of mankind (1 Peter 1:24). Each of these has fallen away from the heights of God’s good will for them, fallen into sin, and therefore fallen under the just wrath of God. Those in a fallen state suffer the degrading and deadly spiritual, moral, and social consequences of sinfulness." (https://www.gotquestions.org/fallen-world.html) |
|
|
|
Jump to Page : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|