Franklin Graham: Muslims Have Infiltrated Washington, D.C.
When Bill O'Reilly brought Billy Graham's son onto his show, Franklin Graham was unafraid to speak candidly about why the West cannot unite to fight the Islamic State.
"One of the problems we have in the West is our governments, especially in Washington, have been infiltrated by Muslims who are advising the White House," Graham tells O'Reilly.
"I'm not saying they're sitting next to the president whispering in his ear, but they are in the halls, and they are speaking to the staffers."
While Graham could not immediately provide names, he said he's been told by multiple sources Muslims walk the halls of power....
Both Billy and Franklin Graham and the local Arminians here on site agree with the Arminian philosophy which is based upon shifting God to a lesser position in salvation Whilst concocting a more prominent and active role for man.
Arminian Man gets a more powerful "Free Will" so that he can dispute with God on his eternal future.
So IN Arminian philosophy:- # Sin becomes weaker and less influential within Arminian man. So the sinner isn't all that bad after all, and can thus get into heaven with more of his personal nature in tact. # Election relies more upon the decision of Arminian man so that God cannot save without man's approval. Arminian free will then plays a part in election and the sinner can then retain control over his choices. # Salvation being then of partial human origin can be refused by the sinner or lost by the free will of the misbehaving Arminian. # Atonement is redefined by the Arminian as less effective because it does not save everybody. The blood of the crucified Christ therefore does not hold the same influence with God the Father. # The Arminian image of God is that HIS sovereignty is not as comprehensive as some believe. This being so mans image is given a corresponding makeover and sin is sanitized to influence the Lord.
Jim Lincoln wrote: John Y., why don't you read the article that was written by a pastor that is close enough to IHCC, that he speaks from our pulpit from time to time? www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/luther/martin.htm]]]http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/luther/martin.htm (Martin Luther's Sacramental Gospel).
I read that article but it is totally false that Luther believed in a sacramental gospel instead of believing in Justification By Faith in Jesus alone because Luther stated in his writings he came to accept Justification By Faith in Jesus alone. Just because Luther retained Infant Baptism, making the Sign of the Holy Cross(Luther's words), Crucifix and the Mass in the Lutheran Church minus the unscriptural parts does not mean that Luther did not accept Justification By Faith in Jesus alone. And if there are scriptural Catholic doctrines as well as unscriptural Catholic doctrines then the RCC is not pagan totally.
John Yurich USA wrote: Nobody in their right mind believes the RCC is a pagan temple
The seeds were planted a long time ago John.
"Constantine envisioned Christianity as a religion that could unite the Roman Empire, which at that time was beginning to fragment and divide. While this may have seemed to be a positive development for the Christian church, the results were anything but positive. Just as Constantine refused to fully embrace the Christian faith, but continued many of his pagan beliefs and practices, so the Christian church that Constantine promoted was a mixture of true Christianity and Roman paganism.
Constantine found that, with the Roman Empire being so vast, expansive, and diverse, not everyone would agree to forsake his or her religious beliefs to embrace Christianity. So, Constantine allowed, and even promoted, the “Christianization” of pagan beliefs. Completely pagan and utterly unbiblical beliefs were given new “Christian” identities." EG: When the Catholic Church absorbed Roman paganism, it simply replaced the pantheon of gods with the saints."
John Y., why don't you read the article that was written by a pastor that is close enough to IHCC, that he speaks from our pulpit from time to time? [URL=http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/luther/martin.htm]]]http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/luther/martin.htm (Martin Luther's Sacramental Gospel)[/URL]. You must be using the SA Android/iPhone app. This should make it easy for you. Is that why you haven't seen, [URL=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VClgYQnT7Z8]]]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VClgYQnT7Z8 (Catholicism Crisis of Faith (54 Minute YouTube video))[/URL] done by James McCarthy? Android devices usually play YouTube videos quite easily since The Android OS was made by the company that now owns YouTube.
