MurrayA wrote:
Are now now claiming to be a medical doctor? Yes or no?
If no, then get off your high, but phantom horse!

MurrayA wrote:
I will never stoop to pretentiously calling myself "Doctor of Truth", "Weapon of Mass Instruction", and other such specious epithets.
I will never, may the Lord forbid, in rash conceit, pretend to issue "devastating truths" to all and sundry, and put down opposition as "elitist" merely because they contradict my cherished shibboleths.

MurrayA wrote:
This is my final word to you. Hereafter ALL posts by you, even if addressed to me or spoken about me, will be ignored.

And the time before that.

My comments to Wayne has nothing to do with Calvinisme but the same hermeneutic which he uses to reject God's clear declarative statements. I hope you understand that Calvinism consists much more than just unconditional election.

Concerning your comment on marriage. Noone ever said that doing the Lord's will would be easy. I think you can gather my sentiments from the posts I have given to a wife for life.

I guess everyone is quick to forget what an alias is?

Besides, if you read correctly, it is not an academic doctorate. The alias stands for a medical doctor.

The pun is that you guys have a theological disease, and I am gracious enough to provide for you the cure.

Of course you all know that, but it is easier for you to tediously look for an ad hominem than it is for you to give an original exegetical rebuttal.

oops. I should've proofread. Too late now.

Oh well, let them swallow the camel and choke on the gnat.

_______________________________________
Amen JD.

Wayne M. wrote:
wife for life,
You should be aware Abigail has some erroneous ideas about marriage and divorce. She doesn't believe there is such a thing as a divorce on biblical grounds. She is the worst person to discuss the subject with. In fact, if you have followed the debates on here, she is heretical on most fundamental biblical matters.

However...

He is sadly mistaken on the issue of divorce. In fact, he takes the position opposite of orthodoxy in assisting the Bible gives permission for divorce.

On this issue, I would have to side with Abigail, although there are a host of things that she teaches that I would not recommend.

I suppose that the best rebuttal that you can come up with, is correcting my English grammar.

Nevertheless, thanks for correcting my English, although I did not realize that I had to proofread everything lest I get a slap on the wrist.

I suppose that in your elitist circles noone makes grammatical blunders.

But, yes, to your surprise, I am not always as eloquent as I should be. This is partly my fault, since I have spoiled you into expecting nothing but the best from me. Sometimes, when one receives such eloquent responses as those that you have received from me, he becomes spoiled and will accept nothing less than excellence.

The only thing I ask, is that you accept my humble apology. The difference between I and your elitist circle of friends is that I admit when I make a blunder. You choose to take it to the grave.

But I do assure you that if there is one area that you will never be disappointed, it is this: I will always be faithful to give you the Dehvastating Truth.

Interesting how you pick and choose what you want to rebuttal. Will you ignore the other two more powerful ones?

I prescribe you to read your Bible and forget about your lame deductive reasoning.

God means what he states and states what he means.

That's the way the cookie crumbles.

Your car and your house is in this world, so I guess from your hermeneutic, you are suppose to forsake it.

Can I have it?
_______________________________________

Concerning Abigail's post:

She forgot that when the soldiers asked John the Baptist what they must do, he did not mention anything about them leaving their profession.

She also ignores that Jesus and Paul would not use a wicked profession to parallel what a Christian should be.

He does not compare Christians to strippers; neither would he compare them to soldiers if that was such a wicked profession.

Newsflash: God does not ordain wickedness. Neither does he obligate Christians to submit to wickedness.

They believe in isolating themselves from the world and having their own little village. Not to say, the tongue-slapping fits that they call Holy Spirit power. (For what, THEY do not even know)

Since they hate everything, and everything is demonic, then it is only a matter of time before they drink the red koolaid and die.

MurrayA wrote:
In regard to the previous post:
Herein the wilful ignorance...

MurrayA wrote:
If he cared to look at the site...

MurrayA wrote:
there is an essay outlining a whole array of manuscripts, not merely Codex Aleph, the one he alleges was rescued from a "trashcan".

I am not sure how the rest of the outlined manuscripts make the picture look any more prettier.

... and how the one discovered in a trashcan and propagated by theological liberals who are still making corrections to it is the more reliable one.

The sincere reader is suppose to make sense out of the theological mumbo-jumbo that basically tells him that he needs to favor the 3 types of text that disagree in more than 3,000 places over the 5,000 family of text that are 95% similar.

If anyone doubt that Satan is alive and well, there is no more reason to doubt.

How can one have an intelligent discussion with someone who refuses to have an intelligent discussion?

Case in point: I made a clear presentation (18 posts) of my position and the only attempt someone made to refute it is cutting and pasting a bunch of Scripture hoping someone makes a telepathic connection between his thoughts and the Scripture he quoted.

When asked for more commentary, the best I get is an ad hominem.