I don't see any surprise in thinking
a man with less makeup would like women.

The Metrosexual makeup "sissy men" don't seem to like women any more than I like to read EMIT articles... Maybe my lisDexia explains it?

Men with less makeup might also like women since they supply the lack in the makeup

Women make up for what men lack.

Eph 5:28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself."

Or did I just make up the implications of the headline?
"Claire's pulls 17 makeup products that tested positive for asbestos"
Eyeliner headliner

https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2017/12/27/claires-pulls-17-makeup-products-that-tested-positive-for-asbestos.amp.html

Mr b wrote:
An atheist chaplain. These liberal lunatics are so insane it’s laughable.

They use Sodomite " bibles"
http://www.scionofzion.com/sodomyniv.htm
"
Dr. Mollenkott, one of the literary consultants for the NIV translating committee, is a professed homosexual. This is verified by her own words in an interview in the Episcopal publication, "Witness" (June 1991, Pages 20-23). The interviewer, Sue Pierce, asked the question, "Why was it important to both of you to come out as lesbians?" Dr. Mollenkott's reply was, "My lesbianism has always been a part of me"
& U can tell from NIv product

& same company making NIV
http://www.scionofzion.com/niv2.htm
prints the
Satanic Bible

https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/NIV/niv-gay-satan.htm

..you will plainly see that they hide nothing. The Greek text behind the modern versions are under the supervision of the Vatican. All modern versions use these Greek texts which means that what you have in your Bible and what is omitted is decided by the Roman Catholic Church."

http://www.scionofzion.com/rcv.htm

Dr. Tim wrote:
Exceptionally Stupid Version.

John UK wrote:
...doctrines of devils.
Scholars may be helpful, especially biblical scholars, but come the end of the day, it is faith that wins through. And what has the Lord himself taught you regarding the word of God? Quoting scripture will only help if you know for sure that the scripture is inerrant and inspired of God.

Start with faith faith in the Bible, & u end with faith

But Gnostic
" science falsely so called"
Ends with no sure wordsS

Cultic ESV downgrades--Luke 13:8a(ESV) And he answered him,
'Sir, let it alone this year also,"

Lk2:33aKJB: And Joseph and his mother marvelled.."

ESV:"And his father and his mother.."AsJW's NWT&Rome's NAB:

Lk4:4KJB: And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

ESV: And Jesus answered him, "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone.'"JW's NWT: Cult cut&Rome's NAB

Lk 9:55KJB: But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
ESV: But he turned and rebuked them. JW spirit of NWT& NAB

Lk9:56
KJB: For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.

ESV: And they went on to another village.
JW's NWT: ditto& RCC's NAB

Lk17:36
KJB: Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
ESV: cut&NWT&NAB

Lk23:17
KJB: (For of necessity he must release one unto them at the feast.)
ESV: cut&NWT&NAB

Updated | Conservatives are upset that a top federal watchdog who is known as an outspoken advocate for the LGBT community may get to keep her job until 2023—thanks to President Donald Trump.

The White House this week sent to the Senate for confirmation the renomination of Chai Feldblum, whose federal biography identifies her as “the first openly lesbian commissioner” of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). She also identifies as "the fourth person with a disability to serve on the commission," having been diagnosed with anxiety disorder

Feldblum joined the EEOC, which enforces federal laws prohibiting workplace discrimination, in April 2010 during the Obama administration."
--
No shock to me but"the Trump administration wants to give one of the most liberal LGBT activists of the Obama years another term.”

http://www.frc.org/updatearticle/20171213/chai-tees

Jon wrote:
.. issue has always driven me nuts!

Here are a couple of good articles that give you a good overview of why the claims of those who promote the LXX are false.

David Daniels has a very informative vlog dealing with the evidence and history of the alleged pre-Christian Greek translation of the Old Testament.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBFXozZ_Zhc

5 parts. ( less reading)

http://www.scionofzion.com/septuagint1.htm

2Greek Old Testament translation into a pagan tongue and produced by the other eleven tribes in addition to the Levites is UNSCRIPTURAL &unacceptable.
2A. Levites,guardians of the O.T. Scriptures

Mal2:7-8 “For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts. But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law; ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.”
Dt 31:24-26 - Levi Alone

Dr. Tim wrote:
Some of those Chinese bronzes are pretty old, too. Come to think of it, I ain't no spring chicken myself. If older is better, I must be getting pretty close to perfection.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lTDJgtxiA3w
--
in
"Why Not Preach Mark?"
Daniels points out the Greek prof admitting " little changes can make big doctrinal differences "
God's Son missing from Mk 1:1??
The prof steps thru Adoptionism implications from this.

