So let me see if I'm understanding you correctly. It's now considered the "liberal media spin" to point out that socking someone in the face is wrong? Interesting. As far as I'm concerned, I don't really care who the guy was socking in the face, whether he was paid, or how liberal he is or isn't. I care that one man needlessly attacked another just because of his political stance! If a Cruz supporter were to attack a Trump supporter, I would be equally upset. Now, it should be noted that the Cruz crowd tends to not violently attack others as many of these Trump supporters do, and I generally don't hear death threats coming from Cruz supporters. Just saying. But, maybe that's just a coincidence. But then again, I don't recall Cruz telling rally attendants to beat the h*ll, cr*p, etc. out of protesters like Trump has. But Trump is so peace-loving that he encourages rage and violence, right? Is that another "liberal" thing to say? Am I not allowed to point out facts that speak against Tru

If you take the time to watch the video of the protester that got sucker-punched by the Trump supporter, the protester did not attack anyone. He did the finger (not even directed at the supporter who attacked him), and began to walk up the steps with both of his hands at his sides. When he neared the top, the Trump supporter clocked him hard in the face, sending him to the ground. I don't care if the protesters were funded by Hillary or Black Lives Matter, it is never right to attack a man when they aren't attacking you. And just so I get this right, these Trump supporters show up to a rally held by a man who has frequently dropped the f bomb, called other candidates a vulgar word for private parts, and talks about his own private parts at a national debate, and they're fine with that, but when someone gives them the finger they beat them? Really? Talk about a double standard.

Is ignoring people really the way to treat them? I agree we should ignore Sneaky, but everyone who's "new" doesn't deserve to be ignored. I have been on here for a while, and so have other posters you are calling "new". And I have failed to see this correlation with all "new" posters always poping up at the same time. Rather, I have seen plenty of threads were some of these so called "new" commenters have posted, while others have not. There is no consistent correlation. And, after all, you pop in and out of threads as well. That's what everyone on here does! Some of us may be busy, and not able to comment everywhere at every time.

All the better!

Calling everyone but your man "whores" is not the Christian thing to do. I believe Trump is a very evil man, but I have never called him a "whore"! You need to watch your tongue. I see you called Chrisgp a "fool" in one of your comments. It's not up anymore, because either the moderators rightly removed it, or you felt guilty and changed it yourself.

I accept your apology. It would have been nice, however, if you had said that before you spent two comments needlessly attacking me. I had not said anything to warrant such an attack. Again, I forgive you, but I think all of us, including myself, should do some self-examination.

Under your logic, you just inserted yourself into this conversation. I did not steamroll anyone, I simply pointed out a logical error in Lurker's comment. But I guess only people like you and Lurker are smart enough to do that, and I must just be stupid, and my comments must be worthless. Is that what you are saying?