Sign in or signup
Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream

My Favorite Things
Events | Local | Blogs
New Audio | Video | Clips
Church Finder
Live Webcasts
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -3 sec
Top Sermons
Daily Log
Online Bible
Daily Reading
Our Services
Sermon DashboardNEW
Members Only

Breaking News Home | All | Religion | Society | Tech | Choice | SA Newsroom
FRONT PAGE  |  2/29/2020
SUNDAY, AUG 11, 2019  |  21 comments
Fired Deputy Cites Billy Graham Rule as Reason for Firing
In a federal lawsuit filed last week, former North Carolina sheriff’s deputy Manuel Torres says he was fired while trying to practice his Christian faith. Torres, 51, says the Lee County Sheriff’s Office terminated his employment because he refused to train a woman—a task, the suit states, that would have involved spending “significant amounts of time alone in his patrol car with the female officer trainee.”

According to the lawsuit, filed July 31 in U.S. District Court, “Torres holds the strong and sincere religious belief that the Holy Bible prohibits him, as a married man, from being alone for extended periods with a female who is not his wife.” Training a female deputy “violates [Torres’] religious beliefs” and leaves “the appearance of sinful conduct on his part,” it adds.

Torres, who has served as a deacon at East Sanford Baptist Church in Sanford, North Carolina, says he adheres to the ...

CLICK HERE to Read Entire Article

   02/22/20  |  Trump admin. creates new advisory board to expose research using... • 35 comments
   02/22/20  |  Transgenderism Grows by 1,500% Among Swedish Children • 1 comments
   02/11/20  |  No Room for Pro-Lifers in Democratic Party, Sanders Says:... • 37 comments
   02/11/20  |  Teacher Forces 7th Graders To Do Trans Homework • 16 comments
   02/09/20  |  Franklin Graham banned in Britain! • 70 comments
   01/21/20  |  SermonAudio Tip: Internationalization, Reaching the World! • 4 comments
   01/03/20  |  2019 Foundations Conference Followup Report • 6 comments
   12/30/19  |  SermonAudio Tip: Second: Pearl Mountain Coffee, 100% Profits to... • 4 comments
   12/06/19  |  SermonAudio Tip: Revamped MyChurch App for All Broadcasters! • 3 comments
   11/11/19  |  SermonAudio Tip: Player Keyboard Shortcuts, Playback Speeds • 2 comments
COMMENTS | show all | add new  
    Sorting Order:  
· Page 1 ·  Found: 21 user comment(s)
News Item8/13/19 1:57 PM
Frank  Contact via emailFind all comments by Frank
His department also provided “false and negative referrals” to other law enforcement agencies, Torres says, preventing him from securing employment elsewhere. He’s suing for $300,000 in compensatory damages and $15,000 in punitive damages, saying he suffered “loss of income and benefits, loss of quality and enjoyment of life, [and] loss ofreputation.”

Above is of course from the article.

Well, I think it is safe to say that few professing believers would be put into a spot for the above to be a reality.

JAG, your point was very good, thank you. If women weren’t allowed to be in patrol cars, then this wouldn’t have even become an issue. As I have often said; culture is defining scripture instead of the other way around.


News Item8/13/19 11:27 AM
Just a Guy | Mississippi  Find all comments by Just a Guy
Thanks for book...I mean explanation Chris000. I really appreciate it 👍

I see your point well. Especially now that we're nearing almost half a century of women and men working in close contact in the workforce...

Your valid point is that he wasn't asked to do anything sinful or wrong. So the biggest problem here, is not that he was told to do something out of the ordinary or sinful, but that this women is in the workforce. The underlying issue it that women have not been given the authority to work under other men under most circumstances...

Once again, thanks for the explanation. I am sure that took you a moment to type...


News Item8/13/19 7:50 AM
Christopher000 | Rhode Island  Find all comments by Christopher000
...when the task is completely innocent, and a normal part of a job, in every respect?

I just think his expectations were unreasonable as an employee, and that the department had no responsibility to cator to him while refusing direct orders, based upon a matter of personal conscience that wouldn't have, directly, caused him to be in disobediance; putting man above God.

While I salute him, on a personal level, he was expected to do the job he applied for, was hired for, was being paid to do, and a job where he knew how things worked. He wasn't asked to do anything unusual, out of the ordinary, or wicked. Again, how far does an employer's responsibility go on such subjective matters where what's wrong for one, is right for another, and both are perfectly right?

Sorry JaG and Herbal Mama...but, you asked.😊


News Item8/13/19 7:50 AM
Christopher000 | Rhode Island  Find all comments by Christopher000
...Nothing sinister, nothing inappropriate, nothing weird about it, out of the ordinary, or out of whack...just patrolling the streets, responding to calls, and training.

