I 'admire' your brave attacks on the KJV, but answer why you don't move to the ESV? Also why a jesuit was connected with the UBS nestle aland text below. I never hear you making any valid critiques of these modern versions. Do you agree with Packer on Mother Teresa (earlier post), thought not. Why would I trust him as general editor of the ESV? Nice to hear a reasoned response for a change

"In 1964 Cardinal Martini, at that time Professor of New Testament
Textual Studies at the Pontifical Biblical Institute in Rome, became a
member of the editorial committee for the UBS Greek New Testament.
Even when he was in charge of the archdiocese of Milan…he found the
time to attend the long session of the committee in August 1981…at
which the final form of the fourth revised edition of the Greek New
Testament was established..."
[URL=http://www.trinitarianbiblesociety.org/site/qr/QR562.pdf]]]Here[/URL]

The NASB is not as good as the ESV is it, see John Piper on why the ESV should be the stndard version for the church and why he abandoned the NASB.

Not if some evangelicals are seeking a ONE BIBLE VERSION AUTHORITY should NASB users be moving from that version? Or are they NASB only

The ESV represents a new level of excellence in Bible translations—"
Dr. R. Albert Mohler,

Then again J I Packer is General Editor of the ESV and he has just revised one of his books

[URL=http://www.takeheed.net/Take_Heed_2010/Current_Concerns/Jan_2010/Packer_and_Mother_Teresa.htm]]]Trusting Revisionists[/URL]

So should I follow Packer then Sproul and Piper and Mohler as my authority on which tie to chose, as it seems to be all about personal preference? Rather than accuracy.

Strange that the NIV went out of fashion as a bad translation, even stranger it was ever in fashion