Is that one of those fabricated definitions that exist only in the F_anciful L_and of the Calvinist?
It is apparent that you are not satisfied with my answer (not a bit surprised) but I have no clue what kind of answer you are looking for. Do you categorize every answer that you disagree with as a dishonest answer?
Or do you mean wrong answer.
You are one confused pup, I must say.
Zeal? I just gave you direct quotes from the passage that YOU chose, what more zeal do you want? It is certainly more zeal than what you have placed on the passage.
I gave you a three-part answer (I even numbered it for you for your mental convenience), now how about giving a rebuttal for a change?
For all your perplexing raving about honesty, I would think that you should care about intellectual honesty.
"Don't forget to tell Anon how grateful you both are that he has finally brought a calvinism to this site that you feel happier with."
Actually, he has not been the first nor will he be the last. Its refreshing once in a while to meet a Calvinist who, although I may vehemently disagree, actually thinks for himself instead of drinking the same red koolaid that you are accustomed to.
Now here is something rich for you:
"For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life."