My issue, JaG and Herbal Mama, isn't the deputy rolling with what he thought was right for him. I give him high praises for that, and admire his strength and conviction. I think he's a great example for all, and think his wife is fortunate to have such an honorable husband who clearly loves her, but more importantly, loves The Lord, and strives for obediance. My issue is the fact that he's expecting the department to conform, and change-up the way things are done, according to any matters of personal conscience he happens to have, whenever he happens to have them. He's made demands, and refused orders in the past, based upon his conscience. My question is, what is the department's responsibility to an employee who refuses to take orders, citing that it's a violation of his religious beliefs, but based upon nothing but a matter of his own personal conscience? How long can any employer cator to subjective violations of one's faith, and allow an employee to refuse to perform the responsibilities they're being paid to do, based solely upon how a task might cause a person to feel, or look to another, etc.,


News Item8/13/19 7:47 AM
Christopher000 | Rhode Island  Find all comments by Christopher000
...This man would have been absolutely in the right, as well, and not in disobediance, even though the two men made polar opposite decisions, and that's the conundrum in this case...refusing to perform a task that you're being paid, and ordered to do, when the task isn't violating any clear rules or commands we're expected to adhere to as Christians; when the task doesn't call for us to put man above God; causing clear comprimise or sin.

The deputy made a personal judgement call, for personal reasons. Maybe he didn't want to risk inappropriate thoughts, or cause his wife's mind to wander, who knows. However, we're talking about patrolling the streets in a car, with two people sitting in their own seats, and separated by a wide console. They weren't going to be on long stakeouts, alone together in some apartment. They weren't going to be staying in hotels together, or going on any overnight business trips. They weren't going to be using the same locker room, or expected to behave as husband and wife as their cover while investigating some case. They were going to be riding in a car together, and that's it.


News Item8/13/19 7:44 AM
Christopher000 | Rhode Island  Find all comments by Christopher000
Good morning, JaG and Herbal Mama, okay, since you both asked so nicely, here it is:

In my initial comment, I hesitated to even use the phrase, "matter of conscience", but technically, that's exactly what it is, and Frank was nice enough to post the related scripture up.

While we are to obey God above any man, or manmade law, I consider matters of conscience to be very subjective; unique from person to person, and not clear, scriptural violations; sin. Matters of conscience are things that we, personally, don't feel comfortable with or about, or that we're just not quite certain about, so yes, we should err on the side of caution, doing what we feel is right, as we see it. However, one man's conscience is not anothers, and in both cases, strangely, most often than not, both are right, and neither is wrong, because they're subjective situations.

Now in the deputys case, he was exercising his personal right as he analyzed a situation, and decided that, for him, it was a situation that he needed to avoid, as a matter of obediance. Good for him. Maybe he didn't want to risk any inappropriate thoughts. Now, the next born again man in line may have seen absolutely nothing wrong with alone time in a car, doing the job he was being paid to do, and training a female deputy.


News Item8/12/19 8:16 PM
Herbal Mama  Find all comments by Herbal Mama

News Item8/12/19 6:32 PM
Christopher000 | Rhode Island  Find all comments by Christopher000
Oops, sorry JaG, and HM, by saying that, I didn't mean I thought that either one of you was looking for an argument. I meant that my own personal perspective shouldn't be turned into a heated debate by anyone at all, because I can see both sides. I just lean a bit stronger one way at the moment.

News Item8/12/19 5:18 PM
Herbal Mama  Find all comments by Herbal Mama
Christopher, I'm not looking to argue, just wanted to clarify. I completely understand your reluctance. SA can get quite heated and easily make a person weary. Best of wishes.

News Item8/12/19 5:00 PM
Just a Guy | Mississippi  Find all comments by Just a Guy
Chris000 says
don't consider this topic one to argue over,"

I agree...

I am personally not an Argument Guy (I prefer to be "Just a Guy). My reason for asking is that anyone who believes in something does a much better job of articulating that belief than the one who doesn't see it the same way...

I have learned just as much hearing about other peoples opinions on things, as hearing someone talk about a belief I hold myself...


News Item8/12/19 4:52 PM
Christopher000 | Rhode Island  Find all comments by Christopher000
Thanks Frank.

JaG and Herbal Mama, maybe I'll post up my personal perspective in the AM. I don't consider this topic one to argue over, but maybe I'll post up what all came to mind for me after reading it, just for the different take.


