R. K. Borill wrote: Well, Brother, Naturally the foolishness and irrational thoughts of men causes us to laugh, but when we consider the impact of their foolishness upon the minds of the gullible, and the outcome of deceit which is hell, it removes the smile. So, I can understand on one hand why you would want to cry.
Brother, I like that AMEN Thanks Brother
Someone in the Bible said Forgive them Father, they know not what they do.
I agree with the Word of God, I leave you all with this thought
Do they, do they know what they do?
(THE GOSPEL) That Through HEARING, Has FAITH, Through GRACE, REPENTS and BELIVES,
What is meant by the question? Are we to understand that faith is the reason why we are justified.. are we justified on account of our faith? Is this the grounds of our justification? Then we would answer NO! But if it means that we are justified through faith, as an instrument only, then we would answer YES, that there is no other means whereby we may be justified.
R. K. Borill wrote: JD wrote: ". . . that when any of our theology is shown to be in error, we will quickly allow God to change our minds. Please, let none of us be so stubborn that we must be correct in the face of evidence to the contrary. This is not the christian way."
JD, Your last two sentences are very sound advise. You should follow it. However, since your god must be "allowed by you" to do something thus making yourself god, I don't believe that your theology will change.
Hi R K
You know a part of me wants to cry and a part wants to laugh.
Dan wrote: missmassatxmas, Thank you for your post
I agree with your post with ref to xmass and am glad to see more Godly material published against this RCC-derived unholyday.
(Note: Please come up with a consistent ID or handle on this site. Thanks.)
Would you rather be right in the (flesh) world view. I agree Dan, a name is always nice to use when writting. edit: Although it's not important that I know your name, or you mine whats important is God knows
Or the (Spirit), spiritual view, maybe your just bad mouthing the R C C, is that it?
Or bad mouthing christmas in general? (don't have to reply)
Merry Christmas, Dan
(THE GOSPEL) That Through HEARING, Has FAITH, Through GRACE, REPENTS and BELIVES, (THATS IT)
Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children (...JD- good verse, don't you think?)
I will also forget thy children, wow, believe that? If you bought one of these toys from hell, there is a bright side.
You will be able to return it when you go to hell.
I know the Bible says something like you came into the world with nothing, and you can take nothing with you when you die But then the Bible says Deuteronomy 7:25 The graven images of their gods shall ye burn with fire: thou shalt not desire the silver or gold that is on them, nor take it unto thee, lest thou be snared therin: for it is an abomination to the LORD thy God.
My point If you bought one (for whatever reason) your not right with God.
THE GOSPEL) That Through HEARING, Has FAITH, Through GRACE, REPENTS and BELIVES, (THATS IT) Merry Christmas
Weapon of Mass Instruction wrote: Try telling us what your point is in one concise sentence. I am not sure what all the fluff has to do with the topic at hand. Is justification by faith or by unconditional election?
Lets see, Who measures out Faith, and without it, truly, can one see hear, or understand.
Longing for revival wrote: However, it grieves my heart to see you ridiculing the need for revival. Mocking me means nothing, mocking the need for a mighty move of God shows me, once again, the depths to which we have fallen.
Hi whats your name
However, it grieves my heart to see you ridiculing the need for revival.
My comment in no way ridiculed the need for revival, there may never be or has there ever been a greater need than today for Revival.
To apply this to the church to me makes no sence whats so ever. The church of Jesus is strong in the Word, they Do Not Backslide, they may sin, but not backslide. There are christians that sin, they all do in one way or another, but its not your flesh that saves you, faith, through grace does. The Bible clearly shows the church of today, the falling away is without a doubt well under way, and Few will be saved.
To me, if only one person through (THE GOSPEL) HEARING, Has FAITH, Through GRACE, REPENTS and BELIVES, (THATS IT) Is better than a whole building full of the Blind being told the Gospel of Jesus Christ AGAIN.
You know all that education you have, well, its was worth the money, thanks
check out "de" comment, I read that just prior to your responce.
I guess I'm looking for something that the Bible says won't exist, I never looked at it that way I guess. A Christian web site, where true Bible beliving christians that fear God, could just talk, about God, without defending Him. Randy, thank you, I think Im done commenting on SA, I know now why I was led here, God I hope and pray so anyway. You have my email, stay in touch, anyone who wants, I like Christmas cards
18 Coco Ct. Miramar Beach FL 32550
May God bless you all, even JD, Doc, and Anti-Guy God truly shows His work in everyone, but not everyone will be saved, Someone in the Bible said FEW. Let them with ears to hear, hear Play nice, thanks Norman, Someone in the Bible said My Grace is sufficant enough for you. Get over yourself
de wrote: Thanks so much to all of you who want to expose Calvinism. Your threads and other research of course has helped me understand better our differences. However, the most important thing I learned here is apart from God's soverign grace through the death of Jesus Christ on the cross we all deserve hell in it's deepest pits. All of us from birth are headed in that direction. Do you agree? Through no part of my own, God turned me around, clothed me with His righteousness and I REJOICE! If God has called you to repentence then rejoice. Those Jesus came for He'll call to repentence. Not one will be lost.