Every-once-in-awhile, I really have to point out Frankie's failings on this particular thread, since he can't preach or attract crowds like his father, he has shifted towards a political "gospel" He is pushing [URL=http://www.pre-trib.org/data/pdf/Ice-WhatisDominionTheolo.pdf]]]What is Dominion Theology? (PDF)[/URL] in effect. He seems to have forgotten what the Gospel is
Frank wrote: I have also experienced some of my posts not showing up, but I don't remember the subject matter and it doesn't happen very often, so I just ignore it. I remember when moderator beta was on a tear and was deleting so many things it was obvious to me that he had a personal agenda. One thing is for sure, if satan's church cannot be exposed on this forum, then I will truly leave it once and forever.
Dorcas wrote: Thanks brother. Something for you to ponder...I have had some posts concerning Romanism not show up on the board...there were no personal attacks, or names mentioned, just some of my own personal experiences and quotes from their own sources. Strange huh? Maybe someone's toes are being stepped on....
I have also experienced some of my posts not showing up, but I don't remember the subject matter and it doesn't happen very often, so I just ignore it. I remember when moderator beta was on a tear and was deleting so many things it was obvious to me that he had a personal agenda. One thing is for sure, if satan's church cannot be exposed on this forum, then I will truly leave it once and forever.
Frank wrote: Amen sister, amen. You would think that if only a couple agree with him that would alert him as to the errors of his thinking, but it doesn't. Now you and I already know what that means, so I will just leave it there; for now at least.
Thanks brother. Something for you to ponder...I have had some posts concerning Romanism not show up on the board...there were no personal attacks, or names mentioned, just some of my own personal experiences and quotes from their own sources. Strange huh? Maybe someone's toes are being stepped on....
Dorcas wrote: Well John Y....you would be hard pressed to find any on this site who would agree with you concerning your beloved RC organization, except of course SteveR. And yes it is a pagan anti-Christ religion..
Amen sister, amen. You would think that if only a couple agree with him that would alert him as to the errors of his thinking, but it doesn't.
Now you and I already know what that means, so I will just leave it there; for now at least.
Well John Y....you would be hard pressed to find any on this site who would agree with you concerning your beloved RC organization, except of course SteveR.
Jim Lincoln wrote: I have pointed out, that Lutheranism was a giant step forward from Romanism. However, such things as Martin Luther's Sacramental Gospel means at Indian Hills Community Church does not endorse Lutheranism. we have had people come out of the Lutheran Church including a man who became a pastor. So, we have not been holding any ecumenical now nor in the past. Besides you're ignoring the pagan temple that you are attending John Y., there are many reasons for Roman Catholics, Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses to leave their apostate organizations which can be different from those are Lutherans. So again, John Y., you have no excuse for not leaving the Romish church. Dorcas, I know what you mean because I came out of the United Methodist Church, Thank God!
Luther believed in Justification By Faith in Jesus alone, that is what he stated in his writings that he came to accept. So it is total nonsense that Luther had a sacramental gospel. Nobody in their right mind believes the RCC is a pagan temple as pagans don't worship Jesus as God and the RCC has always worshiped the biblical and historical Jesus as God.
Oh really, Those things you mentioned are unscriptural but they are not pagan.
There are no pagan rites in popery??? Praying to and for the dead. Repeatitive words over and over while holding beads. A bloodless sacrifice performed by a wizard. Swinging a censor of funny smelling smoke. Veneration and bowing to a piece of bread. Idols....and on and on and on!
I have pointed out, that Lutheranism was a giant step forward from Romanism. However, such things as [URL=http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/luther/martin.htm]]]Martin Luther's Sacramental Gospel[/URL] means at Indian Hills Community Church does not endorse Lutheranism. we have had people come out of the Lutheran Church including a man who became a pastor. So, we have not been holding any ecumenical now nor in the past.
Besides you're ignoring the pagan temple that you are attending John Y., there are many reasons for [URL=https://www.jashow.org/wiki/index.php/Roman_Catholics,_Mormons_and_Jehovah%E2%80%99s_Witnesses]]]Roman Catholics, Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses[/URL] to leave their apostate organizations which can be different from those are Lutherans. So again, John Y., you have no excuse for not leaving the Romish church.