News Item8/12/19 1:46 PM
Herbal Mama  Find all comments by Herbal Mama
In my old town the police department had to fire a bunch of cops for having inappropriate relationships in the car while on duty. I can understand why this office desires not to place himself in such a position. Let's not forget that recently a public official was to be thrown under the bus based on he said she said stuff.

Christopher, I too, am curious as to your thoughts.


News Item8/12/19 11:51 AM
Frank  Contact via emailFind all comments by Frank
Christopher000 wrote:
I have a completely different take on this, but I guess I'll pass on posting my own thoughts. I guess I really can't argue that, for the deputy, it came down to a matter of conscience, I suppose.
I like your conscience thought and the below could easily apply.

James 4:17 Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.

If this fellow felt it would cause him to lust or even that it would give a bad impression, then he should have done what he did.

My guess is if he sues over this, he will lose.


News Item8/12/19 10:59 AM
Just a Guy | Mississippi  Find all comments by Just a Guy

What's your take?...


News Item8/12/19 6:44 AM
Christopher000 | Rhode Island  Find all comments by Christopher000
I have a completely different take on this, but I guess I'll pass on posting my own thoughts. I guess I really can't argue that, for the deputy, it came down to a matter of conscience, I suppose.

News Item8/11/19 7:43 PM
Believe | Canada  Find all comments by Believe
This husband is a very noble man. His wife is a very blessed women Wow, hope he's disciplining other men because that's what men should stand up to and for.

News Item8/11/19 5:13 PM
Jim Lincoln | Nebraska  Find all comments by Jim Lincoln
Should not ❗ be on active duty. But unfortunately it is standard operating procedure to have police women in patrol cars.

News Item8/11/19 5:11 PM
Jim Lincoln | Nebraska  Find all comments by Jim Lincoln
Nothing very Noble about it, unfortunately, women have been put on active patrol duty for years. This fellow should have expected this and went into another line of work

I will point out that I do not think women should be on active patrol duty as police officers. It's not often that get killed or injured I suppose but once is once too often.

Ric Hanson wrote:
A southwest Iowa woman who was shot and killed more than three years ago while on duty as an Omaha police officer is being remembered in an unusual way. The Omaha Police Department is adding a new horse to its mounted patrol unit named Orozco to honor Officer Kerrie Orozco....daughter, Olivia, was born premature a few months before the shooting — and she was due to come home from the hospital the day after her mother was killed. Hector Orozco said he could no longer care for the horse as taking care of Olivia is his top priority. Sergeant Joe Svacina says the nine-year-old horse has undergone a year of extensive training and entered service last week.
--"Slain Iowa policewoman is honored with police horse"


News Item8/11/19 2:23 PM
Herbal Mama  Find all comments by Herbal Mama
Just a guy,

An extremely respectable


News Item8/11/19 2:06 PM
Just a Guy | Mississippi  Find all comments by Just a Guy
What a noble cause to loose a job over...

As our society tries to destroy the biblical requirements for having loyal, and faithful marriages, it's nice to see believers openly fighting to uphold it...

There are a total of 21 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments
Jump to Page : [1] 2 | last
Last PostTotal
Council apologises for primary school inviting sexually...
hugh from scotland: "the power, influence and use of the media cannot be over..."
-2 hrs 
First Woman Set to Pass Special Forces Training and Join Green...
dr. tim from way down yonder: "when i was a kid every boy wanted to be john wayne...."
-8 hrs 
Pope to Catholics: For Lent, give up trolling
mike from new york: " humble one good question, 'dr tim' but i don't see how it..."
-9 hrs 25 

Steve Lyon
Plans for Tomorrow?

Regarding Tomorrow
Sunday Service
Bible Baptist Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS

Bob Snyder
When Am I Judging You?

The Limits of Judging
Spring Branch Academy
Play! | MP3

Mark S. Wisniewski
¿Está Jehová Rugiendo?

Amós - Spanish
Iglesia Nueva Obra en...
Play! | MP3

Ken Wimer
The Glory of the Cross

Fellowship in Christ
Shreveport Grace Church
Video!Play! | MP4

Reformed, Evangelical Books

New, Used and Rare Theol­og­ical books and Bibles

Sermon: #153 The Tribulation Saints
Dr. James M. Phillips

SPONSOR | 2,300+


Satan trembles when he sees the weakest saint upon their knees. ... William Cowper

Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

iPhone + iPad
Church App
Church App
Fire Tablet
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader

Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
SA Newsroom
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Podcast
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Live Webcasting
Solo Sites
Internationalization New!
Listen Line
Events Support
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards | Biz Cards
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
Embed Codes
Logos | e-Sword | BLB

Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Auto-Upload Sermons
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Advertising | Local Ads
Privacy Policy | Support Us | Stories