Railing against â€śextremist Republican lawmakers,â€ť Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Friday unveiled her latest presidential-campaign pledge: enshrining Roe v. Wade in federal law.
Between the enactment of abortion restrictions in several states and a Supreme Court that is potentially amenable to overturning Roe, Democrats are worried that the abortion-on-demand regime could be in peril.
â€śRoe v. Wade established a womanâ€™s constitutional right to safe and legal abortion and has been the law of the land for over 46 years,â€ť Warren wrote in a Medium.com post. â€śCongress,â€ť she declared, â€śshould act to ensure that the will of the people remains the law of the land.â€ť...
â€śRoe v. Wade established a womanâ€™s constitutional right to safe and legal abortion and has been the law of the land for over 46 years,â€ť Warren wrote in a Medium.com post. â€śCongress,â€ť she declared, â€śshould act to ensure that the will of the people remains the law of the land.â€ť
How do such ignorant people get to run for president? There is no constitutional right to an abortion. If there were it would be written in it. The Supreme court invented the right out of its imagination. Just as more recently, it invented a constitutional right to homosexual marriage. It does not exist. The "will of the people" to which Fauxahontas refers has been thwarted in both decisions, and that by unconstitutional decision making.
Amendment 10: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."
Clear enough? Put that in your peace pipe, Warren.
sc wrote: Yes, Unprofirable. Abortion is always murder. I often hear people say that it should be allowed for in the cases of rape but I would disagree. Two violations are not better than one. Murdering the baby does not negate the act of rape.
Well said! Yes, in the case of rape or incest, the child in the womb didn't do anything at all. And the below covers the life and health of the mother completely!
"When the life of the mother is truly threatened by her pregnancy, if both lives cannot simultaneously be saved, then saving the motherâ€™s life must be the primary aim. If through our careful treatment of the motherâ€™s illness the pre-born patient inadvertently dies or is injured, this is tragic and, if unintentional, is not unethical and is consistent with the pro-life ethic. But the intentional killing of an unborn baby by abortion is never necessary."
Yes, Unprofirable. Abortion is always murder. I often hear people say that it should be allowed for in the cases of rape but I would disagree. Two violations are not better than one. Murdering the baby does not negate the act of rape.
Dr. Tim wrote: Bear in mind that voting for Democrats is voting for the death of babies, death of morality, and death of America.
Tim, is there any truth in the rumour that the Democratic Party in the USA was created by the British government to bring about, as you say, the 'death of America', so that the Brits can come in and take over again, and retake the Empire, making it the United States of Great Britain?
"I think we should allow for strong primary challenges, so that people can really put their Democratic chops on the line, if you will, and let the Democratic voters decide who they want," Jayapal told a press conference. "You can't say you're a Democrat if you're against immigrants, if you're against abortion, if you're against gay marriage and LGBTQ rights. I'm not sure what it means to be a Democrat if all of those things are true."
Pramila Jayapal head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus
This is the political party that Jim from Lincoln and Pulitzer Prize winner George Will wants you to vote into office