"Would it make a difference to you if you knew that the New Testament of your modern Bible did not have First and Second Peter? Yet if the total number of missing words were added up, this is how much shorter the modern translations are than the King James Version. Is it cause for concern that the names of Christ are missing 175 times, or if the word "hell" is not found in the Old Testament, or if key doctrinal passages have been diminished? That these things are so, with the reasons why, are set forth in the Dark Secret"

As Old Bodies losing teeth,bone mass, wasting muscle mass... senescence of the Body creepeth in.

http://kjv.landmarkbiblebaptist.net/JackMoorman-Missing.html

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lTDJgtxiA3w
--
http://www.scionofzion.com/sinaiticus_fake.html

Why Not Preach Mark 16?

It is necessary that every Christian who uses a modern version that they watch these videos, especially since the Sinaiticus is used by every modern translation as one of their "oldest and best" manuscripts. Now it is no longer old and best but a forgery from the nineteenth century. The evidence is irrefutable. If you use a modern version, then you are relying on this nineteenth century counterfeit as your Bible.
_
You Tube Videos offering Evidence of the Counterfeit Nature of Codex Sinaiticus

These Youtube videos are concerned with the Sinaiticus Manuscript being a 19th century forgery for the intentional purpose of destroying the King James Bible by replacing it. The videos were done by David Daniels of Chick Publications. Steven Avery contributed research that was used in the Videos. This material is very important because Sinaiticus is one of the two main manuscripts which forms the basis of all modern versions of the Bible, the other main manuscript being Vaticanus.
modern versions are satanically inspired

https://www.timefortruth.co.uk/content/pages/documents/1384636132.pdf

Connor7 wrote:
"intentionally omitted"

http://www.kjvtoday.com/home/should-the-longer-ending-of-mark-mark-169-20-be-in-the-bible

See the blank in B

Notice the entire blank column after Mark 16:8. Luke begins on the new page.

Same as empty argument

Vaticanus is technically, at best, a half-hearted witness to the omission of the verses. Though he considered the verses as spurious, Alford nevertheless offered an observation that ought to give one pause: “After the subscription in B [Vaticanus—DM] the remaining greater portion of the column and the whole of the next to the end of the page are left vacant. There is no other instance of this in the whole N.T. portion of the MS [manuscript—DM], the next book in every other instance beginning on the next column” (p. 484, emp. added). This unusual divergence from the scribe’s usual practice suggests that he knew that additional verses were missing. The blank space he left provides ample room for the additional twelve verses.
-

https://apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=13&article=704

In light of this consideration of a reliable translation alone, how excellent is the KJV. It is a perfectly faithful&reliable translation into English of the Hebrew and Greek original. Men translated it who believed the Bible to be a divine,¬ a human, book, &who believed that God would be able to "communicate" with His people by the words which He inspired, faithfully rendered in English.

Such men are required for the translating of the Bible. It is not enough that they be scholars of the Hebrew, Aramaic&Greek and adepts in the language into which the Bible is translated; but they must also be godly, orthodox saints who reverence Scripture as the holy Word, wholly God-breathed.

Diane wrote:
This is a terrible tragedy. When will the outcry begin to ban bridges?

Dr. Tim wrote:
Facts,facts,facts...

Many Reformed&Presbyterian preachers have accepted the theory of W-H.
Those Reformers went back to Rome. UnReformed&uninformed use "False facts" of a mythical "Recension"(&Lxx)the way Darwin used Evilution
Both are
"science falsely so called"

But so have many "Fundamentalists"- cf BJU
Tho u noted yer brand of Fundy knows the Authorized is God's wordS

www.scionofzion.com/sinaiticus_fake.html

entire series of videos giving the details of this counterfeit manuscript &
its Catholic connection.

3036 textual differences in the Gospels alone. 656 in Matthew - 567 in Mark - 791 in Luke - 1022 in John. With these amounts of disagreements in the Gospels alone, how can these manuscripts ever be trusted for accuracy, yet all your modern versions rely heavily on these two manuscripts?

http://www.scionofzion.com/vaticanus_sinaiticus.htm

Kieron wrote:
Mr. Lincoln if you don't mind me asking are you Liberal or Conservative?

Dr. Tim wrote:
Meanwhile about 15 or 16 thousand people are murdered every year in the United States. Where are all the advocates for murderers' rights? Who are we to pick and choose which crimes against God and nature are acceptable and which ones are not? Where is the spirit of equal opportunity in this regard?

http://www.worldometers.info/abortions/

¡About 9 million so far this year!

"This year" refers to the period from Jan 1 at 00:00 up to now.

The data on abortions displayed on the Worldometers' counter is based on the latest statistics on worldwide abortions published by the World Health Organization (WHO).

According to WHO, every year in the world there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day.

In the USA, where nearly half of pregnancies are unintended and four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion , there are over 3,000 abortions per day. Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies in the USA (excluding miscarriages) end in abortion.

far worse than we like to think on.