|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ B. WARELY ” |
|
|
| Page 1 | Page 10 · Found: 421 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 8/31/16 3:10 PM |
| B. Warely | |  |  |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Reformed theology! Don't worry Jim! I will not be debating the differences between the Baptist Non-Covenantal mode of baptism again on this thread. Last time I did the Baptists got all nasty and ran away from the debate. Since then they haven't spoken to me. I guess they are afraid I'll prove the Scriptural-Covenantal mode again. However it is an interesting connection to note that the Dispensational penchant to relegate parts of the Bible to history and disconnect it from the church; - And the Baptist penchant to do the same thing to the OT and Covenant of Grace. Do you think there is a 'link' between these two anomalies??? |
|
|
| 8/31/16 2:46 PM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Dispensational Theology Jim: It's amazing the Baptists are now - again? - trying to validate their mode of baptism which was invented in 1521 by a bunch of heretics called the Anabaptists. Thus trying to CHANGE the Bible and exclude the Covenantal parents from Biblical Covenant doctrine as perceived in the Scriptures. Never mind reject the covenantal children from God's Covenant of Grace precepts. A few days ago I was accused of not putting enough Biblical references in my posts on the subject of Dispensationalism. Which seems very strange since the Dispensational ideology - UNBiblical as it is - Was founded upon two human beings and their ideas. The first as we all know was Margaret MacDonald in the 1830's or thereabouts, who apparently had a couple of visions which were used to begin the Dispy ideology. The ramblings of this poor misguided young lady were taken up by Darby and co to fabricate a new theory which was 'nailed' into the Bible, by human hands. Following this was the adulterous jailbird Scofield who elaborated this idea and wrote his own version of the Bible to establish the Arminian Dispensational religion. Amazing isn't it Jim? If not Anabaptists it is Plymouth Brethren ideologies!!! |
|
|
| 8/30/16 3:40 PM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Theology Ah Jim; What you need is ....."Christ described the future state of glory in terms of the redeemed "taking their place at the feast with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 8:11). These passages of Scripture make it clear that the promises of God, covenantally given to Abraham, that he would be the God of Abraham and of his (spiritual) descendants after him forever (Gen. 17:7-8) extend temporally to the farthest reaches of the future and include within their compass the entire community of the redeemed. This is just to say that the Abrahamic covenant, in the specific prospect it holds forth of the salvation of the entire church of God, is identical with the soteric program of the covenant of grace, indeed, is identical with the covenant of grace itself. It also means specifically that the blessings of the covenant of grace which believers enjoy today under the sanctions of the New Testament economy are founded upon the covenant which God made with Abraham. Said another way, the "new covenant" itself is simply the administrative "extension and unfolding of the Abrahamic covenant." (Robert L.Reymond)
https://www.monergism.com/five-arguments-unity-covenant-grace |
|
|
| 8/30/16 11:18 AM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
""If senior leaders of the Church of England water down the teaching of the Church of England on key issues like homosexuality, then this synod could easily evolve in to a new Anglican jurisdiction in England."There already is OTHER Church of England groups in England and the USA. These moved out of the main CofE when women were ordained. It is good to hear that some of the people are paying attention to the heretical errors and reacting to them. Quote:
"The Church of England (Continuing) was formed in 1994, soon after the Anglican Church began to ordain women. It is now thought to have about 300 members in five congregations.
It is one of dozens of Anglican congregations outside the mainstream Church of England which have no formal relationship with the Archbishop of Canterbury.
They exist mostly in the US and the UK, and claim to be 'continuing' the old traditions. The Church (Continuing) is founded on:
• the Authorised Version of the Bible,
• the Book of Common Prayer 1662,
• and the 39 Articles of Religion." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4059267.stm ----- Oh! And there is the 'Free Church of England.'
http://fcofe.org.uk/ |
|
|
| 8/30/16 5:25 AM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
dispensational beliefs. That's a pity Jim; Since that theory seems to be doing Satan's work of invalidating the unity of Scripture."In answer to the question, whether God is then so fickle-minded that He must change His will as regards man seven times, Frank E. Gaebelein replies: “It is not God who has vacillated. Though there are seven dispensations, they are all one in principle, being throughout based upon the single test of obedience. And had man been found able to keep the conditions laid down by the first dispensation, the other six would have been unnecessary. But man failed. Yet, instead of casting off His guilty creature, God was moved with compassion, and gave him a fresh trial under new conditions. Thus each dispensation ends with failure, and each dispensation shows forth God’s mercy.”[Exploring the Bible, p95] There are serious objections to this view. (a) The word “dispensation” (oikonomia), which is a Scriptural term (cf. Luke 16:2-4; ICor 9:17; Eph 1:10; 3:2.9; Col 1:25; I Tim 1:4) is here used in an un-Scriptural sense. It denotes a stewardship, an arrangement, or an administration, but never a testing time or a time of probation. (b) The distinctions are clearly quite arbitrary." (Louis Berkhof) |
|
|
| 8/29/16 3:19 PM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
six-part sermon I hope you will, by His grace, begin to see the continuity of Scripture and the Covenant of Grace soon, Jim."While defending himself before Agrippa, Paul testified that he was standing trial only because of his teaching concerning "the hope of the promise made by God to our fathers, to which our twelve tribes hope to attain as they earnestly serve God day and night, concerning which hope I am being accused by the Jews" (Acts 26:627). He then explained what he meant by Israel’s hope by declaring that throughout his long missionary ministry of some thirty years he had never said anything "beyond what the prophets and Moses said would happen—that the Messiah would suffer and, as the first to rise from the dead, would proclaim light to his own people and to the Gentiles" (Acts 26:22-23). From these verses it is clear that Paul believed that the Old Testament hope to which Moses and the prophets witnessed was the Messiah’s death, resurrection, and saving ministrations, which "light" the Messiah himself would proclaim both directly and through his apostles to the Jewish people and to the Gentiles (see Eph. 2:17; 4:21)." (R.Reymond)
https://www.monergism.com/five-arguments-unity-covenant-grace |
|
|
| 8/29/16 2:57 PM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Good article go read it. 
