fake news wrote:
two different events. I see. You proved your point, sorry I falsely accused you of putting forth fake news.
One more question, would you name the Trump policies that have been impacted by that picture?

Jim Lincoln wrote:
IE, everything that happens in a President's term of office is his fault!
Northern and Southern California have a lot of differences, so they might want to split sometime in the future. So while states can't secede from the Union they can split up etc., so who knows what might happen. An interesting history lesson about Texas, [URL=/czybnk]]]http://tinyurl.com/czybnk (The Great Divide---Was Texas authorized to divide into five states?)[/URL]

ladybug wrote:
Christopher
You are being baited. Please do not give opportunity for the RCC to be presented in any other light than what it truly is - a Satanic religion that damns all who are deceived by it. Don't be fooled by the newfound 'hospitality' of the Jesuit troll.

Christopher000 wrote:
I'll have to get back to you because I've never even considered that. I'm not quite sure how to answer right now.

penned wrote:
other than
Ukraine fascists
BLM
Syria
collapsing markets
intervening in elections
sharia-izing Europe
is there a problem?

Thank you for answering my question about confirmation in the RCC. I'm trying to understand the position many put forward on this board. The position that the RCC is a satanic institution unable to merit any good. An institution so satanic that they wont attend any Mass, even a baptism, wedding or funeral. Therein lies my first issue. Do you view your sacred and holy marriage as something unholy done at the feet of Satan? There are Anabaptists, but there aren't Anamarriagists. Even after you leave the RCC, you are still married, a marriage officiated by minion of Satan. Can a True Biblical union take place at the RCC? If yes, then shouldn't antiRCC people be willing to attend a holy sacred event like a RCC wedding? If no, why do even antiRCC Churches view them as valid. I know Paul doesn't say one remarries, but then again Paul didn't say to rebaptize people that were initially too young to understand their commitment or as you say the Gospel Message

You were baptized and married in the RCC, were you confirmed?

let me help your discussion wrote:
“Under federal law, the executive branch [of the United States of America] is expressly required to take religion into account in determining who is granted asylum. Under the provision governing asylum (section 1158 of Title 8, US Code), an alien applying for admission must establish that Â… religion [among other things] … was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant.”
And it is in the federal statutes!
“Moreover, to qualify for asylum in the United States, the applicant must be a ‘refugee’ as defined by federal law. That definition (set forth in Section 1101(a)(42)(A) of Title , US Code) also requires the executive branch to take account of the alienÂ’s religion: The term ‘refugee’ means (A) any person who is outside any country of such personÂ’s nationality … and who is unable or unwilling to return to … that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of … religion [among other things] …[.]”
http://tinyurl.com/pfee4nq

ladybug wrote:
Speaking of wicked, how many monikers do you use Steve R? Is that the only moniker you post here with?
Have you ever used the moniker 'philadelphia'?

Psalms 127:2   It is vain for you to rise up early, to sit up late, to eat the bread of sorrows: for so he giveth his beloved sleep.

Revelation 14:10   The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:

pennelope wrote:
someone signs an antiabortion document and they are ruined for life doesn't work in my book.

penned wrote:
yes he did scold them and Pence came with his wife to deliver a speech at the event.

Christopher000 wrote:
do that all by themselves.
No knowledgeable Christian can, in good conscious, defend a religious system which, so arrogantly and defiantly, works against God Himself. We pray for the people, but hate the system which deceives them...

Christopher000 wrote:
Not looking to continue a thread that was shut down, but wanted to respond do to your comment, Ladybug. Thanks for the advice, and I do remember. Honestly, I'm unclear on what a Jesuit even is. I've heard it enough as an insult, so it's time I take a look, I guess. I had assumed it was synonymous with Roman Catholic, basically.

Its no wonder you fear them, you don't understand them. And now the fake oath is trotted out. You guys have been so beguiled, its pitiful

2 Thessalonians 2:10   And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

 2 Thessalonians 2:10   And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

  2 Thessalonians 2:11   And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

Ignominious Emirakan wrote:
People who say that Hitler wasn't really elected are usually germanophiles who search for excuses for crimes of NAZI Germans
The idea that Hitler wasn’t elected democratically is an allusion to the fact that he never got more than 50% of the votes (the best result was some 44%).