|
|
USER COMMENTS BY RUFUS |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 16 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
2/25/13 9:51 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
The RCC appears to have mastered all the doctrines of devils. I would be surprised, if they were to ultimately overturn this one.1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; 2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; 3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. A real bishop is to be the husband of one wife... 1 Timothy 3:2 - A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; |
|
|
2/25/13 8:35 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
TB wrote: ... Jesus is clear: Branches that bear no fruit are cut off and thrown into the fire. ... TB,I thank you for the conversation and I'm favorable towards your objective to magnify holiness during this fallen age but we can not do so at the expense of the gospel. Jesus paid it all. Eternal salvation is because of what he did, not because of what we did, do or will do. You have some verses I have not fully responded to with an explanation. This is a challenging forum to properly do so. However, I do want to say all of the scriptures that you will point to for works and all of the scriptures I will point to for the grace of God are all reconcilable. You mention, the branches verse and no fruit = fire. Now take that verse and combine it with one I recently quoted. 1 Corinthians 3:15 - If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire. A believer who's work shall be burned will suffer loss, but he himself shall be saved (yet so as by fire). Holiness matters, not for eternal salvation, but for rewards which will be good for good behavior and bad for bad behavior. Proverbs 13:24 - He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes |
|
|
2/25/13 12:22 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
TB wrote: ... What would possibly make someone want to say things like "sons of God can walk in the flesh"? This is a very strange kind of Christ-like purity and deliverance from sin that you espouse. It is pride that makes people want to say look what I do that demonstrates why I am eternally saved and look at what others do that demonstrates they are eternally damned.Ephesians 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. If you could say, I do not look at pornography like those others do therefore I am saved, there would be room for boasting. It does not justify sin, it does not mean Christ won't chasten those who engage in unrepentant sin, but it does mean the shed blood of Jesus Christ is sufficient to cover the sins of all men that receive his free gift of salvation. 1 Corinthians 3:15 - If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire. |
|
|
2/24/13 8:19 PM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
TB wrote: Rufus: "Nor can one evaluate whether one is saved or unsaved according to their fruit." Really? I think that many want to think this because they suppose they are justified IN their sin. Try this instead, as Jesus said: "by their fruits ye shall know them... depart from me ye that work iniquity." ...Those who are led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God! Faith without works is dead. The "them" in "ye shall know them by their fruits" is a reference to false prophets not to whether one is bought by the blood of Jesus Christ. Matthew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Sons of God can walk in the flesh or walk after the spirit. Examples are many but consider the slayer of Goliath, and the murderer of Uriah sometimes he walked after the flesh, sometimes after the spirit. Consider Peter, a saved disciple that was told by Jesus Christ to get behind me Satan. Every moment of every day we choose to walk right or wrong, because we sometimes choose wrong does not mean we are disowned by our father. |
|
|
2/22/13 8:46 PM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mr b wrote: Why aren't we in an uproar over this? The musliums would be literally killing people. I'm not really in an uproar for it was already pretty clear that Lorne Lipowitz (not Lorne Mohammed, or Lorne Ahmed etc.) was a christ-hater. In a way it's a good thing for maybe now Christians will see clearly on this matter and stop being partakers of such programming. |
|
|
2/21/13 1:14 PM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Kyle wrote: I would start with The Creature From Jekyll Island by Ed Griffin. From there, I would read Modern Money Mechanics published by the Federal Reserve. Just my 371.25 grains here but... Before G. Edward Griffin there was Eustace Mullins and the Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Pretty much all works that have come since on this topic, have merely jumped on the shoulders of the one who did all the heavy lifting. |
|
|
2/20/13 10:51 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: If Benedict XVI did something illegal then he should go on trial. And how can anybody in their right mind state that the Catholic Church is a Cult? The Catholic Church does not fit the definition of a Cult which is a religious organization that does not worship Jesus as God and denies the Holy Trinity. The Catholic Church has always worshipped Jesus as God and believes in the Holy Trinity. From where do you get this definition? |
|
|
2/19/13 5:26 PM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
there is hope wrote: Society requires protection from and in a fallen world so God allows the military in all its forms... Who protects society from the military in all its forms? Name something that has killed more human beings throughout history than the state. Death by the state far, far, far exceeds death by "mass murderers". |
|
|
2/18/13 4:39 PM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Rufus may I point out, Proverbs 5 ... I would say watching too many televangelists will also soften the brain. You may point that out Jim and if you think an infinite God can not have more than one meaning to what he tells his creatures...well that's a rather simple approach to scripture. I think it means (at a minimum) be faithful to your wife and drink clean water and don't lean on your state god (or whatever other source) to provide it for you. I intend to apply both meanings. |
|
|
2/18/13 11:50 AM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
jpw wrote: glad someone enjoys a little dry humor. do you have a good water filter? ... I do not have a satisfactory clean water solution at this time. We buy filtered water for drinking and cooking and have chlorine filters on our shower heads etc. but the only way to really manage this properly in my mind is to...Proverbs 5:15 - Drink waters out of thine own cistern, and running waters out of thine own well. ...and so long as I'm in the city I can't get this done. Therefore, I am intending a relocation this year to a more rural environment for this and other reasons. How about yourself? Do you have a recommended filter that gets out fluoride? |
|
|
2/16/13 7:03 PM |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: First of all I'm sympathetic to this family. It would have been good if the Justice Dept. had stayed away from this, one has to remember though, if Christians get to home school, so do [URL=http://bibleprobe.com/muhammad.htm]]]Muhammad[/URL]ans. [URL=http://www.jpost.com/LandedPages/PrintArticle.aspx?id=303353]]]Behind the Lines: Conquest through proselytizing[/URL]. Germany has a big Islamic problem, and thanks to the likes of Bush--and others we imported many anti-American Islamists into this country as well. So, I can see Germany's problem, we should not be the ones trying to fix their mess, by sending back people who apparently worthwhile members of American society, and our obeying our laws. Perhaps deportation of Islamists who are disobeying our laws should be pushed more vigorously? Once again an attack on religious liberty coming from a non-Islamic source (Eric Holder is an Episcopalian) but don't look at the source blame Islam? Islam is to Christianity in America what Lee Harvey Oswald was to John F. Kennedy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|