Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
1067

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -3 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only - Legacy

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ DR. YAMIL LUCIANO ”
Page 1 | Page 19 ·  Found: 391 user comments posted recently.
Survey7/23/07 12:00 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
(This survey is no longer available)
Abigail,

I understand that Lurker is playing the devil's advocate, but I do not think that JD meant a put down by telling you that your understanding is defficient.

BTW, your understanding is indeed lacking of the term "firstborn." Both my camp and the Reformed camp (though we may adamantly disagree with the Calvinism issue) would have to say that upon reading your post, that you indeed do not understand what the term means.

You should not take offence to that but see it as an opportunity to learn.

I prescribe you a clas with JD.


News Item7/20/07 5:46 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
71
comments
[removed by editor]

Survey7/20/07 5:44 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Las. Vegas NV  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
Contender, you reall need those extra hard reading glasses?

Where in Romans 9 does it state that Esau was condemned to eternal damnation?

I do realize that the Itchy Twitchy dance is a side-effect to your mental disease but please focus. You see, you can't use one perverted interpretation to justify another. It simply does not work that way out here in the real world. That's why you have to prove your original assertion from the immediate context of the passage. If you cannot, then you can at least modify it so that you would at least reflect what the passage states in contrast to what YOU would like it to state.

I prescribe you an extra strong pair of glasses with some Calvinism pain medication.


Survey7/20/07 4:29 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
JD,
There is no prescription for him. He's a lost case. The only thing that can help him now is regeneration.
_______________________________________

Contender, read the passage again. Nothing about God saving one and condeming another. There is such a thing as election other than the soteriological election. You would not get a local newspaper and at the first appearance of the word automatically assume that it is speaking of unconditional election. There is also no reason why you should treat the Bible with any less integrity by applying your theological bias at the very appearance of the word.

It's called the immediate context. Ever heard of it?

I prescribe you some extra-powerful reading glasses.
_______________________________________

Now, since I do not believe that you are totally a lost case, allow me to give you some specialized therapy.

Where in Romans 9 does it say that God predestined Esau unto eternal damnation?


Survey7/20/07 2:40 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
Nice begging the question. But just because a homosexual states that God's word defends homosexuality does not make it anymore so than what you blindly assert.

You are going to have do a little bit better than that. If you would even care to read the context, you can easily discover that Romans 9 (and the whole book of Romans for that matter) completely betrays your position.

You can only be cured from such a disease if you would only take my prescription: a 2 month Calvinism fast.


Survey7/20/07 2:08 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
Contender wrote:
"Therefore, to be consistant with the Scriptures the "us-ward"

You mean be consistent with your Calvinism. Throw out your perverted view of Esau and simply accept simple declarative statements from Scripture and you not have any problem.

I prescribe you a Calvinism fast for two months.
_______________________________________
Lurker wrote:
"Again Peter speaks of the longsuffering of the Lord (us-ward) and then identifies the audience of his letter..."

Oh yes. God is being longsuffering with the elect. That makes no Calvinism sense. It takes real creativity to destroy everything you believe in by trying to prove it.

I prescribe you a good remedial course along with EN 101.


Survey7/20/07 12:18 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
I am a Weapon of Mass Instruction killing off any theological error with the devastating truth.

Survey7/20/07 12:17 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
1297
comments
Here comes those who can't prove what they believe trying to tell us what we believe.

How precious.

They can't refute what is being said so they spend all the trying to convince us of something they would be able to easily refute.

Calvinism is indeed a mental illness.

I prescribe you a sincere heart.


Survey7/20/07 12:10 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
JD, I desire not to debate you because our conclusions are always the same we just differ how we get there.

I can only announce what Mike from PA said earlier. There is a difference in writing to the Jew and of the Jew. Just because he addresses a specific people does not mean that he is speaking of them. Otherwise, the whole Bible can only be speaking of the Christian since the whole Bible was written to the Christian.


Survey7/20/07 11:42 AM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Las. Vegas NV  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
Alan wrote:

"You make a very good point. I think it is essential first to establish who the "us" is in "us-ward."

Well stop wishing and start presenting a case silly. So far you have not done a good job. Ignoring all the rules of language to make your case is quite disingeneous.

I notice that everyone is now ignoring the devastating truth and leaping towards JD's hermeneutical error. I want to go on record of saying that I disagree with his analysis. The jews are not even mentioned in the immediate context, and for the same reason the "forcing of the elect into the passage" should be rejected, so shall the "jewish verses gentile view" should be rejected.

Besides the grammatical blunder which the Calvinists refuse to correct, besides the heremeneutic blunder of adding the elect when the elect is not even mentioned in the whole chapter, the question still remains:

Why would God threaten the destruction of the elect when he predestined them to eternal life? What is he taunting us like Edward's caricature of God holding a spider over a fire?


News Item7/19/07 7:36 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
80
comments
Sorry to break it to you Bravo, but its just not one database. Its an international database for PEER-REVIEWED journals.

I still do not consider him a scientist. Besides, anyone that believes that his dad is an ape is no scientist at all. But if you want to defend somebody that has a fanatical hatred towards God then I guess you have that liberty.

I choose to call him a dummy. I guess we are even, for he would say the same thing about me and 98% of the world who believes in deity. The only difference between I and him is that I am right and I will not burn in hell for it.

Now I are you going to get to your defense of evolution or are you going to insist on Scratching an atheists rear end?

Until then, I prescribe you with Exodus 20:11

For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.


Survey7/19/07 2:28 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
Someone who has an identity problem is sure enough a freak.

I prescribe you a life.

Trust me, it works.


