penny wrote:
Unprofitable Servant, I think I'll back you up here on your point, because with the pressures to conform to the world, I really don't see compromisers making a big fuss for much longer. if there is any kind of pressure to hypocrisy it will be to say they are "saved" but are ok with this kind of perversion. so I think its best to do the right thing on all matters, I really don't need to be looking back at naysayers or hypocrites, there will always be them. and by the way, I know plenty of Christians who walk the walk in these matters and have good discernment, and many of those are right here on SA.

Judge judger wrote:
And first, where I affirm the empire of a woman to be a thing repugnant to nature, I mean not only that God, by the order of his creation, has spoiled [deprived] woman of authority and dominion, but also that man has seen, proved, and pronounced just causes why it should be. Man, I say, in many other cases, does in this behalf see very clearly. [14]For the causes are so manifest, that they cannot be hid. For who can deny but it is repugnant to nature, that the blind shall be appointed to lead and conduct such as do see? That the weak, the sick, and impotent persons shall nourish and keep the whole and strong? And finally, that the foolish, mad, and frenetic shall govern the discreet, and give counsel to such as be sober of mind? And such be all women, compared unto man in bearing of authority. For their sight in civil regiment is but blindness; their strength, weakness; their counsel, foolishness; and judgment, frenzy, if it be rightly considered.[URL=http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualNLs/firblast.htm]]]Monstrous regiment. Knox [/URL]

Joyful wrote:
Glad Otten gives a summary ! This is a HUGE book :
Example quote "
“The cardinal went out of his way to state that the norms expressed in the document do not apply to already ordained homosexuals...like his predecessor, Pope John Paul II, has no plans to clean house and mount a serious attack on the Homosexual Collective within the Roman Catholic priesthood and religious life” (1172).
Wow page 1172! Engle sells this tome in 5 volumes. I prefer the pamphlet overview so as to get back to the Bible. Like passerby says most of us don't need all the details to mark&avoid. Tho this guy says his details are to overcome those who try to say it ain't true.
Looks like there is absolute proof of the thesis, tho.

I'm almost certain that Passerby's post was referring to the article "The Ride of Sodomy-HomosexualRomanCatholics, etc. It's a good post.

Presbyterian wrote:
You know I am very worried about the Baptists.
They don't understand the Covenant of Grace.
They have stated their confusion about Biblical Calvinism.
They now state that they want to join the gobbledegook theatrics whoopers???
Perhaps you Baptists out there should go to a Reformed Presbyterian Church and listen to sound doctrine preaching.

Homonauseated wrote:
[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=829141559473]]]One Race, One Blood - A Biblical Answer to Racism[/URL]
Ken Ham at this site shows why you hate that Darwinian false frame of ref.;only one race: the race of Adam(fallen).
There are multiple ways to follow our
'race' to hell:
racing to the flames with speed!
as the book "Rite of Sodomy" cited warns:
“New Ways ‘homophobia’ and ‘buildings bridges’ workshops are systematically covered as are the latest political issues on the Homosexual Collective’s agenda” (1015).

NB wrote:
MS-
I would hate to see you leave as I appreciate your comments and thoughts... And even tho I haven't been posting for a long time, I have been casually following the SA news and browsing the comments for a couple of years. If theologically sound posters leave, then who wins? The offensive posters? Then this news forum will cease to be a place to "pick each others' brains". Many types of people find their way to SA to listen to sound teaching via the sermons. Ultimately, they find their way to the news site. You are an asset. Don't let a couple of bad apples ruin the whole bunch!!!

All of us know only in part. We are parts of a Body supplying nourishment to other parts, while at the same time portraying 1 Corin. 13 to all. SHOW ALL MEN THE PORTRAIT in 1 Corinthians 13. We don't want them to see us - man.

pennnelope wrote:
really?? you have no respect for the moderators on this site?
I figure people here should respect the difficult position that the moderators are in, they both have legal responsibilities and biblical.
as for Dave's apology for provoking, well said (although I haven't read his comments to know).
yes, the comments that were removed were vile. thank you moderators for removing the vile comments and putting up with the motley crew around here.

Dave wrote:
Ey true that , :-D

Now Christians have been commissioned to go into the highways and byways and compel the lost to come in. Do you realize that fewer and fewer people read? However, they will repeat more often than not what they've heard. Let them tell someone of how the Gospel either drew them or offended them. It still gets the message out.

GSTexas wrote:

Do you really have to respond to objectionable posts?

Dave wrote:
To all who saw steve r from Zion comments(especially ladies) for my part I apologize for drawing such a repulsive response from steve r from Zion, I was too provocative in my comments by the look of it.
I'm extremely ashamed of this mornings exchange of posts,no-one should have to be privy to such hatred.
Hooroo, over and out.

Your repentant spirit produced humility and a genuine sense of compassion for you.

It is truly amazing how God blesses onlookers, or those seeing how saints respond to the truth God places in their hearts by the Holy Spirit. Our Lord is glorified in this.