All of the other candidates have endorsed plans and programs that are clearly in violation of the Constitution (even with the most liberal reading of it). If the President expects the people to obey the law, he should be willing to set the example by obeying the requirements of the Constitution and keeping his oath of office. He is truly a man who let's his "yes" be "yes". I don't agree with him on everything, but I respect his integrity a great deal. No other candidate has demonstrated such consistent principle.
another man said
one man, one job to say you have to distance your christian (SPITITUAL) side, from your wordly (FLESH SIDE) to hold public (flesh) office, is lost
can't be done Bible says something about a two sided (divided) man
Dessie wrote: News Alert!!! The presidential election will not be decided by Christians. There are not enough Christians to make a difference. We must wake up and trust God. All things are in His control...
AMEN, Dessie Maybe thats why the Bible shows
1.As in anything you do, do it for the LORD
2. Voting is something christians do VOTE as a CHRISTIAN
3. You OPINION means what to God, how you feel about the man (woman President not biblical, not a issue on christian web site...) secular wise the U S consitution in describing the requirements for the job says HE, will be, He will.... just like the Holy Word Of God,(some versions, like that word, versions) the consitution has become gender frendly
4.If a canidate is not producing fruit, why hear his words.
5.If a canidate goes against the Word of God, just as how to tell a false prophet, ONE strike your out. EXAMPLE: if he supports Abortion, or a womans right to choose to kill her baby, he is a non issue... don't matter if he looks, talks, agrees with you,
sometimes I feel like no one can see this, why
do you need a Bible verse to prove me wrong, if that thought comes to your mind, your lost
R. K. Borill wrote: Jim and others, I don't know if you are aware of this, but I read a SA Sticky Post that Yamil Luciano has been posting forum notes and responses under multiple identities. This adolescent behavior is done to flood these forums with slanted views to overcome the opposition. Those without logical arguments resort to these sorts of tactics. His confirmed aliases are "Weapons of Mass Instruction", "Lurker", "Seaton", and possibly "JD". He will even hold conversations among these aliases with himself in an attempt to lure the unsuspecting and overwhelm them with multiple personalities.
terry evans | miramar beach fl â€¢ Posted 2 days ago---note 2 days ago â€¢ Add new comment â€¢ Reply to comment â€¢ Report abuse â€¢ Groups | Comments May I suggest that the I P address be tied to a real name, no Alias This is a christian web site, I don't understand why christians will not use there name, but choose to use what appears several, some holding conversations with themselves. Can something like that be done,or no. thanks terry
I only add My Bible says
Romans 8:15 For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father
Jessica Dawson wrote: 1 Corinthians 1:11-13 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you. Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
None of the above,(other)
kinda cool how christian falls under other I guess.
kinda interesting how there is no joint answer, all the above I think that alone says something
Amen Ms Dawson, again 10Now I beseech you, brethren,
by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,
that ye all speak the same thing,
and that there be no divisions among you
but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment
"I believe God created the heavens and the Earth," he said at a news conference (so does satan, Point) with Iowa pastors who murmured, "Amen
(murmured, were they not sure?)
60 Iowa pastors endorsing him at a news conference Tuesday, including best-selling author Tim LaHaye of "Left Behind" (What is better the Pastors or the book, Pre-trib?)
But he expressed frustration that he is asked about it so often, arguing with the questioner that it ultimately doesn't matter what his personal views are (does that mean being the Pres. has nothing to do with being a christian?)
Earlier Tuesday Huckabee wouldn't say whether he thought Mormonism was a cult.
(So I guess he wouldn't say muslems are a cult either don't be judging may cost you votes)
"I'm just not going to go off into evaluating other people's doctrines and faiths. I think that is absolutely not a role for a president," the former Arkansas governor said (no comments on SA I guess, not Pres yet )
While he said he respects "anybody who practices his faith," (to easy)
"As you heard me say, I repudiate anything that attacks another person
(Anti-Guy, you got to love this huc a bee is a politician first
kenny wrote: The minute Ron Paul starts talking about Nazis is the minute his campaign comes to a screeching halt. He is wise not to even acknowledge them. I am astounded at the ignorance and stupidity of those women on 'The View'. I am not being flippant or trying to insult them. All of them are incredibly ignorant and each word out of their mouths is more stupid than whatever the one before them said. It's as if their brains short circuit before a coherent thought can be produced.
Alan H wrote: terry evans, Who on earth is Anti-Guy? Sounds kinda strange, if you ask me!
he is, an example of his work
AntiVaticanistAmerican AntiVaticanistAmerican wrote: te: And yet again: But hey, if a Covert Satanic- Vaticanist/Roman-"Catholic"-Cultic Sympathizer & "New-World-Order"- Ecumenist like PAT ROBERTSON can endorse a 1) "serial polygamist", 2) "pro-abortionist" and 3) "pro-Sodomite-rights/wrongs" like RUDY GIULIANI :shakehead -and- BOB JONES III (Chancellor of Bob Jones University) can ENDORSE a Satanic- Vaticanist-Spawned-Cultic MORMON like MITT ROMNEY -- THE U.S.A. HAS THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS LEFT IN 2008: Fred Thompson Hillary Clinton Mike Huckabee Duncan Hunter Barack Obama THAT LEAVES THE TRUE ANTI-SATANIC- VATICANIST/ROMAN-"CATHOLIC"-CULTIC, CONSTITUTIONAL/CONSERVATIVE & THE TRUE AMERICAN PEOPLE'S POPULIST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: U.S. CONGRESSMAN & HONORABLE MR. RON PAUL ! !
but now he supports hucabee and calls me a Covert Satanic- Vaticanist/Roman-"Catholic"-Cultic Sympathizer
whatever that is
just having fun while trying to make a point that christians don't bash people
and im not saying what savedbygrace said is true or not