Survey7/19/07 2:08 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
I must say, JD, silly cannot describe the recent comments made by DB. They are outright ridiculous.

He is going beyond the rules of grammar to try to tell me that God is desires the elect to repent because otherwise they (the elect) would be in danger of fiery judgment.

One has to be sick in the head to try to prove Calvinism by destroying everything that it believes.

The Calvinist needs a doctor. That's why, out of the goodness of my heart, I have stepped to the plate to offer them a cure from their theological disease. I hope they take the medication that I prescribe.


Survey7/19/07 1:41 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
416
comments
I know. Hopefully you will follow the doctors orders and take your medication.

Survey7/19/07 1:40 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
DB, once again you refuse to deal with the objections made and give a fly-bye comment, a strawman at that.

I doubt that God is constantly saving me from eternal damnation. I do not know what you believe, but he only had to save me once.

If you care to read the context, you will discover that it is not about the Christian receiving forgiveness, but the ungodly receiving forgiveness. The Christian is not in danger of facing the wrath of God, it is the ungodly.

For you to insist that the passage in question reffers to the elect is to say that the elect are in danger of judgement! Why would God desire the elect not to perish if they were never in danger of perishing?

Calvinism is one big knotted up ball of contradiction.

Again, DB no matter what you would like to believe, you can't just ignore all the rules of grammar and force the Scriptures to say something that it does not say.

I prescribe you a good dose of English 101.


Survey7/19/07 12:31 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
416
comments
Let us know when you have something that makes sense.

I prescribe you a life.


Survey7/19/07 12:25 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
(This survey is no longer available)
"Be sure and tell that to John when you see him. Apparently he didn't know that. "

Well if he was a Calvinist who believe that the rules of language can be made up according to one's theological whims, then you may be right. But I doubt you can even prove that.
_______________________________________
"For the record, yes, I consider the addition of [men] in John 12:32 an error which changes the meaning of the passage."

So much for the doctrine of preservation. According to Lurker, one can never have an infallible Bible so long as words are added. It is evident that he only speaks one language. And if he spoke another language, I would hate to hear his rugged translation.

Then you have a bunch of Calvinists conspiring against the very system that they believe. Ha!

You also have Lurker, as the final authority, telling us what italicized words are valid and which ones are not.

Yet, one can take all the italicized words out of the Bible and the Calvinist would be in a worst Scriptural bankruptcy, for with all the words that they have now, they cannot muster up a simple declarative statement that states that God only loves a few or that he only will save an arbitrary few. They would have a tougher time finding one with a Bible with less words!


Survey7/19/07 12:02 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
"Are you then saying that "usward" is also referring to the ungodly in the previous verse as well.

I don't think so."

Well DB it makes no sense for God to desire the righteous to repent does it? What type of people is the Lord being merciful to in I Peter?

It's really not as complicated as you would like it to be.

Regardless of what you believe, if you are going to be intellectually honest, you must follow grammatical rules. You can't just ignore all the rules of grammar and force the Scriptures to say something that it does not say. I notice it is your habit to ignore the objections made and give a fly-bye remark to ignore the devastating truth.

I prescribe you another dose of English 101.


Survey7/18/07 4:42 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr. Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
Going to the beginning of a book to determine the context of a verse towards the end of a book is hardly the IMMEDIATE context. You are reffering to the REMOTE context.

The immediate context is right there (and always there) within the same chapter, a few verses before and a few verses ahead:

"but the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men"

How you are able to give an indefinte pronoun definite meaning is a mystery within itself.

If "any" and "all" are merely the elect then the judgment proclaimed in the previous versus are also for the elect. Talk about contextual havoc.

If Peter wanted to reffer to the elect he surely would have not used an indefinite pronoun to demonstrate this. He would had simply stated it.

I am afraid that Calvinist ignore the simple declarative truths staring them at the face for looking under every rock and crack to deny what is plainly stated.

I prescribe you a good dose of English 101.


Survey7/18/07 3:21 PM
Dr. Yamil Luciano | Curing Theological Diseases  Go to homepageFind all comments by Dr.  Yamil Luciano
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
There goes those dirty Calvinists again conspiring against themselves by purposely mistranslating a word that does not belong there.

I prescribe you 2 Peter 3:9
"The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."

Jump to Page : back 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20


Mombasa, Kenya
Mombasa Mission
Play! | More

Pastor Simeon Western
The Blood of Christ's Cross

Colossians 1:20-21
Special Meeting
Northside Baptist Church
Play! | MP4 | RSS


Technology, Not Techniques

Shawn Reynolds
Behold Thy Son!, Thy Mother!

Statements of Christ on Cross
Sovereign Grace Church
Play! | MP3

Dr. Sacha Walicord
Why Have You Forsaken Me?

Community Good Friday 2023
7th Reformed Church
Play! | MP3

Sponsor:
John Bunyan Conference

Annual John Bunyon Conf­er­ence disc­uss­ing Progr­ess­ive Cov­ent­al­ism and New Cov­en­ant The
https://ptinct.com/register..

Sponsor:
Start to Finish: Tony Evans Podcast

Feat­ured guests incl­ude Kirk Frankl­in, Tony Dungy, Prisc­illa Shir­er, & more.
https://www.namb.net/podcas..

Sermon:
Where Art Thou?
Pastor James Mansfield

SPONSOR

SPONSOR



SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
TECH TALKS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Stats
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Webcast | Multicast
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Podcasting
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription
Business Cards
QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
API v2.0 New!

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

THE VAULT VLOG
Technology, Not Techniques
Copyright © 2024 SermonAudio.