|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ YAMIL ” |
|
|
| Page 1 | Page 18 · Found: 362 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 11/2/06 8:04 PM |
| Yamil | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
BTW,The site: http://www.bible-researcher.com/hebrewtext1.html Is a reference to the work of an ecumenical theological liberal from Germany. You served to prove my point again Jeremiah. |
|
|
| 11/2/06 7:14 PM |
| Yamil | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
"If you are not in the mode of thinking that you aren't going to find like minded thinking among God's people then why bother creating havoc on people that are trying be like-minded toward others who are following the word."I have found several people with whom I have found a kindred spirit here among whom are also Calvinist. John UK: would to God that every Calvinist were like him. Lurker: though we have major odds, I pray for the salvation of his wife and he prays for my ministry. Arthur: When it come to the Bible Version debate we are devastating combination. MBL: He loves me so much as I do not mention Peter Ruckman (oh no I am in trouble now). That's all that come to my mind of those I find a kindred spirit while at the same time we have opposing differences. Of course JD, DB, and some others we are in agreement in every major issue. |
|
|
| 10/31/06 11:42 AM |
| Yamil | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
(This survey is no longer available) |
|
|
7Jim,I appreciate your analysis of Romans 11:16-24 but you have a number of things that are wrong with it.  1. The Bible makes no distinction between saved Israel and unsaved Israel. The Bible does make a distinction between individual Israelites and Israel as a nation. I think your confusion lies in the fact that the Bible does speak of a spiritual seed and a carnal seed. But the devastating truth is that the Church has never been reffered to as Israel. 2. The passages in Romans 9-11 makes a distinction between Israel as a nation and individual Israelites. But the theme of the passage is a reference to Israel as a nation: "I say then, Hath God cast away his people?" 3. Your dichotomy(saved vs unsaved Israel)is impossible to reconcile with such verses in the passage as verse 25:
"25For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits, that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in." Is this Israel saved or unsaved? I think it is impossible to answer under your hermeneutic. Although, your commentary was hard to follow I believe I captured the general point of your post. .... |
|
|
| 10/30/06 7:54 PM |
| Yamil | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
(This survey is no longer available) |
|
|
Murray,Your comment is quite silly. We all claim that our systematic theology can be traced back to the founding fathers. But I think that begs the question You have to deal with the facts, not these strawmen arguments. The fact is that the Bible makes no reference to God allowing only a predetermined few to go to heaven. This is not a tenent of dispensationalism nor of Covenant theology. It is simply the Bible. |
|
|
| 10/30/06 7:46 PM |
| Yamil | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
(This survey is no longer available) |
|
|
"And then impose them on others, it seems, just as JD also does.:"The truth is that my comments carry as much weight as yours. The question is which one would be more tenable. If you do not want me to impose my comments on you than you have the option of not participating in this forum. Otherwise your complaint is quite childish. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/2/06 7:36 PM