Dorcas, I know what you mean because I came out of the United Methodist Church, Thank God!
Many Romam Catholic get saved, but the caveat is that their eyes are opened from without, not within. God knows His elect and theu hear Him as He calls them to come out from her. Now, for me, "her" can mean any other religion that is not of Him as well, cults, occult, or whatever. To me, the "her" is basically any so called religion, etc which is outside of God's Word, commands, specific doctrines, etc, etc.
Jim Lincoln wrote: He not only goes to a pagan temple, do you think that Christians should do that? But, much more importantly he participates in its pagan rites and as far as I can tell financially supports this pagan temple as well. A Christian (or even a sensible person for that matter) Come out of the Catholic Church.
I suppose you also believe the Lutheran Church is a pagan temple? Luther under the guidance of the Holy Spirit retained the Mass in the Lutheran Church minus the unscriptural parts. I don't participate in any pagan rites in the Catholic Church as there are no pagan rites in the Catholic Church. There are some unscriptural Catholic doctrines and some unscriptural parts to the Mass. I only participate in the scriptural parts to the Mass.
Dorcas, I have never stated that the RCC is entirely Christian. I have always stated that there are both Christian(Scriptural) Catholic doctrines and parts to the Mass and unscriptural Catholic doctrines and parts to the Mass.
Frank, If Jesus will not look at the church that one attended in deciding who enters Heaven then why would the Holy Spirit lead one out of the RCC? Just because one who trusts in Jesus alone for salvation does not leave the RCC does not mean they are unsa
Steve asked "...If the devil preached the Gospel could someone be saved?" Well,they say that many are saved at BG crusades. It is the power of the word not the messenger. And Frank,doesn't need help from anyone. He's pretty tight with the Holy Spirit. We could all learn a lot from his meekness and fortitude. And women are not considered inferior in the Bible as far as discernment,especially,Dorcas. If I were you I'd refrain from taking her to task. You might be embarrassed. ...just wondering when you may have been saved. Your fruit often comes off as sour grapes.
Frank wrote: I really hope you are feeling better or will start feeling better. Anyway, I didn't say newly saved in a RCC. I was saved outside that church and my guess is 100% would say the same thing. That is unless someone was passing out tracts in the church and someone read them while sitting in the pews in between all their rituals. Dorcas, I gotta take off for a while, I will leave SteveR in your hands.
Aside from Franks desire to run away and leave his error in the hands of inferior women, his comments reminded me of some ancient questions in Christendom
1) If the devil preached the Gospel could someone be saved? 2) Could the devil hear the Gospel and be converted?
While our answers should be unanimous, these questions were debated in the early centuries of Christianity
SteveR wrote: hmmmm 'Newly saved' in satans church? Your tailing is smoking beelzebub, or have you been dipping into the sacramental hot sauce this afternoon?
I really hope you are feeling better or will start feeling better.
Anyway, I didn't say newly saved in a RCC. I was saved outside that church and my guess is 100% would say the same thing. That is unless someone was passing out tracts in the church and someone read them while sitting in the pews in between all their rituals.
Dorcas, I gotta take off for a while, I will leave SteveR in your hands.
Frank wrote: Sister, I agree with your thoughts. Many of us came out of that abominable manmade religion. If someone chooses to remain in the RCC, they are either newly saved and will leave sooner than later or they were never saved in the first place. I also understood your thoughts regarding a building versus those that worship in that building. A building cannot be spiritual or unspiritual and that is all you meant. Hang in there sister and just think, one day this will all be over with and we will be in eternity with our Lord and Savior.
Thank-you Frank, I appreciate your comments and encouragement, you are a real benefit to this forum.
Frank wrote: But remember, I said they would leave "sooner than later". I can't put a limitation on what sooner means, but it is the opposite of later. And then I followed by saying if they don't leave, then they were never saved in the first place. Like Dorcas said, the Holy Spirit will not allow us to worship alongside/with satan's church.
hmmmm 'Newly saved' in satans church?
Your tailing is smoking beelzebub, or have you been dipping into the sacramental hot sauce this afternoon?