|
|
USER COMMENTS BY DOPEY |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 11 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
9/30/14 10:17 AM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Ricky Nelson, was a tragic figure something akin to a key character in a William Shakespeare tragedy. Nelson had movie star looks making him extremely attractive to women and the envy of many a man. Ricky Nelson was a star for many years on his parents tv show "The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet" and show cased his numerous songs on that program thus helping him to become a major rock star of that era. In one music poll I read about, Ricky Nelson beat out Elvis Presley for the #1 position of favorite male singer. Nelson had numerous hit records, lots of women, lots of money and then it all fell apart for him. He got married to Sharon and chose to spend a lot of his money on drugs for him and his wife. Some of the stories I read about his wife while they were both living the "high" life defy adequate description. Eventually she woke up and detached herself from the "high" life they had spent together. Unfortunately Ricky Nelson never did and he with his new "squeeze" Helen died in a fiery plane crash on December 31st 1985 on a plane once owned by Jerry Lee Lewis, Jerry appropriately named, it seems, "the killer". [URL=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2ssbgThljU]]] What was yet what might have been[/URL] (see 7:50 AM - No, Ricky Nelson never did get in my taxi. |
|
|
9/30/14 9:06 AM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Morning, September 30 (Morning and Evening: Daily Readings)“Sing forth the honour of his name, make his praise glorious.” Psalm 66:2 It is not left to our own option whether we shall praise God or not. Praise is God’s most righteous due, and every Christian, as the recipient of his grace, is bound to praise God from day to day. It is true we have no authoritative rubric for daily praise; we have no commandment prescribing certain hours of song and thanksgiving: but the law written upon the heart teaches us that it is right to praise God; and the unwritten mandate comes to us with as much force as if it had been recorded on the tables of stone, or handed to us from the top of thundering Sinai. Yes, it is the Christian’s duty to praise God. It is not only a pleasurable exercise, but it is the absolute obligation of his life. Think not ye who are always mourning, that ye are guiltless in this respect, or imagine that ye can discharge your duty to your God without songs of praise. [URL=http://www.spurgeon.org/morn_eve/this_morning.cgi]]] You are bound by the bonds of his love...[/URL] |
|
|
9/30/14 7:50 AM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
I was saved in my late 20's having never been exposed to the gospel prievious to that time. I had grown up exposed musically to the rock era when the main stars were people such as Brenda Lee, Connie Francis, Pat Boone, Elvis Presley, Ricky Nelson, the Everly Brothers, Buddy Holly, Chuck Berry, Fats Domino etc. Every singer I have mentioned I liked to a degree and they produced records some of which I liked very much. If I had to pick my favourite rock song from that era it would probably be Ricky Nelson's, Poor Little Fool. [URL=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmASthKcsA4]]] Poor Little Fool[/URL] was Nelson's first #1 record and reached that position in August 1958. Looking Back on that song and the singer who sang it from today's perspective I sometimes sadly think the title probably ended up being a perfect statement about the singer himself. One of various jobs in my life was taxi cab driver. I recall decades ago sitting in cab stand late at night approximately 200 feet from a night club in which Ricky Nelson was giving a live performance. I realized because of circumstances too involved to detail here that there was an extremely good chance that my next cab fare was going to be Ricky Nelson... More... |
|
|
9/29/14 4:45 PM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Clarke Kent wrote: Doesn't Paul say in his first letter to the Corinthians, chapter 6 talk about it is shameful for Christians to take each other to court, that they need to settle their conflicts in the church? That makes you wonder whether the Calvary Chapel is really a church at all, but just another denomination, sorry, I mean business enterprise. Clarke, it turns out you are right:1 Corinthians 6:1 KJV Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? The next seven verses amplify the first verse even further. BTW how is Lois Lane? |
|
|
9/29/14 3:02 PM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Frank thank you for leading me out of my blindness I see that I was correct in regard to my memory concerning Dolores and I will now confess to somethings I was reluctant to admit because of possibly being embarrassed. I thought you were one of the 4 but I wasn't absolutely certain. While I was trying to cure my own blindness a post from GSTexas came up and I thought GSTexas was one of the four but I wasn't absolutely certain. The fourth person I did not recall at all and my apologies to the fourth person for that fact. I now see that I partially answered "how the Lord answered our prayers" but more is required. I had a convergence of three things happen that greatly affected my mind, was extremely painful, and convinced me I was possibly about to die and that Satan was involved in bringing these things together at the exact same time. At some level of understanding I don't totally comprehend I thought that if I'm about to go out into eternity I'm going to try to go out doing one last thing correctly. Some of the results of the 4 people praying for me, I know about, were that I haven't died yet, I still have the three extremely troubling things present with me and my endurance level has gone up significantly but is not perfect. |
|
|