If you really get good at gardening think of all the veggies you can give your neighbors  By the way, if you hate gardening there are other types of exercise you can do.
Oh, by the way, exercise helps with type II diabetes, [URL=http://www.webmd.com/diabetes/type-2-diabetes-guide/exercise-guidelines]]]http://tinyurl.com/hyenhsp (11 Exercise Tips for Type 2 Diabetes)[/URL] Jim: Isn't it very revealing that the geniuses are recommending we turn back the clocks of history and do more manual labour to remain healthy. Man was obviously not supposed to sit at a desk and live the sedentary lives we do today. |
|
|
| 8/28/16 4:04 PM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
All the Dispensations has this outline which in itself explains something of Dispensational theology. "dispensationalism has two methods of salvation. For example, Scofield’s footnote to Romans 7:56 speaks of "two methods of divine dealing, one through the law, the other through the Holy Spirit." Now, Paul before his conversion may have had a wrong conception of the Mosaic law, but this does not mean that in reality the Holy Spirit was inoperative in the Old Testament. Similarly the footnote to John 1:17, "Grace … is constantly set in contrast to law, under which God demands righteousness from man." But God still demands righteousness from man, though this righteousness is a gift from God. The righteousness by which an Old Testament saint was saved was also a divine gift. Therefore Scofield is quite wrong in the following footnote, which says, "As a dispensation grace begins with the death and resurrection of Christ. The point of testing is no longer legal obedience as the condition of salvation." But the dispensation of grace did not begin with the crucifixion. God began dispensing grace to Adam."
http://www.trinityfoundation.org/PDF/The%20Trinity%20Review%200011a%20Dispensationalism.pdf |
|
|
| 8/28/16 3:44 PM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote:
the dispensation of Human Government "Omitting Some Scriptures from the Church’s Use Some Dispensationalists do not go quite so far as others in arbitrarily erecting notice-boards over large sections of Scripture, warning Christians not to tread on ground that belongs to others, yet there is general agreement among them that the Gospel of Matthew—though it stands at the beginning of the New Testament and not at the close of the Old!—pertains not to those who are members of the mystical body of Christ, but is “entirely Jewish,” that the Sermon on the Mount is “legalistic” and not evangelistic, and that its searching and flesh-withering precepts are not binding upon Christians. Some go so far as to insist that the Great Commission, with which it closes (Mat 28:19), is not designed for us today, but is meant for “a godly Jewish remnant” after the present era is ended. In support of this wild and wicked theory, appeal is made to and great stress laid upon the fact that Christ is represented, most prominently, as “the son of David” or King of the Jews; but they ignore another conspicuous fact, namely that in its opening verse the Lord Jesus is set forth as “the son of Abraham,” and he was a Gentile!" (A.W.Pink) |
|
|
| 8/28/16 3:19 PM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
""a North Carolina school district's transgender guidelines, which would bar teachers from calling their students "boys and girls.""To the mindless Liberals introducing this kind of lunacy and helping to turn our world into a ridiculous moronic and absurd hell ..... "Yea, in heart ye work wickedness; ye weigh the violence of your hands in the earth. 3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. 4 Their poison is like the poison of a serpent: they are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear; 5 Which will not hearken to the voice of charmers, charming never so wisely. 6 Break their teeth, O God, in their mouth: break out the great teeth of the young lions, O LORD. 7 Let them melt away as waters which run continually: when he bendeth his bow to shoot his arrows, let them be as cut in pieces. 8 As a snail which melteth, let every one of them pass away: like the untimely birth of a woman, that they may not see the sun." Psalm 58:2ff |
|
|
| 8/27/16 5:40 PM |
| B. Warely | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
"Karl Marx believed that the problem with the socialism of his day was that it did not deal with economic issues. He proposed that his new (communist) economic system, which called for redistribution of wealth, was more equitable. But it is clear that this system does not work either, at least in part because it requires people to be altruistic. Unfortunately, working for the benefit of others over the self is not in harmony with the current state of human nature. Marx advanced a secular solution to what is a spiritual problem. But by its very nature, a spiritual problem can be solved only at a spiritual level." (Wilf Hey)"RE"-Distribution? - Of what *GOD* provides....
Acts 20:35 - I have shewed you all things, how that so labouring ye ought to support the weak, and to remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he said, It is more blessed to give than to receive. Luke 6:38 - Give, and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, and shaken together, and running over, shall men give into your bosom. For with the same measure that ye mete withal it shall be measured to you again. Prov 19:17 - He that hath pity upon the poor lendeth unto the LORD; and that which he hath given will he pay him again. 2 Cor 9:7 - for God loveth a cheerful giver. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
