Cezar wrote:
I have to agree with "You Know Who."
This site has been removing good preachers and speakers for no reason and no reason for their removal is given.

Too many more people removed and I will have to leave. I would hope the rest of you would protest as well.

You agree with "You Know Who."

Sermon Audio has very few rules concerning posting which include:

» No profanities including crude or rude language.

» Personal attacks or insults directed at other users will be censored.

» Only one post at a time per thread (allow for alternate users).

» No cross-posting or spamming (do not copy your posts everywhere).

Bob wrote:
Agree with you...but there are also fewer and fewer "true women". It can be quite difficult on a young man today when he begins to learn of his roles and try to take up leadership only to be shot down by the women in his life.

John UK wrote:
Is that when "all" means all, or just some.

Mike wrote:
Depends on whether the meaning has been reformed or not.

John UK wrote:
...if I read you right, you refer to something far more simple, like obeying God in every detail, such as the scripture bro Lurker just mentioned. Being fallen creatures remade, it would be easy to neglect simple instruction, and end up in trouble, even danger, after which we may seek to obey even though late. Far better to take God at his word, believe his word is for our good and eternal felicity, and obey it right from the very beginning. Proverbs is great for instruction like that.

Is that it?

Alan H wrote:
John UK,
At what point in time do we begin making decisions in our lives based upon the Scriptures?

1) At the very beginning?

2) When we perceive danger?

3) When we fall into trouble?

John UK wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the question Alan.

addon wrote:
Or even
4) When the Holy Spirit enables the sinner so to do!!!

John UK wrote:
David.....

...Our only blueprint for faith and practice is found in the Bible, so maybe you could help Lurker find some biblical warrant for your comments.

At what point in time do we begin making decisions in our lives based upon the Scriptures?

1) At the very beginning?

2) When we perceive danger?

3) When we fall into trouble?

Being unequally yoked is OK then?

I am astonished Might we not then join the pope in a rally for a good cause?

2Co 6:14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?

2Co 6:15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?

2Co 6:16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and [walk] in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

2Co 6:17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean [thing]; and I will receive you,

2Co 6:18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.

Have you forgotten that the Mormon church uses good works to lure careless men into their fold? Don't be fooled by the light...

2Co 11:14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

John UK on 9/3/10 11:13 AM wrote:
I am astonished

Joe the Protestant to Lurker wrote:
Initialy I was in agreement with you on this issue. (I'm not in favor of the Strain at a gnat mentality either) However, upon reading more transcrips of the meeting, Beck did do quite a bit of preaching. And it did contain clear Mormon teaching such as; The American Indians being to chosen people of God, and God sending someone in the last days to save the American Constutution. That part is a Mormon prophecy.

Yes, maybee some folks are over reacting without knowing all the facts. But maybee some are under reacting without knowing all the facts.

Lurker wrote:
I've endorsed Beck? Quote me.

Lurker wrote:
Beck is a conservative talk show host. That's how he was presented in this news article and that's the perspective from which I have commented.

Lurker wrote:
John,
Perhaps someone who attended this rally will pick up a bible and start reading at 1 Cor 13 which will eventually lead to their salvation.

Do you suppose Jesus Christ would have endorsed Glenn Beck, as you have done? He said:

Mt 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

Mt 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

Mt 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

Mt 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

Mt 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

Mt 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

But you, Lurker, know Glenn Beck is a false prophet and a bad tree and yet you would encourage others to eat that fruit. Whose side are you on?

John UK wrote:
No comment.

Well, maybe a little raspberry

My thoughts exactly! Thanks for being honest!

To all who see nothing wrong with this affair:

I am sad to see that there seems to be an allowance and tolerance due to the political ends, as if the end justifies the means. Look in the Old Testament and you'll see that this kind of alliance always ends in disaster. It forebodes terrible ill for us if we willingly (or rather willfully) submit ourselves under the authority and influence of those who are themselves in rebellion against God.

2Jo 1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into [your] house, neither bid him God speed:

2Jo 1:11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

But thou wilt say, "It's only a Tea Party!" "It's just political!" "Oh, just ignore the Gospel songs and the other references to God."

You can't justify what God condemns. To do so reveals a rebellious spirit...

John UK wrote:
...the Authorized (King James) Version has always been a safeguard against doctrinal error, and preserved the BIBLICAL Calvinistic Theology intact for centuries since The Reformation.

Jim Lincoln wrote:
...the argument has been won by conservative Christians who have moved ahead to the NIV, NKJV, NASB, etc. and are removing all traces of the AV from their churches.

Take a fresh look at this survey:
[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/survey_details.asp?voteid=le920803054]]]What Bible Version Do You Use?[/URL]

Foyden wrote:
"The Almighty Bible isn’t a traditional book - it is a graphic novel that is also coming out as an application with narration, pop up maps and interactivity."

Liberalism for the kids of Liberals.

We have seen hard copy of this direction before such as the "Life Application bible for students" etc.

Regardless of book, comic and graphic production - The Holy Spirit will lead the Elect to the TRUE Word of God, and away from Liberalism. Thanks be to God.

The church needs a Reformation from Liberalism just as it did for the popish heresy.

Mike wrote:
Don't blame Jim if the same old bait he uses gets the fish to bite. If a fisherman uses a bait which doesn't get any nibbles, will he not cease to use it?

It is very offensive to me that we are constantly inundated with the topic below, no matter where we go. Is there nothing that can be done about it? There is another thread where the topic is being fully covered...

Jim Lincoln wrote:
Yes, teenagers could be turned off by such outdated Bibles such as the Anglican Version, q.v., [URL=http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=665]]]Why I Do Not Think the King James Bible Is the Best Translation Available Today[/URL]. If they have to sudy AV in school it the bible will appear dead, which it isn't.

DavidD1960 wrote:
How do you Ladies/Gentlemen feel about the subject of marking in the Bible? (e.g.underlining,highlighting,writing notes in the margins,etc.) Any and all answers will be appreciated.
BTW I posted here because this seems to be the most active thread.

God doesn't condemn the legitimate use, but only the abuse of His word. I have a couple of Bibles which I had marked in various ways, which I had to retire. I had to set them aside because the backs were broken through much use. He is more careless who strives to protect the paper and ink than he who diligently studies to learn the truth which it contains, using those means you mentioned. Cross nothing out like some unbelievers do and you'll do just fine...

Think about it this way. What if someone were to find a Bible and open it up to see if they could find something indicating the owner. What would they find?

If they found every page clean they might think, "This Bible belongs to someone who doesn't read it." If they found words crossed out, they might think "This Bible is someone's who doesn't believe it." But if they find it marked up, they would very likely think "This is someone's who studies their Bible, perhaps a preacher or a teacher."

Jim Lincoln wrote:
The AV translators of the AV would have approved of the NKJV.