9/29/14 2:12 PM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Frank, or anyone else, if Frank does not/cannot respond in a reasonable time, I need some help. What I need is a link/links to the exact thread/threads you are quoting from so that anyone that clicks on that link/links can see for themselves in totality exactly what I said.I know from memory that you are quoting me precisely but I need to see the thread that all my words occur in and it may be beneficial to other people also. At the moment God has me totally blind to what ever else I said, in that thread/threads that you are not quoting from me. I've already stated what you quote from me is according to my memory precisely accurate. Shane, I consider it theoretically possible that the answer to your question that ends "God and his mercy?" is yes. But I also consider it probable that the correct answer is no. You have bridged love and mercy in relationship to God. I think the correct answer may involve bridging love mercy and judgement to God, thus, eventually we may have to go deeper in the considerations that are going on in this thread. |
|
|
9/29/14 10:44 AM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Shane wrote: Is it not better to suffer wrong than to enter suit among non believers? Consider the ravens... they neither sow nor reap, yet your father feeds them. How much more are you worth? Shane thank you for your thoughtful reply. "Consider the ravens". Yes my father feeds them and He also uses them to feed a saved person through them, (ravens feeding Elijah).The ravens are clearly used by the Holy Spirit in Scripture, as well as sparrows, as a metaphor for unsaved people. Knowing I am saved, I conclude I am worth a lot "more" to God than a collection of unsaved people. However, I also know that God is concerned in love for unsaved people (John 3:16). So your admonition brings out a deeper thing to consider: Can a lawsuit against unsaved people demonstrate the love of God for unsaved people? |
|
|
9/29/14 8:29 AM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
To sue or not to sue? That is the question. I find the topic of this thread very timely indeed for I have been seriously considering initiating a lawsuit since last week. Bringing a lawsuit against someone or something is a very serious matter indeed in the eyes of God for there are very many spiritual principles involved in the introduction of such a lawsuit. There is the potential for a lot of people to get hurt in the introduction of a lawsuit, as well the potential of getting God very angry in regard to the entity being sued and/or the entity doing the suing. |
|
|
9/29/14 6:03 AM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Judges 13:17-18 KJV And Manoah said unto the angel of the LORD, What is thy name, that when thy sayings come to pass we may do thee honour? And the angel of the LORD said unto him, Why askest thou thus after my name, seeing it is secret? Manoah sought a name so that a particular someone could be honoured. But the particular someone understood something Manoah didn't: God didn't count it a season for honouring a particular somone by name so the name was kept secret. God uses various spiritual principles concering name asking and revealing vs not revealing. The one asked to reveal a name shouldn't be in any big hurry to reveal or not reveal until he or she has considered what God wants in regard to the particular situation involved: What man wants and what God wants are often opposites. |
|
|
9/29/14 4:52 AM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
1 Kings 18:7-8 KJV And as Obadiah was in the way, behold, Elijah met him: and he knew him, and fell on his face, and said, Art thou that my lord Elijah? And he answered him, I am: go, tell thy lord, Behold, Elijah is here. In the quoted passage Elijah is directly asked if he is Elijah to which Elijah replies "I am". 1 Kings 18:7-8 equals an opposite season to Matthew 11:2-6 in that the 1 Kings passage in a season of time involves a person plainly and directly answering a question in regards to the question of who he is. While the Matthew 11:2-6 passage on the other hand, in a different season of time, rejects a direct plain answer in order to get a person through the hearing of deeds to conclude the answer to the same basic question of are you a particular person. There is an opposite season to the season just illustrated: the season for keeping a name totally secret:... More... |
|
|
9/28/14 9:24 PM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Ecclesiastes 3:1 KJV To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: Our text indicates there is a season for every thing that happens. Our text is amplified by following verses from that chapter: 2. A time to be born a time to die; a time to plant and time to pluck up. Notice how the first two examples of things occurring in different seasons are opposites of each other. That pattern continues in the following different seasons things: 3. A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; 4. A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance; 5. A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing; 6. A time to get, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away; At 9/28/14 2:13 PM, I gave Scripture, Matthew 11:2-6, which illustrates a season for drawing one's own conclusion about a person's identification through observing what a person says and does. There are opposite seasons to the season illustrated in Matthew 11:26. We will consider a couple of them... More... |
|
|
9/28/14 2:13 PM |
Dopey | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Christopher000 wrote: Sleeping beauty...Dopey, is that you? : ) Christopher000, my dear friend As you are no doubt aware Dopey is a moniker I use frequently. I once in a while, use another moniker in the same way in principle that I use Dopey, that is, I endeavor to give glory to God through a moniker seldom used as I do when using my main primary moniker of Dopey. In matthew 11:2-6, a certain man wanted to know if another man equaled a certain other person. The answer the first man received back, in essence, equaled: draw your own conclusion from things you see the man doing who you are, in effect, questioning in regard to equaling the same person or another person. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|