|
|
USER COMMENTS BY CEZAR |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 11 · Found: 466 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
9/2/10 2:39 PM |
Cezar | | Midwest | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Wait what? "Reverend" Rachel Mann! I guess she hasn't received the memo she is not allowed to be behind the pulpit. “liberative theology of darkness” She has to be joking... It's called rebellion. "She says that by contrast, churchgoers can appear too sincere and take themselves too seriously." Too sincere? What's wrong with being serious about God? The way Rachel Mann "thinks" is one reason God told females to be subject to their husbands. |
|
|
9/2/10 2:31 PM |
Cezar | | Midwest | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Of course. But, the environmental nut that took hostages at the Discovery Channel wasn't called a terrorist. Environmentalist are terrorist. We can't build churches in Muslim countries, they shouldn't be able to build their Mosques here. They need to get the hint they are not welcomed in America and go home. If someone wants to argue that they have "rights" lets talk about the Branch Davidians and all the lies that were told about them and then they were murdered. They should have been left alone. |
|
|
9/1/10 5:25 PM |
Cezar | | Midwest | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Dufus wrote: Leave the cameras. Take down the Traffic Lights. That will keep people from slamming on their breaks. No, take down the cameras. |
|
|
8/7/10 3:57 PM |
Cezar | | Midwest | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
""[Petitioners] are self-described born-again Christians who adhere to a literal interpretation of the Bible and have little sympathy with the secular world," she wrote." Why should we? Kagan doesn't have any comsideration for the Constitution or Bill of Rights. She has to go. I pray God does something to make that happen. "This burden on religious freedom is slight, and the interest of the state is great." Slight? The interest of the state should be the interests of the people. It is "We the people", not "We the politicians." [URL=http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=187133]]]Kagan's own notes blasted homeschoolers[/URL] Kagan advised Powell during the 1980s when a court case developed in Ohio in which a Christian family decided to homeschool their child. The parents were convicted of not getting the superintendent's permission, and the case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, whose justices refused to intervene. Where is the law telling us we have to have permission? Parents are to educate their own children. |
|
|
8/5/10 11:52 AM |
Cezar | | Midwest | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
"I quit being a Christian. I'm out. In the name of Christ, I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life. In the name of ...Christ, I quit Christianity and being Christian. Amen." ...All of those things are anti-Christian. Secular humanism is against humanity It is not a philosophy that espouses reason, ethics, and justice, it is a cult that rejects Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour. It puts mankind in His place. We are not "gods" and we will never be "gods." [URL=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWUVKUDvs_g]]]William Cooper - "The Humanist Police" (1 of 6)[/URL] Jack McLamb's "Aid & Abet" Newsletter Jack McLamb is a plant and a secular humanist. millercl wrote: Neither is the belief that KJV is the only word of God. The KJV is the Authorized Word of God for today. Like it or not. |
|
|
8/3/10 3:29 PM |
Cezar | | Midwest | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
The American post office needs a series of special stamps commemorating the KJV. Rejecting the NASB by Dr. Frank Logsdon "Dr. Frank Logsdon was the co-founder of the New American Standard Bible (NASB). He has since renounced any connection to it [Quoting Dr. Logsdon] “I must under God renounce every attachment to the New American Standard Version. I’m afraid I’m in trouble with the Lord… We laid the groundwork; I wrote the format; I helped interview some of the translators; I sat with the translator; I wrote the preface… I’m in trouble; I can’t refute these arguments; its wrong, terribly wrong… The deletions are absolutely frightening… there are so many… Are we so naive that we do not suspect Satanic deception in all of this? Upon investigation, I wrote my dear friend, Mr. Lockman, (editors note: Mr. Lockman was the benefactor through which the NASB was published) explaining that I was forced to renounce all attachment to the NASV (editors note: This is the same as the NASB). You can say that the Authorized Version (KJV) is absolutely correct. How correct? 100% correct…” [Dr. Frank Logsdon] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|